Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.2.111

Accuracy assessment of implant placement using a stereolithographic surgical guide made with digital scan  

Jeong, Seung-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Fang, Jeong-Whan (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Hwang, Chan-Hyeon (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Kang, Se-Ha (Department of Prosthodontics, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Choi, Byung-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Fang, Yiqin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Jeon, Hyongtae (Dio research institute)
An, Sunghun (Dio research institute)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.53, no.2, 2015 , pp. 111-119 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a stereolithographic surgical guide that was made with information from intraoral digital impressions and cone beam CT (CBCT). Materials and methods: Six sets of resin maxilla and mandible models with missing teeth were used in this study. Intraoral digital impressions were made. The virtual models provided by these intraoral digital impressions and by the CBCT scan images of the resin models were used to create a surgical guide. Implant surgery was performed on the resin models using the surgical guide. After implant placement, the models were subjected to another CBCT scan to compare the planned and actual implant positions. Deviations in position, depth and axis between the planned and actual positions were measured for each implant. Results: The mean deviation of the insertion point and angulation were 0.28 mm and $0.26^{\circ}$, apex point were 0.11 mm and 0.14 mm respectively. The implants were situated at a mean of 0.44 mm coronal to the planned vertical position. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that stereolithographic surgical guides created without the use of impressions and stone models show promising accuracy in implant placement.
Keywords
CAD/CAM; Digital data; Digital impression; Digital implant; Guided surgery;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jeong SM, Choi BH, Xuan F, Kim HR. Flapless implant surgery using a mini-incision. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:74-9.   DOI
2 Sclar AG. Guidelines for flapless surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:20-32.
3 Terzioglu H, Akkaya M, Ozan O. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:137-42.
4 Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araujo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. J Periodontol 2005;76: 503-7.   DOI
5 Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spuntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:709-16.
6 Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816-21.   DOI
7 van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant loading in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:663-70.
8 Kalt G, Gehrke P. Transfer precision of three-dimensional implant planning with CT assisted offline navigation. Int J Comput Dent 2008;11:213-25.
9 Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35:207-11.   DOI
10 Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part II. J Orthod 2004;31:154-62.   DOI
11 Flugge TV, Nelson K, Schmelzeisen R, Metzger MC. Threedimensional plotting and printing of an implant drilling guide: simplifying guided implant surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1340-6.   DOI
12 Lee CY, Ganz SD, Wong N, Suzuki JB. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1. Implant Dent 2012;21:265-71.   DOI
13 Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei E. Radiographic changes around immediately restored dental implants in periodontally susceptible patients: 1-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23: 531-8.
14 Stapleton BM, Lin WS, Ntounis A, Harris BT, Morton D. Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:402-8.   DOI
15 Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD, Powers J, Bussa HI, Marie Salas-Lopez A, Corbett JA. Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 2010;80:474-81.   DOI
16 Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD, Colville CD, Laman S. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:916-22.   DOI
17 Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH, Tahmaseb A. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:92-109.