Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.4.312

Effect of water storage on the fracture toughness of dental resin cement used for zirconia restoration  

Goo, Bon-Wook (School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Ha, Seung-Ryong (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ajou University)
Kim, Hee-Kyung (Department of Prosthodontics, Veterans Health Service Medical Center)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.52, no.4, 2014 , pp. 312-316 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the fracture toughness of currently available resin cements for zirconia restorations and evaluate the effect of water storage on fracture toughness of those resin cements. Materials and methods: Single-edge notched specimens ($3mm{\times}6mm{\times}25mm$) were prepared from three currently available dual cure resin cements for zirconia restorations (Panavia F 2.0, Clearfil SA luting and Zirconite). Each resin cement was divided into four groups: immersed in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 1 (Control group), 30, 90, or 180 days (n=5). Specimens were loaded in three point bending at a cross-head speed of 0.1 mm/s. The maximum load at specimen failure was recorded and the fracture toughness ($K_{IC}$) was calculated. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and multiple comparison $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ test (${\alpha}$=.05). Results: In control group, the mean $K_{IC}$ was $3.41{\pm}0.64MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$ for Panavia F, 2.0, $3.07{\pm}0.41MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$ for Zirconite, $2.58{\pm}0.30MN{\cdot}m^{-1.5}$ for Clearfil SA luting respectively, but statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between them. Although a gradual decrease of $K_{IC}$ in Panavia F 2.0 and gradual increases of KIC in Clearfil SA luting and Zirconite were observed with storage time, there were no significant differences between immersion time for each cement. Conclusion: The resin cements for zirconia restorations exhibit much higher $K_{IC}$ values than conventional resin cements. The fracture toughness of resin cement for zirconia restoration would not be affected by water storage.
Keywords
Dental resin cement; Zirconia restoration; Fracture toughness; Water storage;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yuksel E, Zaimoglu A. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res 2011;25:261-6.   DOI
2 Azar MR, Bagheri R, Burrow MF. Effect of storage media and time on the fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements. Aust Dent J 2012;57:349-54.   DOI
3 Miettinen VM, Narva KK, Vallittu PK. Water sorption, solubility and effect of post-curing of glass fibre reinforced polymers. Biomaterials 1999;20:1187-94.   DOI
4 Ferracane JL, Berge HX. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol. J Dent Res 1995;74:1418-23.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Silva NR, Bonfante EA, Zavanelli RA, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Coelho PG. Reliability of metalloceramic and zirconia-based ceramic crowns. J Dent Res 2010;89:1051-6.   DOI
6 Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. Current status of zirconia-based fixed restorations. J Oral Sci 2010;52:531-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Martins LM, Lorenzoni FC, Melo AO, Silva LM, Oliveira JL, Oliveira PC, Bonfante G. Internal fit of two all-ceramic systems and metal-ceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:235-40.   DOI
8 Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Berlin JS, Lee JS. Fracture toughness of resin-based luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:204-9.   DOI
9 Mueller HJ. Fracture toughness and fractography of dental cements, lining, build-up, and filling materials. Scanning Microsc 1990;4:297-307.
10 BS 5447:1997. Methods of test for plane strain fracture toughness ($K_{IC}$) of metallic materials. 1997.
11 White SN, Yu Z. Physical properties of fixed prosthodontic, resin composite luting agents. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:384-9.
12 Lloyd CH, Iannetta RV. The fracture toughness of dental composites. I. The development of strength and fracture toughness. J Oral Rehabil 1982;9:55-66.   DOI
13 Ilie N, Hickel R, Valceanu AS, Huth KC. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:489-98.   DOI
14 Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:104-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Cook WD, Moopnar M. Influence of chemical structure on the fracture behaviour of dimethacrylate composite resins. Biomaterials 1990;11:272-6.   DOI
16 Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180-7.   DOI   ScienceOn