Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.4.294

Accuracy of 5-axis precision milling for guided surgical template  

Park, Ji-Man (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Yi, Tae-Kyoung (Seoul Jo-Eun Dental Clinic)
Jung, Je-Kyo (Seoul Jo-Eun Dental Clinic)
Kim, Yong (Department of Implant Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University)
Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Han, Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Koak, Jai-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Seong-Kyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.48, no.4, 2010 , pp. 294-300 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The template-guided implant surgery offers several advantages over the traditional approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of coordinate synchronization procedure with 5-axis milling machine for surgical template fabrication by means of reverse engineering through universal CAD software. Materials and methods: The study was performed on ten edentulous models with imbedded gutta percha stoppings which were hidden under silicon gingival form. The platform for synchordination was formed on the bottom side of models and these casts were imaged in Cone beam CT. Vectors of stoppings were extracted and transferred to those of planned implant on virtual planning software. Depth of milling process was set to the level of one half of stoppings and the coordinate of the data was synchronized to the model image. Synchronization of milling coordinate was done by the conversion process for the platform for the synchordination located on the bottom of the model. The models were fixed on the synchordination plate of 5-axis milling machine and drilling was done as the planned vector and depth based on the synchronized data with twist drill of the same diameter as GP stopping. For the 3D rendering and image merging, the impression tray was set on the conbeam CT and pre- and post- CT acquiring was done with the model fixed on the impression body. The accuracy analysis was done with Solidworks (Dassault systems, Concord, USA) by measuring vector of stopping’s top and bottom centers of experimental model through merging and reverse engineering the planned and post-drilling CT image. Correlations among the parameters were tested by means of Pearson correlation coefficient and calculated with SPSS (release 14.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA) ($\alpha$ = 0.05). Results: Due to the declination, GP remnant on upper half of stoppings was observed for every drilled bores. The deviation between planned image and drilled bore that was reverse engineered was 0.31 (0.15 - 0.42) mm at the entrance, 0.36 (0.24 - 0.51) mm at the apex, and angular deviation was 1.62 (0.54 - 2.27)$^{\circ}$. There was positive correlation between the deviation at the entrance and that at the apex (Pearson Correlation Coefficient = 0.904, P = .013). Conclusion: The coordinate synchronization 5-axis milling procedure has adequate accuracy for the production of the guided surgical template.
Keywords
Computer-guided surgery; Implant surgical template; Milling machine; Reverse engineering;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:305-13.
2 Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, Blanchet E. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:298-304.
3 Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:886-93.
4 Naitoh M, Ariji E, Okumura S, Ohsaki C, Kurita K, Ishigami T. Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:409-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Schermeier O, Lueth T, Cho C, Hildebrand D, Klein M, Nelson K. The precision of the RoboDent system- An in vitro study. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG. Computer-assisted Radiology and Surgery, New York: Springer; 2002, p.947-52.
6 Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:731-4.
7 Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spu¨ntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:709-16.
8 Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7.
9 Schmitt SM, Chance DA. Fabrication of titanium implant-retained restorations with nontraditional machining techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:332-6.
10 Lee WJ, Hong YS, Lee YH. An Implementation Scheme for Rapid Prototyping Systems. Trans of the KSME 1993;33:297-310.
11 Lee SH, Chang IT, Yim SH. Dimensional accuracy of denture base using laser scanner of reverse engineering technic. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:167-84.
12 Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
13 Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional conebeam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816-21.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Verstreken K, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Predictability of a three-dimensional planning system for oral implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:105-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G, Reinert S. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:609-14.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Eggers G, Patellis E, Mu¨hling J. Accuracy of template-based dental implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:447-54.
17 Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. 1973. Br J Radiol 1995;68:H166-72.
18 Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lorme′e J, Coudert JL. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:300-3.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on conebeam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:651-6.   DOI   ScienceOn