Browse > Article

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS OF ANODIC OXIDIZED TITANIUM ACCORDING TO THE PORE SIZE  

Ha Heon-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Lim Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim Myung-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.44, no.3, 2006 , pp. 343-355 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem. The success of osseointegration can be enhanced with an implant that has improved surface characteristics. Anodic oxidation is one of the surface modifying method to achieve osseointegration. Voltage of anodic oxidation can change surface characteristics and cell activity Purpose. This study was performed to evaluate MG63 cell responses such as affinity, proliferation and to compare surface characteristics of anodic oxidized titanium in various voltage. Material and method. The disks for cell culture were fabricated from grade 3 commercially pure titanium,1 m in thickness and 12 mm in diameter. Surfaces of 4 different roughness were prepared. Group 1 had a machined surface, used as control. Group 2 was anodized under 220 V, group 3 was anodized under 300 V and group 4 was anodized under 320 V. The microtopography of specimens was observed by scanning electron microscope (JSM-840A, JEOL, Japan) and atomic force microscope(Autoprobe CP, Park Scientific Instrument, USA). The surface roughness was measured by confocal laser scanning microscope(Pascal, LSM5, Zeiss, Germany). The crystal structure of the titanium surface was analyzed with x-ray diffractometer(D8 advanced, Broker, Germany). MG63 osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these specimens. The cell morpholgy was observed by field emission electron microscope(Hitachi S-4700, Japan). The cell metabolic and proliferative activity was evaluated by MTT assay Results and conclusion. With in limitations of this in vitro study, the following conclusions were drawn. 1. In anodizing titanium surface, we could see pores which did not show in control group. In higher anodizing voltage, pore size was increased. 2. In anodizing titanium surface, we could see anatase. In higher anodizing voltage, thicker oxide layer increased crystallinity(anatase, anatase and rutile mixed). 3. MG63 cells showed more irregular, polarized and polygonal shape and developed more lamellipodi in anodizing group as voltage increased. 4. The activity of cells in MTT assay increased significantly in group 3 and 4 in comparison with group 1 and 2. However, there was no difference between group 3 and 4 at P<0.05. Proliferation of MG63 cells increased significantly in pore size($3-5.5{\mu}m$) of group 3 and 4 in comparison with in pore size($0.2-1{\mu}m$ ) of group 2.
Keywords
Anodic oxidation; pore size; anatase; MG63 cell; MTT assay;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lampin M, Warocquire-Clerout R, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99-108   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Niki M, Ito G, Matsuda T, Orgino M. Comparative push-out data of bioactive and non-bioactive materials interface. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press, 1991:350-356
3 lshizawa H. Fujino M, Ogino M. Histomorphometric evauation of the thin hydroxyapatite layer formed through anodization followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;35:199-206   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. lnt J Oral Maxillofac implants 2003;18:341-348
5 Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, GeisGerstorfer J. Effect of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004;25:4087-4103   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim S, Kim K. Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on a titanium implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:333-338   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;150:263-270
8 Albektsson T, Brenemark PI, Hanson HA, Lindstorm J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Meachim G, Williams DF, Changes in nonosseous tissue adjacent to titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1973;7:555-572   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Groessner-Schreiber B, Tuan RS. Enhanced extracellular matrix production and mineralization by osteoblasts cultured on titanium surfaces in vitro. J Cell Sci 1992;101:209-217
11 Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575   DOI
12 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, Krozer A, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectic breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002;23:491-501   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DC, Michaels CM. Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:302-310
14 Badley RA, Woods A, Carruthers L, Rees DA. Cytoskeletal changes in fibroblast adhesion and detachment. J Cell Sci 1980;43:379-390
15 Boyan BD, Schwartz Z, Bonewald LF, Swain LD. Localization of 1,25-(OH)2D3-responsive alkaline phosphatase in osteoblast-like cells (ROS 17/2.8, MG 63, and MC 3T3) and growth cartilage cells in culture. J Biol Chem 1989 Jul 15;264:11879-11886
16 Glauser R, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, et al. Immediate occlusal loading of branemark MkIV TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: f-year results of a prospective, clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(suppll):47-56
