1 |
Beynon AD, Wood BA. Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986;70: 177-93.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163-77.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Relative gap formation of resin-cemented ceramic inlays and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:374-8.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Schneider PM, Messer LB, Douglas WH. The effect of enamel surface reduction in vitro on the bonding of composite resin to permanent human enamel. J Dent Res 1981;60:895-900.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Lacy AM, Wada C, Du W, Watanabe L. In vitro microleakage at the gingival margin of porcelain and resin veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:7-10.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Zaimoglu A, Karaagaçlioglu L. Microleakage in porcelain laminate veneers. J Dent 1991;19:369-72.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Zaimooglu A, Karaăgacliŏglu L, Ucta¸sli. Influence of porcelain material and composite luting resin on microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:319-27.
DOI
|
8 |
Sim C, Neo J, Chua EK, Tan BY. The effect of dentin bonding agents on the microleakage of porcelain veneers. Dent Mater 1994;10:278-81.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Atsu SS, Aka PS, Kucukesmen HC, Kilicarslan MA, Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:336-41.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Grine FE, Stevens NJ, Jungers WL. An evaluation of dental radiograph accuracy in the measurement of enamel thickness. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:1117-25.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Harris EF, Hicks JD. A radiographic assessment of enamel thickness in human maxillary incisors. Arch Oral Biol 1998;43:825-31.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Stroud JL, English J, Buschang PH. Enamel thickness of the posterior dentition: its implications for nonextraction treatment. Angle Orthod 1998;68:141-6.
|
13 |
Freidman MJ. Augmenting restorative dentistry with porcelain veneers. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:29-34.
DOI
|
14 |
Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd Ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997, p. 441.
|
15 |
Christensen GJ. Veneering of teeth. State of the art. Dent Clin North Am 1985;29:373-91.
|
16 |
Clyde JS, Gilmour A. Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review. Br Dent J 1988;164:9-14.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Tjan AH, Dunn JR, Sanderson IR. Microleakage patterns of porcelain and castable ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:276-82.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:407-13.
|
19 |
Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:503-9.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Christensen GJ. Has tooth structure been replaced? J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:103-5.
DOI
|
21 |
Walls AW, Steele JG, Wassell RW. Crowns and other extracoronal restorations: porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J 2002;193:73-6, 79-82.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Sheets CG, Taniguchi T. Advantages and limitations in the use of porcelain veneer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:406-11.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Hui KK, Williams B, Davis EH, Holt RD. A comparative assessment of the strengths of porcelain veneers for incisor teeth dependent on their design characteristics. Br Dent J 1991;171:51-5.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Huysmans MC, Thijssen JM. Ultrasonic measurement of enamel thickness: a tool for monitoring dental erosion? J Dent 2000;28:187-91.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Kedici PS, Kalipcilar B, Bilir OG. Effect of glass ionomer liners on bonding strength of laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:29-32.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Chpindel P, Cristou M. Tooth preparation and fabrication of porcelain veneers using a double-layer technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:19-28.
|
27 |
Garber D. Porcelain laminate veneers: ten years later. Part I: Tooth preparation. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:56-62.
|
28 |
Stroud JL, Buschang PH, Goaz PW. Sexual dimorphism in mesiodistal dentin and enamel thickness. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:169-71.
DOI
|
29 |
Scotti R, Villa L, Carossa S. Clinical applicability of the radiographic method for determining the thickness of calcified crown tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:65-7.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Barber FE, Lees S, Lobene RR. Urasonic pulse-echo measurements in teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1969;14:745-60.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Schwartz GT, Thackeray JF, Reid C, van Reenan JF. Enamel thickness and the topography of the enamel-dentine junction in South African Plio-Pleistocene hominids with special reference to the Carabelli trait. J Hum Evol 1998;35:523-42.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
32 |
Olejniczak AJ, Grine FE. Assessment of the accuracy of dental enamel thickness measurements using microfocal X-ray computed tomography. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2006;288:263-75.
|
33 |
Piemjai M, Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont 2007;16:457-64.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Nakamura T, Miyamae M, Koh N, Hino T, Maruyama T. Adhesive strength between teeth and resin cements for porcelain laminate veneer. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1992;32:21-6.
|
35 |
Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II-Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:9-18.
|
36 |
Horn HR. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1983;27:671-84.
|
37 |
Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: the current state of the art. Quintessence Int 1985;16:5-12.
|
38 |
Weinberg LA. Tooth preparation for porcelain laminates. N Y State Dent J 1989;55:25-8.
|