Browse > Article

THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF FIVE DIFFERENT TAPER DESIGN IMPLANT SYSTEMS  

Byun, Sang-Ki (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Park, Won-Hee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Lee, Young-Soo (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.44, no.5, 2006 , pp. 584-593 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem : Dental implant which has been developed gradually through many experiments and clinical applications is presently used to various dental prosthetic treatments. To conduct a successful function of implant prosthesis in oral cavity for a long time, it is important that not only structure materials must have the biocompatibility, but also the prosthesis must be designed for the stress, which is occurred in occlusion, to scatter adequately of load support. Therefore, it is essential to give the consideration about the stress analysis of supporting tissues for higher successful rates. Purpose : Recently, many implant manufacturing company produce various taper design of root form implant, the fixture is often selected. However, the stress analysis of taper form fixture still requires more studies. Material and method : This study we make the element models that five implant fixture; Branemark system(Nobel Biocare, Gothenberg, Sweden), Camlog system(Altatec, Germany), Astra system(Astra Tech, Sweden), 3i system(Implant Innovations Inc, USA), Avana system(Osstem, Korea) were placed in the area of mandibular first premolar and prosthesis fabricated, which we compared with stress distribution using the three-dimension finite element analysis under two loading condition. Results : This study compares the aspect of stress distribution of each system with the standard of Von mises stress, among many resulted from finite element analysis so that this research gets the following results. 1. In all implant system, oblique loading of maximum Von mises stress of implant, alveolar bone and crown is higher than vertical loading of those. 2. Regardless of loading conditions and type of system, cortical bone which contacts with implant fixture top area has high stress, and cancellous bone has a little stress. under the vertical loading, maximum Von mises stress is more higher in order of Branemark, Camlog, Astra, 3i, Avana. under the horizontal loading, maximum Von mises is more higher in order of Camlog, Branemark, Astra, 3i, Avana.
Keywords
Implant prosthesis; Fixture shape; Taper form implant; Three-dimension finite element stress analysis; Von mises stress;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Weinberg A, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining toothsupported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994:78:22-27
2 Holmes DC, Grigsby, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:450-458
3 Philips RW. Skinners science of dental materials, 8th ed: WB Saunders,1982:55
4 Park WH, Lee YS. Three dimensional finite element stress of implant prosthesis according to the different fixture locations and angulations. J Kor Acad Prosthdont 2005:43:61-77
5 Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part two: Axial loading. J Oral Implantol 1992:18:349-353
6 Bergman B. Evaluation of results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983:50:114-120   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983:62:25-29
8 Robert Aj, Charles LB. The excessive loss of branemark fixture in type IV bone:A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991:62:2-4   DOI
9 Block MS, Kent JN. Factors associated with soft and hard tissue compromise of endosseous implants. J Oral & Maxillofac Surg 1990:48:1153-1160   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lindquist LW, Rockier B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988:59:59-63   DOI   ScienceOn
11 David MD. The role of implants in the treatment of edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1990:3:42-49
12 Lee YS, Yoo KH. Three Finite Analysis of Mandibular Stress of Complete Denture Occlusion. J Kor Acad Prosthdont 1992:30
13 Adell R, Lekholm U, Branernark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated edentulous jaw. J Oral Surg 1981:10:387-410   DOI
14 Branernark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983:50:399-410   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Prosthet Dent 1989:4:211-217
16 Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clinical Oral Impl Res 1997:8:1-9   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981:52:155-170   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK: Comparison of stress trans-mission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:450-458
19 Frost HM. A determinant of bone architec-ture. the minimum effective strain. Clinical Orthopaedics 1983:175:286-292
20 Rangert B, Krogh PRJ, Langer B. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1995:10:326-334
21 Kenneth J. Phillips science of dental materials, 10th ed: WB Saunders, 1996:66
22 Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part one: Horizontal Loading. J Oral Implantol. 1992:18:343348
23 Meffert R. Implant therapy. In: Nevins M, Becker W and Kornman KS et al: Proceedings of the world workshop in clinical periodontics, Chicago, American Academy of Periodontology, 1989
24 Carl E. Misch: Contemporary implant dentistry 2nd ed. Mosby 1999
25 Patra AK, DePaolo JM, D'Souza KS, DeTolla D, Meenaghan MA. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent 1998:7:355-368
26 Brunski JB, Moccia AF Jr, Pollack SR, Korostoff E, Trachtenberg DI. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. J Dent Res 1979:58:1953-1969
27 Robert G. Restorative dental materials, 9th ed: Mosby, 1993:54
28 Haraldson T, Zarb GA. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Rec 1998:96:243-252