Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.2.119

Finite element analysis on the connection types of abutment and fixture  

Jung, Byeong-Hyeon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Lee, Gyeong-Je (Department of Dentistry, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
Kang, Dong-Wan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.50, no.2, 2012 , pp. 119-127 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to compare the stress distribution pattern of abutment-fixture connection area using 3-dimensional finite element model analysis when 5 different implant systems which have internal connection. Materials and methods: For the analysis, a finite element model of implant was designed to locate at first molar area. Stress distribution was observed when vertical load of 200 N was applied at several points on the occlusal surfaces of the implants, including center, points 1.5 mm, 3.0 mm away from center and oblique load of 200 N was applied $30^{\circ}$ inclined to the implant axis. The finite element model was analyzed by using of 3G. Author (PlassoTech, California, USA). Results: The DAS tech implant (internal step with no taper) showed more favorable stress distribution than other internally connected implants. AS compare to the situations when the loading was applied within the boundary of implants and an oblique loading was applied, it showed higher equivalent stress and equivalent elastic strain when the loading was applied beyond the boundary of implants. Regardless of loading condition, the abutments showed higher equivalent stress and equivalent elastic strain than the fixtures. Conclusion: When the occlusal contact is afforded, the distribution of stress varies depending on the design of connection area and the location of loading. More favorable stress distribution is expected when the contact load was applied within the diameter of fixtures and the DAS tech implant (internal step with no tapering) has more benefits than the other design of internally connected implants.
Keywords
Dental Implants; 3 Dimensional Finite Element Analysis; Occlusal Force; Internal Connection Implant; Implant-Abutment Connection;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Anand SC, Schuessler R. Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. J Dent Res 1976;55:772-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ahn JK, Kay KS, Chung CH. Finite element stress analysis of implant prosthesis with internal connection between the implant and the abutment. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:356-72.
4 Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:99-108.
5 Carlsson GE, Haraldson T. Functional response. In: Branemark PI. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. (Eds) Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 4th ed. Chicago; Quintessence; 1986. p. 74-8.
6 Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 6th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 1980. p. 60-1.
7 Lee HS, Kim MR, Park JM, Kim SJ. A 3-dimensional finite element analysis of tapered internal connection implant system (Avana SS III(R)) on different abutment connections. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:181-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Ban JH, Shin SW, Kim SJ, Lee JY. Three-dimensional finite element analysis on stress distribution of the mandibular implant- supported cantilever prostheses depending on the designs. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:70-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
10 Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326-34.
11 Kwon JH, Choi MH, Kim YL, Cho HW. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of single implant restoration using different fixture and abutment screw diameters. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:105-19.
12 Yu SH, Park WH, Park JJ, Lee YS. A study on the various implant systems using the finite element stress analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006;44:207-16.
13 Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implantabutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-26.
14 Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: a retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:51-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36.
16 Levine RA, Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG Jr, Higginbottom F, Saunders SL. A multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: preliminary results at 6 or more months of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:237-42.
17 Han SU, Park HO, Yang HS. stress analysis of supporting tissues and implants according to implant fixture shapes and implant-abutment connections. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:226-37.
18 Levine RA, Clem D, Beagle J, Ganeles J, Johnson P, Solnit G, Keller GW. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solidscrew ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:550-6.
19 Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:581-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in fullarch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-78.
23 Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Branemark single tooth implants: a preliminary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:274-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Kim KT, Jo KH, Lee CH, Yu WJ, Lee KB. Cervical design effect of dental implant on stress distribution in crestal cortical bone studied by finite element analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:385-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Boggan RS, Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW. Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:436-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implantabutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-26.
27 Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A prospective study on the maintenance of implant prostheses in private practice. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:453-8.
28 Kim YL, Cho HW, Lee JB. Three dimensional finite element analysis of internally connected implant systems. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006:44:85-102.
29 Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds.): Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago; Quintessence; 1985.
30 Adell R, Lekholm U, Pockler B, Branemark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.   DOI
31 Duyck J, Naert IE, Van Oosterwyck H, Van der Sloten J, De Cooman M, Lievens S, Puers B. Biomechanics of oral implants: a review of the literature. Technol Health Care 1997;5:253-273.
32 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P-I, Lidhe J, Eriksson B, Sbordone L. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I) A 3 year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Surg 1986;15:39-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue- integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:59-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Block MS, Gardiner D, Kent JN, Misiek DJ, Finger IM, Guerra L. Hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants in the posterior mandible: 10-year observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:626-33.
36 van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, Higuchi K, Laney W, Linden U, Astrand P. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:272-81.
37 Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85-97.
38 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94.   DOI   ScienceOn