Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.3.215

Influence of microthread design on marginal cortical bone strain developement: A finite element analysis  

Chun, Seung-Geun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Cho, Jin-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Jo, Kwang-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.48, no.3, 2010 , pp. 215-223 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The present study was aimed to evaluate the level of cortical bone strain during the placement of an implant. The primary concern was to investigate if the extent of overloading area near the marginal bone could be affected by microthread fabricated at the cervical 1/3 of an implant. Materials and methods: Three dimensional finite element analysis was used to simulate the insertion of 3 implants. Control model was $4.1{\times}10$ mm implant (Submerged model, Dentis Co,, Daegu, Korea) equipped with a main thread only. Type I was with main thread and microthread, and Type II had similar thread pattern but was of tapered body. A PC-based finite element software (DEFORM 3D ver 5, SFTC, Columbus, OH, USA) was used to calculate a total of 3,600 steps of analysis, which simulated the whole insertion. Results: Results showed that the strain field in the marginal bone within 1 mm of the implant wall was higher than 4,000 micro-strain in the control model. The size of bone overloading was 1-1.5 mm in Type I, and greater than 2 mm in Type II implants. Conclusion: These results indicate that the marginal bone may be at the risk of resorption on receiving the implant for all 3 implant models studied. Yet, the risk was greater for Type I and Type II implants, which had microthread at the cervical 1/3.
Keywords
Implant; Microthread design; Finite element method;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rasmusson L, Kahnberg KE, Tan A. Effects of implant design and surface on bone regeneration and implant stability: an experimental study in the dog mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:2-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Duyck J, Ronold HJ, van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999: p.337.
4 Han SU, Vang MS, Yang HS, Park SW, Park HO, Lim HP. Stress analysis of supporting tissues according to implant fixture diameter and residual alveolar bone width. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:506-21.   과학기술학회마을
5 Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol 1998;24:80-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Hi mmlova L, Dosta lova T, KacovskyA, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:20-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Jeong HC. Three dimensional finite element analysis of cortical bone strain induced by insertion of self tapping implant. Doctorate Thesis, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, 2008.
8 Yu W, Jang YJ, Kyung HM. Combined influence of implant diameter and alveolar ridge width on crestal bone stress: a quantitative approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:88-95.
9 Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;208:108-13.
10 Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;43:192-203.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Maniatopoulos C, Pilliar RM, Smith DC. Threaded versus poroussurfaced designs for implant stabilization in bone-endodontic implant model. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:1309-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Van de Velde T, Collaert B, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:134-41.
13 Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:465-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gotfredsen K. A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:1-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:179-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
17 Kwon MA, Kim YD, Jeong CM, Lee JY. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implants with dual-microthread: 1-year study. J Korea Acad Periodontol 2009;39:27-36.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Grondahl K. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: a prospective comparative study of Astra Tech and Branemark system implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Grondahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Branemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:413-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Li YF. Comparative and analysis study of peri-implant bone stress around Rescue implant and standard implant using finite element method. Masters thesis, Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, 2009.
21 Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-88.
22 Chung JM, Jo KH, Lee CH, Yu WJ, Lee KB. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone stress influenced by cervical module configuration of endosseous implant. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:394-405.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, Wang HL. Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal bone stress levels: a finite element analysis. J Periodontol 2008;79:2166-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Saab XE, Griggs JA, Powers JM, Engelmeier RL. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:85-92.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:286-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Frost HM. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 2003;275:1081-101.
29 Hansson S. Implant-abutment interface: biomechanical study of flat top versus conical. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:33-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 1985;37:411-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ, Chung JP, Rhyu IC, Choi YC, Baik HK, Ku Y, Kim MH. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:565-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech 2003;36:1247-58.   DOI   ScienceOn