Clinical accuracy of impression technique using digital superimposition of customized abutment with subgingival margin: A case report |
Kim, Jin-Wan
(Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) Lee, So-Hyoun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) Lee, Hyeonjong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) |
1 | Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: A review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21. DOI |
2 | Joda T, Bragger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:e185-9. DOI |
3 | Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-5. DOI |
4 | Seo KS, Kim SJ, Kwon JH, Chang JS. Implant digital impression with intraoral scanners: A literature review. The Korean Acad of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology 2017;21:2-13. DOI |
5 | Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4. DOI |
6 | Tsirogiannis P, Reissmann DR, Heydecke G. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:328-35.e2. DOI |
7 | Lin WS, Harris BT, Morton D. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:187-91. DOI |
8 | Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:715-9. DOI |
9 | Kutkut A, Abu-Hammad O, Mitchell R. Esthetic considerations for reconstructing implant emergence profile using titanium and zirconia custom implant abutments: Fifty case series report. J Oral Implantol 2015;41:554-61. DOI |
10 | Bennani V, Schwass D, Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: current status. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1354-63. DOI |
11 | Azer SS. A simplified technique for creating a customized gingival emergence profile for implant-supported crowns. J Prosthodont 2010;19:497-501. DOI |
12 | Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Probing depth at implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:623-7. DOI |
13 | Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:343-52. DOI |
14 | Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. DOI |
15 | Lee JW, Park JM. Evaluation of marginal and internal gap under model-free monolithic zirconia restoration fabricated by digital intraoral scanner. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2016;54:210-7. DOI |
16 | Miller RJ, Kuo E, Choi W. Validation of align technology's treat III digital model superimposition tool and its case application. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:143-9. DOI |
17 | Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1495-504. DOI |
18 | Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:834-9. DOI |
19 | Guth JF, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1445-55. DOI |
20 | Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant Impressions with Commercial Scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach. J Prosthodont 2017;26:34-41. DOI |