Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.2.106

Surface roughness and $Candida$ $albicans$ adhesion to flexible denture base according to various polishing methods  

Oh, Ju-Won (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Dental School, Chonbuk National University)
Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Dental School, Chonbuk National University)
Ahn, Seung-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Dental School, Chonbuk National University)
Park, Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Dental School, Chonbuk National University)
Kang, Cheol-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Dental School, Chonbuk National University)
Song, Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Dental School, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.50, no.2, 2012 , pp. 106-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of 3 chairside polishing methods and laboratory polishing methods on surface roughness and $C.$ $albicans$ adhesion of polyamide denture base. Materials and methods: Using contact profilometer, the surface of polyamide specimens ($25{\times}15{\times}2mm$) was studied after conventional polishing without finishing and after chiarside polishing with 2 chiarside polishing kits and chairside-pumice polishing following finishing with tungsten carbide bur. To evaluate the adhesion of $C.$ $albicans$, $C.$ $albicans$ suspension was overlayed on the test specimen. And the specimens were incubated for 2 hours. Imprint culture method was achieved and counted the colony on the agar plate. Polished polyamide were evaluated using a scanning electron microscope. The statistics were conducted using one-way ANOVA and in case of difference, Scheffe test and Tamhane's T2 test were used. Results: Surface roughness (Ra) of surfaces polished with 2 chairside polishing kits had higher than conventional polishing and pumice polishing. The highest roughness value was $0.32{\pm}0.10{\mu}m$, and the lowest was $0.02{\pm}0.00{\mu}m$. The adhesion of $C.$ $albicans$ on the specimens polished with chairside polishing group and pumice polishing group were increased than conventional polishing group ($P$<.01). Conclusion: Conventional laboratory polishing was found to produce the smoothest surface and the lowest adhesion of $C.$ $albicans$. Two groups polished with Chairside polishing kits were similar with respect to surface roughness. Surface of the specimen polished with pumice is significantly smoother than 2 chairside polishing groups, but the result of $C.$ $albicans$ adhesion is that group polished with pumice was similar with 2 chairside polishing groups ($P$>.01).
Keywords
Polyamide denture base; Profilometer; Surface roughness; Polishing;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rotrosen D, Calderone RA, Edwards JE Jr. Adherence of Candida species to host tissues and plastic surfaces. Rev Infect Dis 1986;8:73-85.   DOI
2 Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22: 1-14.
4 Yamauchi M, Yamamoto K, Wakabayashi M, Kawano J. In vitro adherence of microorganisms to denture base resin with different surface texture. Dent Mater J 1990;9:19-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kuhar M, Funduk N. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:76-85.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Radford DR, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Denture plaque and adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials in vivo and in vitro. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10:99-116.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:169-78.
8 Renu T, Saurabh G, Samarth KA. Denture base materials: From past to future. Indian J Dent Sci 2010;2:33-9.
9 Choi B, Kim SH, Lee W. Valplast(R) flexible removable partial denture for a patient with medically compromised conditions : a clinical report. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:295-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Maurice N. Stern esthetic retention for modern dental prosthesis. NY state Dent J 1964;30:53-6.
11 Abuzar MA, Bellur S, Duong N, Kim BB, Lu P, Palfreyman N, Surendran D, Tran VT. Evaluating surface roughness of a polyamide denture base material in comparison with poly (methyl methacrylate). J Oral Sci 2010;52:577-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Daniluk T, Tokajuk G, Stokowska W, Fiedoruk K, Sciepuk M, Zaremba ML, Rozkiewicz D, Cylwik-Rokicka D, Kedra BA, Anielska I, Gorska M, Kedra BR. Occurrence rate of oral Candida albicans in denture wearer patients. Adv Med Sci 2006;51:77-80.
13 Radford DR, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Denture plaque and adherence of Candida albicans to denture-base materials in vivo and in vitro. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1999;10:99-116.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Takabayashi Y. Characteristics of denture thermoplastic resins for non-metal clasp dentures. Dent Mater J 2010;29:353-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamamoto T. Denture plaque-past and recent concerns. J Dent 1998;26:299-304.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hoepelman IM, Dupont B. Oral candidiasis: the clinical challenge of resistance and management. Int J Antimicrob Agents 1996;6:155-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Webb BC, Thomas CJ, Willcox MD, Harty DW, Knox KW. Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Aetiology and management: a review. Part 1. Factors influencing distribution of Candida species in the oral cavity. Aust Dent J 1998;43:45-50.   DOI   ScienceOn