Browse > Article

The Effect of Three Surface Sealants on Microleakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations  

Lee, Won-Cheol (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.47, no.2, 2009 , pp. 182-190 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: Microleakage at the occlusal and gingival margin of Class V cavities restored with composite resin has traditionally been considered an obstacle to successful restoration. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of three different surface sealants(Fortify, Permaseal and Biscover LV) on the marginal sealing of Class V light-activated composite resin restorations(Z250). Material and methods: Forty noncarious human premolars and molars extracted within a three-month period were selected. Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and gingival margin in cementum were prepared in both buccal and lingual surfaces. The teeth, randomly assigned in four groups with twenty cavities in each group, were restored with composite resin after applying an adhesive system(Clearfil SE bond). After the finishing and polishing procedures, the restorations were covered with a specific surface sealants, except for the control samples, which were not sealed. After placing restorations, the specimens were thermocycled, and immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for twenty four hours and sectioned longitudinally. The marginal microleakage was evaluated at the occlusal and gingival interfaces using a microscope and compared among the four groups using ANOVA test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test($\alpha$=0.05). Results: Statistical analysis showed that there was significantly less leakage when the surface sealants were used than there was in control group(P<.05). There were no significant differences of microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins among groups. There were no significant differences between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group. Fortify was not statistically different from control group at the gingival margin(P>.05). Conclusion: Application of surface sealants was an effective method of surface coating in reducing microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations. However, it is certain that some microleakage still occurred despite the application of surface sealants, especially gingival margins.
Keywords
microleakage; surface sealant; class V; fortify; permaseal; biscover LV;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:203-8   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Pameijer CH, Wendt SL Jr. Microleakage of' surface-sealing' materials. Am J Dent 1995;8:43-6   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 May KN Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:133-6   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:552-9   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low?viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 2002;33:450-6   PUBMED
6 Gordon M, Plasschaert AJ, Stark MM. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities. A comparative study in vitro. Dent Mater 1986;2:228-31   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: Effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater 1989;5:122-6   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:47-51   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Takeuchi CY, Orbegoso Flores VH, Palma Dibb RG, Panzeri H, Lara EH, Dinelli W. Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing. Oper Dent 2003;28:281-6   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Kim SW, Cho YB, Hong CU. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Korean J Conser Dent 2001;26:64-76   과학기술학회마을
11 Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 1991;22:565-73   PUBMED
12 Torstenson B, Oden A. Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composite. Dent Mater 1989;5:218-23   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Yang JS, Kim MH, Her S, Kim JG, Baik BJ. The effect of low-viscosity resin systems on marginal leakage of composite resin restorations. Korean J pedodontics 1997;24: 460-74   과학기술학회마을
14 Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1991;22:295-8   PUBMED
15 Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dent Mater 1993;9:108-13   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the result of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater 1996;12:342-9   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of a surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:251-5   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Erhardt MC, Magalhães CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:396-402   PUBMED   ScienceOn
19 Shortall AC. Microleakage, marginal adaptation and composite resin restorations. Br Dent J 1982;153:223-7   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:194-203   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low viscosity resin based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16:244-8   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 Goracci G, Mori G, Martinis LC. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996;27:355-62
23 Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:481-8   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Self-bonding polymers as surface coatings of restorative resins to prevent staining. J Clin Dent 2006;17:134-7   PUBMED   ScienceOn
25 Wendt SL, Mclnnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181-4   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:33-40   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Mandras RS, Retief DH, Russell CM. The effect of thermal and occlusal stresses of the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater 1991;7:63-7   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Smith LA, O'Brien JA, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Microleakage of two dentinal bonding restorative systems. J Dent Res 1988;67:309-12
29 Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:316-23   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, Kondamani J. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent 2000;48:78-80   PUBMED   ScienceOn
31 McCourt JW, Eick JD. Penetration of fissure sealants into contraction gaps of bulk packed auto-cured composite resin. J Pedod 1988;12:167-75   PUBMED
32 Cho YG, Choi HY. Effect of Biscover on the microleakage of composite resin restorations. Korean J Conser Dent 2005;30:355-62   과학기술학회마을   DOI
33 Harper RH, Schnell RJ, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. In vivo measurements of thermal diffusion through restorations of various materials. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:180-5   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Torstenson B, Brannstrom M, Mattsson B. A new method for sealing composite resin contraction gaps in lined cavities. J Dent Res 1985;64:450-3   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
35 Ramos RP,Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RGP, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealant on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25:448-53   PUBMED   ScienceOn
36 Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal microleakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass-ionomer. Oper Dent 1992;17:7-12   PUBMED   ScienceOn
37 Hegdahl T, Gjerdet NR. Contraction stresses of composite resin filling materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35:191-5   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:68-72   PUBMED   ScienceOn