17 Lim YJ, Oshida Y, Andres C, Barco MT. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:333-342
18 Schupbach P, Glauser R, Rocci A, Martignoni M, Sennerby L, Lundgren A, Gottlow J. The human bone-oxidized titanium implant interface: A light microscopic, scanning electron microscopic, and energy-dispersive X-ray study of clinically retrieved dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(suppl1):36-43   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Glauser R, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH, Scharer P. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: a prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001;3:204-213   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Clemow AJT, Weistein AM, Klawitter J, Koeneman J, Andresson J. Interface mechanics of porous titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1981;15:73-82   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Franceschi RT, James WM, Zerlauth G. 1 alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 specific regulation of growth, morphology, and fibronectin in a human osteosarcoma cell line. J Cell Physiol 1985;123:401-409   DOI
22 Chou L, Firth J, Uitto V, Brunette D. Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion and assembly in human fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 1995;108:1563-1573
23 Kokubo T, Kim HM, Kawashita M, Nakamura T. Bioactive metals:preparation and properties. J Mater Sci Mater med 2004;15:99-107   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Kim Y. Microarray-based expression analysis of human osteoblast-like cell response to anodized titanium surface. thesis, Seoul National University 2004
25 McAlarney ME, Oshiro MA, McAlarney CV. Effect of titanium oxide passive film crystal structure, thickness, and crystallinity on C3 adsorption. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:73-80
26 Larsson C, Emanuelsson L. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants - studies on the tissue response after 1 year to machined and e1ectropolished implants with different oxide thickness. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:721-729   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Larsson C. The Interface between bone and metals with different surface properties. Light microscopic and Ultra-structural studies. thesis, Goteborg:Goteborg university, 1997
28 Schwartz Z, Swain LD, Marshall TS, Sela J, Gross U Amir D, Muller-Mai C, Boyan BD. Modulation of matrix vesicle enzyme activity and phosphatidylserine content by ceramic implant materials during endosteal bone healing. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:429-437   DOI
29 Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Aspect of surface physics on titanium implants. Swed Dent J 1983;28(Suppl. ):19-36
30 Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004;25:1003-1010   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:442-447   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong YS, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:252-259   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J Jr, Dean DD, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells(MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Cho LR, Chang BS, Albrektsson T. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2005;20:349-359
35 Hall J, Lausmaa J. Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Appl Osseointegration Res 2001;1:5-8
36 Chappard L. Effect of roughness, fibronectin and vitronectin on attachment, spreading, and proliferation of human osteoblast-like cells(Saos-2) on titanium surface. Calcif Tissue lnt 1999;64:499-507   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Aalam AA, Nowzari H. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:793-798
38 Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;29:889-902
39 Park KH. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants. MSD thesis, Seoul National University 2003
40 Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Implant fixation improved by close fit. Acta Orthop Scand 1988;59(3):272-275   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Bryan MC Crystal structure of cholesterol monohydrate. Nature 1976;260:727-729   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Altebaeumer T, GeisGerstorfer J, Kern D. Cellular reactions of osteoblasts to micron- and submicron-scale porous structures of titanium surfaces. Cell Tissues Organs. 2004;178(1):13-22   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Sela J, Shani J, Kohavi D, Soskolne WA, Itzhak K, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Uptake and biodistribution of 99mtechnetium methylene- [32P] diphosphonate during endosteal healing around titanium, stainless steel and hydroxyapatite implants in rat tibial bone. Biomaterials 1995;16:1373-1380   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Branemark System with TiUnite and ma- chined surfaces in the posterior mandible: a randomized, open-ended trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5(suppll):57-63
45 Degasne I, Basle, Demais ME, Hure V, Lesourd G, Grolleau M, Mercier B, Hormia M, Kononen M. Immunolocalization of fibronectin and vitronectin receptors in human gingival fibroblasts spreading on titanium surfaces. J Periodontal Res 1994;29:146-152   DOI   ScienceOn