Browse > Article

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TIN COATED FILM WITH VARIOUS COATING THICKNESS ON TITANIUM ALLOY  

Lee, Jae-Yun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Oh, Dong-Joon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Chung, Chae-Heon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.45, no.5, 2007 , pp. 675-686 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem: Titanium nitride(TiN) coatings are the most general and popular coating method and used to improve the properties of metallic surface for industrial purposes. When TiN coating applied to the abutment screw, frictional resistance would be reduced, as a results, the greater preload and prevention of the screw loosening could be expected. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate mechanical properties of TiN coated film of various coating thickness on the titanium alloy surface and to evaluate proper coating thickness. Material and method: 95 Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) discs of 15 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness were prepared for TiN coating and divided into 7 groups in this study. Acceding to coating deposition time (CDT) with TiN by using Arc ion plating, were divided into 7 groups : Group A (CDT 30min), Group B (CDT 60min), Group C (CDT 90min), Group D (CDT 120min), Group E (CDT 150min), Group F(CDT 180min) and Group G (no CDT) as a control group. TiN coating surface was observed with Atomic Force Microscope(AFM), field emission scanning electron microscopy(FE-SEM) and examined with scratch tester, wear tester. Result: 1. Coating thickness fir each coated group was increased in proportion to coating deposition time. 2. Surface of all coated groups except Group A was homogeneous and smooth. However, surface of none coated Group G had scratch. 3. Adhesion strength for each coated group was increased in proportion to coating deposition time. 4. Wear resistance for each coated group was increased in proportion to coating deposition time. 5. Surface roughness in Group A, B, C was increased in proportion to coating deposition time. But, surface roughness in Group D, E, F was showed decreased tendency in proportion to coating deposition time. Conclusion: According to coating deposition time, mechanical properties of TiN coated film were changed. It was considered that 120 minutes coating deposition time ($1.32{\mu}m$ in coating thickness) is necessary.
Keywords
Titanium nitride(TiN); Adhesion strength; Wear resistance; Surface roughness;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Millic M, Milosavljevic M, Bibic N, Nenadovic T. Mechanical properties of sputtered TiN coatings. Thin Solid Films 1985:126:319-323   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Winkler S, Ring K. Ring JD, Boberick KG. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect : An overview. J Oral Implantol 2003:29:242-245   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995:10:295-302
4 Jemt T. Failures and complication s in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Banemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991:6:270-276   PUBMED
5 Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent 1993:21:203-208   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH. Miller AW. Implant abutment screw retations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001:86:24-32   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Binon PP, Sutter F, Beaty K, Brunski J, Gulbransen H, Weiner R. The role of screw in implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants (supplement) 1994:9:48-63
8 Arias DF, Arango YC, Devia A. Characterization of bilayer coatings of TiN/ZrN grown using pulsed arc PAPVD. Appl. Sur. Sci 2005:252:1175-1181   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Sundgren JE. Structure and properties of TiN coatings. Thin Solid Films 1985:128:21-44   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Jorneus L, Jemt T, Carlsson L. Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:353-359
11 Oh DJ, Kim HJ, Chung CH. A study on mechanical properties of TiN, ZrN, WC coating in titanium alloy. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006:44:740-750   과학기술학회마을
12 Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998:79:74-78   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Motosh N. Development of design charts for bolts preloaded up to the plastic range. J Eng Ind 1976:98:849-851   DOI
14 Kim HJ, Choe HC, Kim SG, Chung CH. Effect of TiN coating of abutment screw on detorque force. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006 under review
15 Takadoum J, Bennani HH. Influence of substrate roughness and coating thickness on adhesion, friction and wear of TiN films. Surf. & Coat. Tech. 1997:96:272-282   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JYK. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003:90:121-132   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Choi JU. Jeong CM, Jeon YC, Lim JS, Jeong HC, Eom TG, Influence of Tungsten Carbide/Carbon coating on the preload of implant abutment screws. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2006:44:229-242   과학기술학회마을
18 Polonsky IA, Chang TP, Keer LM, Sproul WD. A study of rolling-contact fatigue of bearing steel coated with physical vapor deposition TiN films: Coating response to cyclic contact stress and physical mechanism underlying coating effect on the fatigue life. Wear 1998:215:191-204   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Binon PP. Implants and components : Entering the new millenium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000:15:76-94
20 Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995:10:529-536
21 Mezger PR, Creugers NH. Titanium nitride coatings in clinical dentistry. J Dent 1992:20:342-344   DOI   ScienceOn