Browse > Article

FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF MAXILLARY TWO IMPLANTS-RETAINED OVERDENTURE ACCORDING TO POSITION OF IMPLANT FIXTURES  

Ha, Heon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.46, no.2, 2008 , pp. 193-200 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: There have been a few studies about unsplinted implant retainted maxillary overdenture. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different position of implant for 2 implants-retained maxillary overdenture. Materials and methods: Three-dimensional finite element models were used to reproduce an edentulous human maxilla with an implant-retained overdenture. Two implants in the canine tooth positions on both side and in the second premolar tooth positions on both side models were examined. Axial loads of 100 N were applied to the occlusal surface at the right first molar tooth positions. Maximum stress at the implant-bone interface and stress at the cortical bone surface just under the loading point were observed. Results and conclusion: Within the limits of this study, maximum stresses were concentrated around implant of canine position at loading side. The second premolar area was thought to be more favorable to distribution of stress on mucosa, alveolar bone and implants than canine area for maxillary overdenture.
Keywords
Maxillary unsplinted implant overdenture; Three-dimensional finite element analysis; Stress distribution;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Douglass CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:5-8   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Mojon P, Thomason JM, Walls AW. The impact of falling rates of edentulism. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:434-40   PUBMED
3 Rodriguez AM, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function. Ann Periodont 2000;5:101-8   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: a longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:253-62
5 Meriske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Management of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:108-25   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:350-6   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Naert I, De Clercg M, Theuniers G, Schepers E. Overdentures supported by osseointegrated fixtures for edentulous mandible: A 2.5-years report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:191-6   PUBMED
8 Tanino F, Hayakawa I, Hirano S, Minakuchi S. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Int J Prosthondont 2007;20:193-8
9 Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Brantly WA, A threedimensional finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant place in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthodont 1995;4:98-100
10 Kwak HH, Yoon HR, Hu KS, Kang MK, Park HD, Koh KS et al. Topography of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Korean J Phys Anthrop 2001;14:137-49   DOI
11 The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:601-2
12 Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter S, Weinstein RL. Analysis of Osseotite and machined surfaces using implants with two opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-29   PUBMED
13 O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Carol Srream, 2002, Quintessence Publishing. pp 326-31
14 Kydd WL, Daly CH, Wheeler JB 3rd. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J. 1971;21:430-41   PUBMED
15 Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: A three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:144-50   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Wada S, Wakabayashi N, Tanaka T, Ohyama T. Influence of abutment selection in maxillary Kennedy Class II RPD on elastic stress distribution in oral mucosa: an FEM study. J Prosthodont. 2006;15:89-94   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Kim HS, Shin SW. Three-dimensional analysis of the normal dentition and edentulous maxilla of Koreans. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:191-203
18 Cavallaro JS Jr, Tarnow DP. Unsplinted implants retaining maxillary overdentures with partial palatal coverage: report of 5 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:808-14
19 Carr AB, McGiveny GP, Brown DT:Support for the distal extension denture base, in McCracken's Removable Partial Prosthodontics (ed 11). St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 2005;287-99
20 Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgery-clinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone. 2005;37:776-80   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Pietrokovski J, Starinsky R, Arensburg B, Kaffe I. Morphologic Characteristics of bony edentulous jaws. J Prosthodont 2007;16:141-7   DOI   ScienceOn