Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.2.74

In vitro study of microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with different adhesive systems and fiber-reinforced posts  

Park, Joon-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.52, no.2, 2014 , pp. 74-81 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: While studies have examined microleakage in endodontically treated teeth restored with posts, microleakage among post and adhesive systems remains a concern. This study compared the sealing properties of 3 adhesively luted post systems. Materials and methods: Thirty-six endodontically treated permanent maxillary central incisors were divided into 3 groups: Zirconia-glass fiber, Quartz-glass fiber, Polyethylene fiber posts. Post space was prepared and each post was adhesively luted with 3 systems. The specimens were separately immersed in freshly prepared 2% methylene blue solution for 1 week. The cleaned specimens were then embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin. The root portion of tooth were horizontally sectioned into three pieces (apical, middle, and coronal portions). An occlusal view of each section was digitally photographed with a stereomicroscope. The methylene blue-infiltrated surface for each specimen was measured. Dye penetration was estimated as the ratio of the methylene blue-infiltrated surface to the total dentin surface. Results: No significant differences were found among post types. The variables of middle section and 3-stage adhesive produced significant differences in microleakage between the following post pairs: zirconia-glass fiber versus quartz-glass fiber, zirconia-glass fiber versus polyethylene fiber, and quartz-glass fiber versus polyethylene fiber (P<.05). There were significant differences between the apical and coronal sections of each post type, and between apical versus middle sections of quarze-glass fiber and polyethylene fiber posts (P<.05). Conclusion: No significant differences were found among post types. The 3-stage adhesive produced significant differences in microleakage between the following post pairs.
Keywords
Fiber-reinforced post; Adhesive systems; Microleakage; Resin cement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:31-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:105-8.   DOI
3 Swartz DB, Skidmore AE, Griffin JA Jr. Twenty years of endodontic success and failure. J Endod 1983;9:198-202.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Demirel F, Saygili G, Sahmali S. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with prefabricated posts and tooth-colored restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:73-9.
5 Drummond JL, Bapna MS. Static and cyclic loading of fiberreinforced dental resin. Dent Mater 2003;19:226-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcl′a-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13:15B-18B.
7 Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:5-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-8.
9 Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater 2002;18:495-502.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive postendodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002;18:596-602.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-35.
12 Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005;31:608-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Pirani C, Chersoni S, Foschi F, Piana G, Loushine RJ, Tay FR, Prati C. Does hybridization of intraradicular dentin really improve fiber post retention in endodontically treated teeth? J Endod 2005;31:891-4.   DOI
14 Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002;18:609-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Erkut S, Gulsahi K, Caglar A, Imirzalioglu P, Karbhari VM, Ozmen I. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Oper Dent 2008;33:96-105.   DOI
16 Segerstro¨m S, Astba¨ck J, Ekstrand KD. A retrospective long term study of teeth restored with prefabricated carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. Swed Dent J 2006;30:1-8.
17 Usumez A, Cobankara FK, Ozturk N, Eskitascioglu G, Belli S. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:163-9.   DOI
18 Akkayan B, Gu¨lmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003;19:199-205.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ravanshad S, Ghoreeshi N. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in endodontically-treated teeth restored with posts. Aust Endod J 2003;29:128-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Eskitaccioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28:629-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Pilot study of the cyclic fatigue characteristics of five endodontic posts with four core materials. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27: 83-92.   DOI
24 Chersoni S, Acquaviva GL, Prati C, Ferrari M, Grandini S, Pashley DH, Tay FR. In vivo fluid movement through dentin adhesives in endodontically treated teeth. J Dent Res 2005;84: 223-7.   DOI
25 Tjan AH, Grant BE, Dunn JR. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:24-9.   DOI
26 Lambjerg-Hansen H, Asmussen E. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:882-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Bachicha WS, DiFiore PM, Miller DA, Lautenschlager EP, Pashley DH. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with posts. J Endod 1998;24:703-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Wu MK, Pehlivan Y, Kontakiotis EG, Wesselink PR. Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:264-9.   DOI
29 Mannocci F, Qualtrough AJ, Worthington HV, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results. Oper Dent 2005;30:9-15.
30 Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on bonding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17:422-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Effect of dentin conditioning on retention of airborne-particle-abraded, adhesively luted glass fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:367-73.   DOI
32 Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-16.
33 Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:284-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Jung SH, Min KS, Chang HS, Park SD, Kwon SN, Bae JM. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:270-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Goto Y, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Junge T. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-andcore systems. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:45-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Yang B, Ludwig K, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 2006;22:45-56.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J 1995;28:12-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Fogel HM. Microleakage of posts used to restore endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1995;21:376-9.   DOI