Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.4.278

Differences in percussion-type measurements of implant stability according to height of healing abutments and measurement angle  

Park, Yang-Hoon (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Dental School Hospital at Gangdong)
Leesungbok, Richard (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Dental School Hospital at Gangdong)
Lee, Suk-Won (Department of Biomaterials and Prosthodontics, Kyung Hee University Dental School Hospital at Gangdong)
Paek, Janghyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Lee, Jeong-Yol (Department of Prosthodontics, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University Medical Center, Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.56, no.4, 2018 , pp. 278-286 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of healing abutment height and measurement angle on implant stability when using Periotest and AnyCheck. Materials and methods: 60 implants were placed into artificial bone blocks. After implant insertion, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm healing abutments were installed on 15 specimens, respectively. Insertion torque value, implant stability test, Periotest value were measured. Insertion torque value was controlled between 45 - 55 Ncm. AnyCheck was used for measuring implant stability test and Periotest M was used for measuring Periotest value. Implant stability test and Periotest value were measured at the angles of 0 and 30 degrees to the horizontal plane. Measured values were analyzed statistically. Results: Insertion torque value had no significant difference among groups. When healing abutment height was higher, implant stability test and Periotest value showed lower stability. Also when measurement angle was decreased, implant stability test and Periotest value showed lower stability. Conclusion: When measuring stability of implants with percussion type devices, measured values should be evaluated considering height of healing abutments and measurement angle.
Keywords
Implant stability; AnyCheck; Periotest; Implant stability test; Periotest value; Insertion torque value;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Faulkner MG, Wolfaardt JF, Chan A. Measuring abutment/implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:681-8.
2 Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991; 62:2-4.   DOI
3 Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Branemark System implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:671-7.
4 Jun SH, Chang BM, Weber HP, Kwon JJ. Comparison of initial stability parameters and histomorphometric analysis of implants inserted into extraction sockets: human fresh cadaver study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:985-90.
5 Levin BP. The correlation between immediate implant insertion torque and implant stability quotient. Int J Periodontic Restor Dent 2016;36:833-40.   DOI
6 Gomez-Roman G, Lukas D. Influence of the implant abutment on the Periotest value: an in vivo study. Quintessence Int 2001;32:797-9.
7 Kim SJ, Han DH. Periotest assessment of dental implant mobility: a clinical study. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36: 758-71.
8 Herrmann I, Lekholm U, Holm S, Kultje C. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:220-30.
9 Oh JS, Kim SG. Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113:e35-40.
10 Swami V, Vijayaraghavan V, Swami V. Current trends to measure implant stability. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:124-30.   DOI
11 Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:437-43.   DOI
12 Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66.   DOI
13 Raghavendra S, Wood MC, Taylor TD. Early wound healing around endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:425-31.
14 Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
15 Devlin H, Horner K, Ledgerton D. A comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:323-7.   DOI
16 Aparicio C. The use of the Periotest value as the initial success criteria of an implant: 8-year report. Int J Periodontic Restor Dent 1997;17:150-61.
17 Aparicio C, Lang NP, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:2-7.   DOI
18 Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:55-61.
19 Choi HH, Chung CH, Kim SG, Son MK. Reliability of 2 implant stability measuring methods in assessment of various periimplant bone loss: an in vitro study with the Periotest and Osstell Mentor. Implant Dent 2014;23:51-6.   DOI
20 Olive J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:390-400.
21 Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent 2010;38:612-20.   DOI
22 Elias CN, Rocha FA, Nascimento AL, Coelho PG. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;16:169-80.   DOI
23 O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92.   DOI
24 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:24-30.   DOI
25 Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:743-54.
26 Faulkner MG, Giannitsios D, Lipsett AW, Wolfaardt JF. The use and abuse of the Periotest for 2-piece implant/abutment systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:486-94.
27 Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. A pilot study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:202-6.   DOI
28 Johansson CB, Sennerby L, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:437-41.