Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.1.29

Patients satisfaction for implant supported overdenture with small diameter implant  

Lee, Sang-Yeup (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Choi, Dae-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Paek, Jang-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Kwon, Kung-Rock (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.49, no.1, 2011 , pp. 29-37 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: In cases when implant supported overdenture is made by using standard size implant, additional procedure such as bone surgery and bone grafting can be required. And it gives burden to doctor and patient in terms of cost. Therefore, it is necessary to find the implant therapy for the edentulous patients in making denture with accordable cost and simple procedure. Materials and methods: Edentulous patients with upper and lower dentures participated in this study. Before the operation, survey about patient's satisfaction to the existing dentures was carried out. Surgical procedures included four small diameter implants installation anterior area and immediate loading. One and three month after the procedure, the same survey about patient's satisfaction was carried out, and radiography was taken. Results: We are doing research to the nine patients. Survival rate is 97.2 percent. The comparison of patient's satisfaction before and after surgery is performed based on oral health impact profile 49. We analyze mainly with masticatory discomfort, retention, aesthetics, social problem, psychological discomfort problems. As a result, satisfaction level is increased at all factors. Retention is the most increased satisfactory factor followed by mastication difficulty, pronunciation, psychological discomfort, social discomfort, aesthetics in order. Marginal bone loss is 0.21 mm at 12 weeks after implant placement. Conclusion: This research reveals that the denture supported by mini dental implant increases patient's satisfaction. This study will be continued with more patients for a long time and we are scheduled for taking additional radiography to check whether peri-implant bone resorption occurs or not.
Keywords
Completely edentulous patients; Implant-supported mandibular ovedentures; Mini dental implant; Immediate function; Immediate loading;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 JofreJ, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of mini-implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:243-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: a 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:91-100.
3 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.   DOI
4 Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-98.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kim JW, Kim HS, Baik J, Kwon KR. Novel treatment modality of implant-retained overdenture for immediate function in completely edentulous patients. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:34- 47.
6 Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994;11:3-11.
7 Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Griffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:81- 4.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Shatkin TE, Shatkin S, Oppenheimer BD, Oppenheimer AJ. Mini dental implants for long-term fixed and removable prosthetics: a retrospective analysis of 2514 implants placed over a five-year period. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:92-9.
10 Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:12-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Dilek O, Tezulas E, Dincel M. Required minimum primary stability and torque values for immediate loading of mini dental implants: an experimental study in nonviable bovine femoral bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:20-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53: 1167-73.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Porter JM. Same-day restoration of mandibular single-stage implants. J Indiana Dent Assoc 2002;81:22-5.
14 Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Mini-dental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:32-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Vigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter implants in single-tooth and multiple-implant restorations: a 7-year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:703-9.
16 Christensen GJ. The 'mini'-implant has arrived. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:387-90.   DOI
17 Choi R. Incorporating mini-implants within the general dental practice. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007;19:1-5.
18 English CE, Bohle GC. Diagnostic, procedural and clinical issues with Sendax mini dental implant. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:3-25.
19 Lekholm U, Zarb GA: Patient selection and preparation. In: Braemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds): Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence; Chicago; 1985. pp. 199-209.
20 Flanagan D. Implant-supported fixed prosthetic treatment using very small-diameter implants: a case report. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:34- 7.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW. Ten-year longitudinal study of masticatory function in edentulous patients treated with fixed complete dentures on osseointegrated implants. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:448- 53.
22 Sendax VI. Mini-implants as adjuncts for transitional prostheses. Dent Implantol Update 1996;7:12-5.
23 Gibney JW. Minimally invasive implant surgery. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:73-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Horiuchi K, Uchida H, Yamamoto K, Sugimura M. Immediate loading of Branemark system implants following placement in edentulous patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:824-30.
25 Banton B, Henry MD. Overdenture retention and stabilization with ball-and-socket attachments: principles and technique. J Dent Technol 1997;14:14-20.
26 Redford M, Drury TF, Kingman A, Brown LJ. Denture use and the technical quality of dental prostheses among persons 18-74 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75:714-25.   DOI
27 Tarbet WJ, Boone M, Schmidt NF. Effect of a denture adhesive on complete denture dislodgement during mastication. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:374-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, van't Hof MA, van Oort RP, Vissink A. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:195-201.   DOI   ScienceOn