Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.3.254

Review of the developmental trend of implant surface modification using organic biomaterials  

Hwang, Sung-Taek (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Korea University Ansan Hospital)
Han, In-Ho (Cellbiocontrol Laboratory, Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Institute for Dental Research, Korea University, Korea University Guro Hospital)
Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kang, Jeong-Kyung (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Seoul Veterans Hospital)
Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Korea University Ansan Hospital)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.49, no.3, 2011 , pp. 254-262 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate and prospect for current research trend and developmental perspectives via analyzing recent biomaterial coated-implants study. Materials and methods: To investigate each subject respectively, several biomaterials that are using for implant surface coating were set as 'keywords'. By these keywords, major research groups in each subject were chosen, and research trend of them was analyzed. Trend of In vivo studies that examined selected biomaterials were analyzed to evaluate commercial potential. Results: The collagen research accounted for 40% of total implant study, which was the highest, and fibronectin, BMPs (bone morphogenetic proteins) and RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp) peptides followed, which were ranked in descending order. Furthermore, figures of all four research subjects were also increased with time, especially a sharp increase in RGD research. According to the results of major research group, collagen that was combined with other organic and inorganic biomaterials was mostly examined, rather than using collagen only. Major research groups investigating BMPs mostly focused on rhBMP-2. In animal studies, collagen was used as resorbable membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR) or drug carrier, while BMPs were used with bone graft materials or coating material for titanium implant surface. Conclusion: There is not consistency of results even in identical subjects research field. Many studies are ongoing to optimize combination between mechanical surface treatment and biomaterials such as extracellular matrix component and growth factors.
Keywords
Dental implant; Surface modification; Biomolecule; Extracellular matrix; Growth factor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Salata LA, Burgos PM, Rasmusson L, Novaes AB, Papalexiou V, Dahlin C, Sennerby L. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:62-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Zhang Y, Shi B, Li C, Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhang W, Luo T, Cheng X. The synergetic bone-forming effects of combinations of growth factors expressed by adenovirus vectors on chitosan/collagen scaffolds. J Control Release 2009;136:172-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Leknes KN, Yang J, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Susin C, Wikesjo UM. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7/rhOP-1): radiographic observations. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:914-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Leknes KN, Yang J, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Susin C, Wikesjo UM. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: radiographic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1027-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kasemo B, Gold J. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:8-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Chang PC, Lang NP, Giannobile WV. Evaluation of functional dynamics during osseointegration and regeneration associated with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:185-206.   DOI
8 Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, Thompson VP, Lemons JE. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:579-96.
9 Kim TI, Jang JH, Kim HW, Knowles JC, Ku Y. Biomimetic approach to dental implants. Curr Pharm Des 2008;14:2201-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Ostman PO. Immediate/early loading of dental implants. Clinical documentation and presentation of a treatment concept. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:90-112.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94.
12 Esposito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007;4: Art. No.: CD003815.
13 Baas J, Elmengaard B, Jensen TB, Jakobsen T, Andersen NT, Soballe K. The effect of pretreating morselized allograft bone with rhBMP-2 and/or pamidronate on the fixation of porous Ti and HAcoated implants. Biomaterials 2008;29:2915-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
15 Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F. Tissue reaction to an implant of a titanium hollow cylinder with a titanium surface spray layer. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1976;86:713-27.
16 Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.   DOI