Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.4.364

Utilization of digital technology in fabricating mandibular implant overdenture for skeletal class II edentulous patient: A case report  

Lee, Yeun-Yi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Hong, Seoungjin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Paek, Janghyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Noh, Kwantae (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Kwon, Kung-Rock (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.57, no.4, 2019 , pp. 364-373 More about this Journal
Abstract
Unlike class I patients, skeletal class II patients have unstable occlusion thus leading to instability of mandibular complete denture. Therefore, mandibular implant overdenture has been the standard of care due to its advantages in stability and retention. The types of attachments can be divided into two categories: solitary and bar type. The indications vary between two categories. In this clinical report, digital technology was utilized from the implant planning to the choice of appropriate attachment. Implants were placed at the desired location as previously planned in terms of angle and depth. Maxillary removable partial denture and mandibular implant overdenture are expected to have fair prognosis.
Keywords
Class II jaw relation; Implant overdenture; CM LOC; GOM Inspect software; Spatial analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cakarer S, Can T, Yaltirik M, Keskin C. Complications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implantsupported overdentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e953-9.
2 Toolson LB, Smith DE. Clinical measurement and evaluation of vertical dimension. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:236-41.   DOI
3 Klemetti E. Is there a certain number of implants needed to retain an overdenture? J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:80-4.   DOI
4 Hong HR, Pae A, Kim Y, Paek J, Kim HS, Kwon KR. Effect of implant position, angulation, and attachment height on peri-implant bone stress associated with mandibular twoimplant overdentures: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:e69-76.
5 Oda K, Kanazawa M, Takeshita S, Minakuchi S. Influence of implant number on the movement of mandibular implant overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:380-5.   DOI
6 Jensen WO. Occlusion for the Class II jaw relations patient. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:432-4.   DOI
7 Schuyler CH. An evaluation of incisal guidance and its influence in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1959;9:374-8.   DOI
8 Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, Jeffcoat MK. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1455-8.   DOI
9 Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:468-73.   DOI
10 Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Treatment concept for mandibular overdentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:539-45.
11 Preiskel HW. Precision attachments in prosthodontics: the application of intracoronal and extracoronal attachments. Quintessence Pub Co., 1984. p. 102-38.
12 Preiskel HW. Overdentures made easy: A guide to implantand root-supported prostheses. Quintessence Pub Co., 1996. p. 81-104.