Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.4.435

The influence of magnet on tissue healing after immediate implantation in fresh extraction sites in dogs  

Yu, Seok-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.47, no.4, 2009 , pp. 435-444 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: The clinical use of electric and electomagnetic fields for fracture healing applications began in the early 1970s. Since then, several technologies have been developed and shown to promote healing of fractures. Developments of these devices have been aided in recent years by basic research and several well controlled clinical trials not only in the medical field but in dentistry. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare alveolar bone reduction following immediate implantation using implants onto which magnets were attached in fresh extracted sockets. Material and methods: Four mongrel dogs were involved. Full buccal and lingual mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated and third and fourth premolars of the mandible were removed. Implants with magnets and implants without magnets were installed in the fresh extracted sockets and after 3 months of healing the animals were sacrificed. The mandibles were dissected and each implant sites were sampled and processed for histological examination. Results: The marginal gaps that were present between the implant and walls of the sockets at the implantation stage disappeared in both groups as a result of bone fill and resorption of the bone crest. The buccal bone crests were located apical of its lingual counterparts. At the 12 week interval the mean of marginal bone resorption in the control group was significantly higher than that of the magnet group. The majority of specimens in magnet group presented early bone formation and less resorption of the buccal marginal bone compared to the control group. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it could be concluded that implants with magnets attached in the early stages of implantation may provide more favorable conditions for early bone formation and reduce resorption and remodeling of marginal bone.
Keywords
Immediate placement; Magnet; Bone remodeling;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bassett CA, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science 1974;184:575-7   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Bassett CAL, Mitchell SN, Norton L, Pilla AA. A nonoperative salvage of surgically resistant pseudoarthoses and nonunions by pulsing electromagnetic fields: A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1977;1245:128-43
3 Lee SM, Lee SB, Choi BB. Effect of magnetism (neodymium magnet) on growth factor receptors of osteoblast. J Korean Acad Stomato Func Occl 2003;19:87-96
4 Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occuring in the maxilla following tooth extraction. Australian Dent J 1969;14:241-4   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:332-43   PUBMED
6 Park MW, Lee SB, Kwon KR, Choi DG. The effect of magnetism (neodymium magnet) on bone formation around titanium implants inserted into the tibia of rabbit. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:519-27   과학기술학회마을   ScienceOn
7 Sullivan M, Casey DM, Alberico R, Litwin A, Schaaf NG. Hyperostosis in an orbital defect with craniofacial implants and open-field magnets: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:196-9   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-8   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ara$\jo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstr$\"{o}$m JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-52   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hwang YT, Lee SB, Choi DG, Choi BB. The change of bone formation according to magnetic intensity of magnet placed into titanium implant specimens. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:232-45   과학기술학회마을   ScienceOn
11 Ara$\jo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstr$\"{o}$m JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:615-24   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Atwood DA. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:810-25   DOI
13 Cho YW, Lee SB, Choi BB. The effect of magnetism (neodymium magnet) on activity of osteoblast. J Korean Acad Stomato Func Occl 2003;19:185-94
14 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Br$\aa$nemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416   DOI   PUBMED
15 Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
16 Brighton CT, Black J, Friedenberg ZB, Esterhai JL, Day LJ, Connolly JF. A multicenter study of the treatment of non-union with constant direct current. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:2-13   DOI   PUBMED
17 Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla after tooth extraction-part I. Normal healing. Australian Dent J 1963;8:428-33   DOI
18 Ara$\jo MG, Wennstr$\"{o}$m JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:606-14   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967;17:21-7   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Ara$\jo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Atwood DA. Some clinical factors related to rate of resorption of residual ridges. 1962. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:119-25   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 Yan QC, Tomita N, Ikada Y. Effects of static magnetic field on bone formation of rat femurs. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:397-402   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Kotani H, Kawaguchi H, Shimoaka T, Iwasaka M, Ueno S, Ozawa H, Nakamura K, Hoshi K. Strong static magnetic field stimulates bone formation to a definite orientation in vitro and in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:1814-21   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Ryaby JT. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;355:S205-15   PUBMED