Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2019.57.3.203

Effect of abutment superimposition process of dental model scanner on final virtual model  

Yu, Beom-Young (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Son, Keunbada (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Kyu-Bok (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute (A3DI), Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.57, no.3, 2019 , pp. 203-210 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of the abutment superimposition process on the final virtual model in the scanning process of single and 3-units bridge model using a dental model scanner. Materials and methods: A gypsum model for single and 3-unit bridges was manufactured for evaluating. And working casts with removable dies were made using Pindex system. A dental model scanner (3Shape E1 scanner) was used to obtain CAD reference model (CRM) and CAD test model (CTM). The CRM was scanned without removing after dividing the abutments in the working cast. Then, CTM was scanned with separated from the divided abutments and superimposed on the CRM (n=20). Finally, three-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic control X) was used to analyze the root mean square (RMS) and Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis (${\alpha}=.05$). Results: The RMS mean abutment for single full crown preparation was $10.93{\mu}m$ and the RMS average abutment for 3 unit bridge preparation was $6.9{\mu}m$. The RMS mean of the two groups showed statistically significant differences (P<.001). In addition, errors of positive and negative of two groups averaged $9.83{\mu}m$, $-6.79{\mu}m$ and 3-units bridge abutment $6.22{\mu}m$, $-3.3{\mu}m$, respectively. The mean values of the errors of positive and negative of two groups were all statistically significantly lower in 3-unit bridge abutments (P<.001). Conclusion: Although the number of abutments increased during the scan process of the working cast with removable dies, the error due to the superimposition of abutments did not increase. There was also a significantly higher error in single abutments, but within the range of clinically acceptable scan accuracy.
Keywords
Model scanner; Superimposition; Single prosthesis; 3-units bridge; 3-dimentional analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lim JH. The accuracy according to the various dowel pins of working cast with removable dies. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1997;35:373-84.
2 Miranda FJ, Dilts WE, Duncanson MG, Collard EW. Comparative stability of two removable die systems. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:326-33.   DOI
3 Jeon JH, Sung HK, Min BK, Hwang JS, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of reproducibility of prepared tooth impression scanning utilized with white and blue light scanners. J Korean Acad Dent Technol 2015;37:213-8.   DOI
4 Lee HH, Lee DH, Lee KB. In vitro evaluation methods on adaptation of fixed dental prosthesis. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2017;33:63-70.   DOI
5 Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:313-20.   DOI
6 Bernal C, de Agustina B, Marin M, Camacho A. Performance evaluation of optical scanner based on blue LED structured light. Proc Eng 2013;63:591-8.   DOI
7 Ganzer N, Feldmann I, Liv P, Bondemark L. A novel method for superimposition and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on validity and reliability. Eur J Orthod 2018;40:45-51.   DOI
8 Lee JJ, Park JY, Bae SY, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Evaluation of the model accuracy according to three types of dental scanner. J Dent Hyg Sci 2015;15:226-31.   DOI
9 Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent 1991;1:150-4.
10 Son KBD, Lee WS, Lee KB. Effect of repeated learning for two dental CAD software programs. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2017;33:88-96.   DOI
11 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
12 Luthardt RG, Kuhmstedt P, Walter MH. A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. Dent Mater 2003;19:19-24.   DOI
13 Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992;14:239-56.   DOI
14 Sin YD, Park JH, Park GW, Baek SH, Baek MH. 3D range image registration using ICP algorithm. Korea Autom Control Conf 2009;9:177-81.
15 He Y, Liang B, Yang J, Li S, He J. An iterative closest points algorithm for registration of 3D laser scanner point clouds with geometric features. Sensors (Basel) 2017;17(8). pii:E1862.
16 Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25:929-36.   DOI
17 Kim KB, Kim SJ, Kim JH, Kim JH. An evaluation of validity of three dimensional digital model fabricated by dental scannable stone. J Korean Acad Dent Technol 2013;35:29-35.   DOI
18 Jeon JH, Jung ID, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scans of stone models and impressions using a blue LED scanner. Dent Mater J 2015;34:686-91.   DOI
19 Kim KB, Jung JK, Kim JH. Accuracy of digital impression made from different elastomeric impression materials: Threedimensional superimpositional analysis. J Dent Hyg Sci 2014;14:94-100.
20 Eom SH, Oh SC. Accuracy of stone cast produced by adjustable dental impression tray. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:453-65.
21 Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:549-53.   DOI
22 Rudolph H, Salmen H, Moldan M, Kuhn K, Sichwardt V, Wostmann B, Luthardt RG. Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 2016;24:85-94.   DOI
23 Emir F, Piskin B, Sipahi C. Effect of dental technician disparities on the 3-dimensional accuracy of definitive casts. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:410-8.   DOI
24 Choi SS, Kim JH, Kim JH. Comparative analysis on digital models obtained by white light and blue LED optical scanners. J Korean Acad Dent Technol 2014;36:17-23.   DOI
25 Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touchprobe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:194-200.   DOI