Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.3.256

Implant prosthesis using intraoral scanner: Case Report  

Kang, Byeong-Gil (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.53, no.3, 2015 , pp. 256-261 More about this Journal
Abstract
Accuracy is the most important thing in implant prosthesis, for this reason it is essential procedure to check the accuracy of impression taking. However, impression material has its own error and the error occurs in model-making procedure. As an alternative way to this, using intraoral scanner can be suggested and many studies were issued reporting that there's no statistically significant difference in accuracy between intraoral scanner and conventional impression. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to report the process of making of implant prosthesis using intraoral scanner, which is more convenient, fast, accurate compared with conventional method.
Keywords
Intraoral scan; CAD/CAM; Implant prosthesis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:226-36.
2 Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323-31.   DOI
3 Del'Acqua MA, Cha′vez AM, Compagnoni MA, Molo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:715-21.
4 Cho SH, Schaefer O, Thompson GA, Guentsch A. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:310-5.   DOI
5 Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8.   DOI
6 Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015 Feb 13.
7 Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:69-76.   DOI