Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.3.244

A case report of a surgical guide fabricated via intraoral scanning-based implant planning and wax-based rapid prototyping  

Shin, Jong-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.53, no.3, 2015 , pp. 244-249 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the recent progress of digital technology, the computer guided surgery utilizing a guide template in the placement of implant has been actively performed, and the method employing the intraoral scanner at the implant prosthesis introduced. Fabrication method of the guide template can be largely classified into design-related rapid prototyping (RP) system and vector milling system, and each of the method has its own weakness in the clinical application despite of excellent accuracy. Thus, in this case study, a working model was fabricated by the wax RP technology using images acquired by CBCT and an intraoral scanner, and the metal bushing was picked up with orthodontic resin cast upon the wax model. Using this method, a surgical guide template was fabricated and used in surgery. From this, we could obtain a satisfactory outcome clinically in the implant placement and the fabrication of the final prostheses and thus report this case herein.
Keywords
Surgical guide; Intraoral scanning-based implant planning; Wax-based rapid prototyping;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:651-6.   DOI
2 Scherer U, Stoetzer M, Ruecker M, Gellrich NC, von See C. Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants. Clin Oral Investig 2014 Oct 30.
3 Park JM, Yi TK, Jung JK, Kim Y, Park EJ, Han CH, Koak JY, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Accuracy of 5-axis precision milling for guided surgical template. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48: 294-300.   DOI
4 Park JM, Yi TK, Koak JY, Kim SK, Park EJ, Heo SJ. Comparison of five-axis milling and rapid prototyping for implant surgical templates. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:374-83.   DOI
5 Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormée J, Coudert JL. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:300-3.   DOI
6 Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS, Yeo IS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:161-3.   DOI
7 Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int 2015;46:9-17.
8 Talwar N, Chand P, Singh BP, Rao J, Pal US, Ram H. Evaluation of the efficacy of a prosthodontic stent in determining the position of dental implants. J Prosthodont 2012;21:42-7.   DOI
9 Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
10 Youk SY, Lee JH, Park JM, Heo SJ, Roh HK, Park EJ, Shin IH. A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:395-405.   DOI
11 Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1113-8.   DOI
12 Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Laser Eng 2014;54:203-21.   DOI
13 Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-5.   DOI