Comparison of microleakage after load cycling for nanofilled composite resin fillings with or without flowable resin lining
![]() |
Han, Sun-Deok
(Department of Prosthodontics, Inha University)
Kim, Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Inha University) Choi, Ji-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, Inha University) Oh, Nam-Sik (Department of Prosthodontics, Inha University) Lee, Myung-Hyun (Institute of ceramic engineering and technology) |
1 | Jain P, Belcher M. Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. Am J Dent 2000;13:235-8 PUBMED ScienceOn |
2 | Wibowo G, Stockton L. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14:177-85 PUBMED ScienceOn |
3 | Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Investigation of self-etching dentin primers. Dent Mater 1989;5:408-10 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2004;29:100-4 PUBMED ScienceOn |
5 | Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resinbased composite in non-carious Class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000;25:46-50 PUBMED ScienceOn |
6 | Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:62-6 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26:60-9 PUBMED ScienceOn |
8 | Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Ritter AV. Direct resin-based composites: current recommendations for optimal clinical results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:481-2, 484-90 PUBMED |
10 | Frankenberger R, Roth S, Kr¨amer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Effect of preparation mode on Class II resin composite repair. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:559-64 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Ho ¨rstedt P. In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:77-83 DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Belli S, Orucoglu H, Yildirim C, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of fiber placement or flowable resin lining on microleakage in Class II adhesive restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:175-81 PUBMED ScienceOn |
13 | Lutz E, Krejci I, Oldenburg TR. Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique. Quintessence Int 1986;17:777-84 PUBMED ScienceOn |
14 | Huysmans MC, van der Varst PG, Lautenschlager EP, Monaghan P. The influence of simulated clinical handling on the flexural and compressive strength of posterior composite restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:116-20 DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Ward DH. Esthetic restoration of tooth structure using a nanofill composite system. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:252, 254, 256-7 PUBMED |
![]() |