Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.2.86

Effect of mixing method and storage time on dimensional stability of alginate impressions materials  

Bang, Hyun-Ji (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Shim, Hyun-Ah (The Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University)
Cho, Young-Eun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.58, no.2, 2020 , pp. 86-94 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the volume stability depending on the mixing methods and storage time for the conventional alginate and extended-pour alginate. Materials and methods: An arch-shaped metal model was fabricated, and one conventional alginate and two extended-pour alginates were used to take impressions using different mixing methods (hand and automatic). 120 impressions were taken (40 per each alginate) and stone models were made in accordance with the different storage times (immediate, 2 days, 5 days, and 6 days). The models were scanned with a 3D table scanner and dimensional change was measured by superimposing the scan data. Using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), the general linear model and Tukey's post hoc test was conducted for statistical analysis (P<.001). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the dimensional accuracy between two mixing methods, and the volume change was minimum when the stone was poured immediately in all groups. Dimensional accuracy showed a statistically significant difference between groups after 2 days of storage, and extended-pour alginate showed higher accuracy after 5 days of storage comparing to conventional one. Large amounts of volume change were showed at 2 - 5 days for conventional alginate and at 5 - 6 days for extended pour alginate. Conclusion: The mixing method of alginate does not affect volume stability. Although extended-pour alginate has better volume stability than conventional alginate for a long time, it is recommended to pour stone as soon as possible.
Keywords
Alginate; Dimensional stability; Extended-pour alginate; Mixing method; Storage time;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kursad A, Zaimoglu A, Dogan E, Ozkir S. The influence of different mixing methods on the dimensional stability and surface detail reproduction of two different brands of irreversible hydrocolloids. Eur J Gen Dent 2014;3:17-21.   DOI
2 Kaiser DA, Nicholls JI. A study of distortion and surface hardness of improved artificial stone casts. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:373-81.   DOI
3 Kulkarni MM, Thombare RU. Dimensional changes of alginate dental impression materials-An invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:ZC98-ZC102.
4 Cho SH, Schaefer O, Thompson GA, Guentsch A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:310-5.   DOI
5 Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
6 Inoue K, Song YX, Kamiunten O, Oku J, Terao T, Fujii K. Effect of mixing method on rheological properties of alginate impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:615-9.   DOI
7 Dreesen K, Kellens A, Wevers M, Thilakarathne PJ, Willems G. The influence of mixing methods and disinfectant on the physical properties of alginate impression materials. Eur J Orthod 2013;35:381-7.   DOI
8 Frey G, Lu H, Powers J. Effect of mixing methods on mechanical properties of alginate impression materials. J Prosthodont 2005;14:221-5.   DOI
9 Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36:36-41; discussion 14.   DOI
10 Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD, Powers J, Bussa HI, Marie Salas-Lopez A, Corbett JA. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 2010;80:474-81.   DOI
11 White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Analysis of intraarch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:456.e1-9; discussion 456-7.   DOI
12 Nassar U, Hussein B, Oko A, Carey JP, Flores-Mir C. Dimensional accuracy of 2 irreversible hydrocolloid alternative impression materials with immediate and delayed pouring. J Can Dent Assoc 2012;78:c2.
13 Walker MP, Burckhard J, Mitts DA, Williams KB. Dimensional change over time of extended-storage alginate impression materials. Angle Orthod 2010;80:1110-5.   DOI
14 Gumus HO, Dincel M, Buyuk SK, Kilinc HI, Bilgin MS, Zortuk M. The effect of pouring time on the dimensional stability of casts made from conventional and extended-pour irreversible hydrocolloids by 3D modelling. J Dent Sci 2015;10:275-81.   DOI
15 Coleman RM, Hembree JH, Weber FN. Dimensional stability of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. Am J Orthod 1979;75:438-46.   DOI
16 Revised American Dental Association Specification no.19 for Non-Aqueous, Elastomeric dental impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:733-41.   DOI
17 Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8.   DOI
18 Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014;42:677-83.   DOI
19 Cook W. Alginate dental impression materials: chemistry, structure, and properties. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:1-24.   DOI
20 Giordano R 2nd. Impression materials: basic properties. Gen Dent 2000;48:510-2, 514, 516.
21 Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803.   DOI
22 Alcan T, Ceylanoglu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6.   DOI
23 Imbery TA, Nehring J, Janus C, Moon PC. Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:32-9.   DOI
24 Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5.   DOI
25 Nallamuthu N, Braden M, Patel MP. Dimensional changes of alginate dental impression materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2006;17:1205-10.   DOI
26 Fellows CM, Thomas GA. Determination of bound and unbound water in dental alginate irreversible hydrocolloid by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Dent Mater 2009;25:486-93.   DOI
27 Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Dimensional accuracy of three different alginate impression materials. J Prosthodont 1995;4:195-9.   DOI
28 Chen SY, Liang WM, Chen FN. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials. J Dent 2004;32:603-9.   DOI
29 Sedda M, Casarotto A, Raustia A, Borracchini A. Effect of storage time on the accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloids. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:59-66.   DOI
30 Davies C. Orthodontic products update. Cross infection control and elastomeric module delivery systems. Br J Orthod 1998;25:301-3.   DOI
31 Sawyer HF, Sandrik JL, Neiman R. Accuracy of casts produced from alginate and hydrocolloid impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:806-8.   DOI
32 Todd JA, Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Dimensional changes of extended-pour alginate impression materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:S55-63.   DOI
33 Wadhwa SS, Mehta R, Duggal N, Vasudeva K. The effect of pouring time on the dimensional accuracy of casts made from different irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:313-8.   DOI
34 Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lockowandt P. Accuracy of irreversible hydrocolloids (alginates) for fixed prosthodontics. A comparison between irreversible hydrocolloid, reversible hydrocolloid, and addition silicone for use in the syringe-tray technique. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:651-60.   DOI