Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.2.152

Volume difference in upper central incisor preparation according to the changes of restorative design and marginal location  

Kim, Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Park, Young-Bum (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Sung-Tae (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.49, no.2, 2011 , pp. 152-160 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric change of teeth after preparation for various designs and margin locations through Micro CT analysis (Skyscan 1076: SKYSCAN, Konitch, Belgium). Materials and methods: The 36 artificial teeth were used to determine reduction volume of upper central incisor. According to the restorative design these 36 teeth were divided into 4 groups and according to the marginal location each group was divided into 3 subgroups. The volume of unprepared teeth was obtained by using Micro CT and the volume of prepared teeth was obtained in the same method. The CT scanned images before and after preparation were superimposed. Results: The volume difference was significantly increased as follows: traditional laminate veneer < full laminate veneer < all ceramic crown < metal ceramic crown. One-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison analyses were used to analyze the data in this study. In each group the volume difference was significantly increased as follows: 1 mm above CEJ < CEJ < 1 mm below CEJ (P<.05). The % volume difference of all ceramic crown and metal ceramic crown was 31 - 48% and that of laminate veneer was 14 - 30%. The volume difference of the traditional laminate veneer was 1/3 of that of metal ceramic crown. The full laminate (1 mm below CEJ) and all ceramic crown (1 mm above CEJ) showed a similar volume difference. Metal ceramic crown showed 13.7% more volume difference than all ceramic crown. Conclusion: There exists the difference in volumetric change according to designs of restoration and margin locations of preparation.
Keywords
Micro CT; Restorative design; Marginal location; Volume difference;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. ive-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998;29:211-21.
2 Morse DR. Age-related changes of the dental pulp complex and their relationship to systemic aging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;72:721-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Crispin BJ. Esthetic moieties: enamel thickness. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:37.   DOI
5 Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:472-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Magne P, Douglas WH. Additive contour of porcelain veneers: a key element in enamel preservation, adhesion, and esthetics for aging dentition. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:81-92.
7 Jones JC. The success rate of anterior crowns. Br Dent J 1972;132:399-403.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Wolf JE, Hakala PE, Kolehmainen L, Jarvinen V. A follow-up study of porcelain and acrylic jacket crowns. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1978;74:54-8.
9 Foster LV. Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice: clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases. Br Dent J 1990;168:199-201.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Zarone F, Epifania E, Leone G, Sorrentino R, Ferrari M. Dynamometric assessment of the mechanical resistance of porcelain veneers related to tooth preparation: a comparison between two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:354-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Stappert CF, Ozden U, Gerds T, Strub JR. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:132-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Guess PC, Stappert CF. Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. Dent Mater 2008;24:804-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Atsu SS, Aka PS, Kucukesmen HC, Kilicarslan MA, Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:336-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-7.
15 Murray PE, Stanley HR, Matthews JB, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ. Age-related odontometric changes of human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:474-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:1395-401.   DOI
17 Doyle MG, Goodacre CJ, Munoz CA, Andres CJ. The effect of tooth preparation design on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns: 3. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:327-40.
18 Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Scharer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress full-porcelain crowns. J Prosthodont 1997;6:20-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Sorensen JA, Choi C, Fanuscu MI, Mito WT. IPS Empress crown system: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc 1998;26:130-6.
20 Fradeani M, Aquilano A. Clinical experience with Empress crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:241-7.
21 Christensen GJ. Has tooth structure been replaced? J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:103-5.   DOI
22 Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review. Br Dent J 1988;164:9-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Kress B, Buhl Y, Hahnel S, Eggers G, Sartor K, Schmitter M. Age-and tooth-related pulp cavity signal intensity changes in healthy teeth: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:134-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:9-18.
25 Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:407-13.
26 Ericson S, Hedegard B, Wennstrom A. Roentgenographic study of vital abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:981-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-9.   DOI   ScienceOn