Browse > Article

RETROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY OF CSM ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT  

Park, Eun-Young (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Youngnam University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.45, no.3, 2007 , pp. 321-328 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem. To work the economic limitation of dental implant usage, some types of domestic implant have been developing. But, there have been seldom reported about the clinical success rate of them as yet. Purpose. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the performance of CSM implants(CSM company, Daegu, Korea). Material and methods. Thirty-five patients were rehabilitated with 150 CSM implants in this multicenter study. Results. The success rate was 96.2%. CSM Titanium fixtures can obtain slightly higher success rate when a cover screw was not used for implant installation than when used. However it doesn't show significant difference(p=.7615, Fisher's Exact test). Conclusion. This multicenter retrospective study demonstrated the efficacy of the CSM implant in the treatment of variety of clinical manifestation of tooth loss. And it can be assumed that whether a cover screw is used or not should no influence on the osseointegration.
Keywords
CSM implants; Cover screws; Success rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients. Int J periadant. 1993:6(2):189-196
2 Lee JB. Wang YS. Shin KH. Hwang BN. Retrospective multicenter study of AVANA endosseous dental implant. J Kor Dent Ass 2000:38:558-566
3 Fugazzotto PA, Gulbransen HJ, Wheeler SL, Lindsay JA. The use of IMZ osseointegrated implant in partially edentulous patients: success and failure rates of 2023 implants cylinders up to 60+ months in function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993:8(6) 617-621
4 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. A longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study. Part III : Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990:64:185-194   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Nevins M, Langer B. The successful application of osseointegrated implants to the posterior jaws: a long term retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993:8(4):428-432
6 Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL. Consideration for successful single tooth implant restoration. J Esthet Dentistry 1993:5(3):118-123
7 Saadoun AP, Legall ML. Clinical results and guidelines on Steri-Oss endosseus implant. Int J periodont Rest Dent 1992:12:487-499
8 Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR, et al. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 con¬secutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J PeriadantaI 1988:59:287-296   DOI
9 American Academy of Periodontology. Proceedings of World Workshop in clinical Periodontics. Chicago, American Academy of Periodontics 1989
10 Nam KY, Chang BS, Urn HS. A Two-year Retrospective Study on the Clinical Success of the Korean implant Systems. J Korean Academy Periodontol 2003:33:37 -46   DOI
11 Lazzara R, SiddiquI AA, Binon Pud, Feldman S, Weiner R, Phillios RM, Gonshor. A Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseus dental implants placed over a five-year period. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996:7:73-83   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Adell R, Lekholm U, RockIer B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981: 10:387-416   DOI
13 Agerberg G, Carsson GE. Chevving ability in relation to dental and general health. Analyses of data obtained from a questionnaire. Acta Odotol Scand 1981;39:147-53   DOI
14 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ollson A Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10 year period. Scand J Plast Recanstr Surg 1977:11(suppl.16)1-132   DOI
15 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. A longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study. Part II : The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990:64:53-61   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long term effIcacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria ofsuccess.lnt J Oral Maxillafac Implants 1986:1(1):11-25
17 Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws:a 5 year followup report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993:8(3) :635-640
18 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillafac Implants 1993:6(2) 180-188
19 Adell R, Ericsson B, Lekholm U,Branemark PI, Jemt T. A long term follow-up study of osseo integrated implants in the reatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990:5:347-59   PUBMED
20 Branemark PI, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Olsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969:3:81-100   DOI
21 Jaffm R, Berman C. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone : A 5 year analysis. J Periodontal 1991:62:2-4   DOI
22 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. A longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study. Part I : Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1989:62:451-7