Browse > Article

CORRELATION ASSESSMENT BETWEEN RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS AND RADIOGRAPHIC METHOD ACCORDING TO PERI-IMPLANT BONE CHANGE  

Lee Mi-Ran (Department of Proshtodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Cho Lee-Ra (Department of Proshtodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Yi Yang-Jin (Department of Proshtodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Choi Hang-Moon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Park Chan-Jin (Department of Proshtodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.43, no.6, 2005 , pp. 736-744 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem. Initial stability of implant is an important factor for predicting osseointegration. It requires a rapid, non-invasive, user-friendly technique to frequently assess the implant stability and the degree of osseointegration. Purpose. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and the radiographic method for peri-implant bone change under in vitro conditions. Material and Method. Twenty implants of 3.75 mm in diameter(Neoplant, Neobiotech, Korea) were used. To simulate peri-implant bone change, 2 mm-deep $45^{\circ}$ range horizontal defect and 2 mm-deep $90^{\circ}$ range horizontal defect area were serially prepared perpendicular to the X-ray beam after conventional implant insertion. Customized film holding device was fabricated to standardize the projection geometry for serial radiographs of implants and direct digital image was obtained. ISQ values and gray values inside threads were measured before and after peri-implant bone defect preparation. Results. Within a limitation of this study, ISQ value of resonance frequency analysis was changed according to peri-implant bone change (p<0.05) and gray value of radiographic method was changed according to peri-implant bone change (p<0.05). There was no correlation between the ISQ value and the gray value for peri-implant bone change (p>0.05). But, in horizontal defect condition, relatively positive correlation were between ISQ and gray values(r=0.663). Conclusion. This results provided a possibility that peri-implant bone change may be evaluated by both RFA and radiographic method.
Keywords
Dental implant; Gray values; Radiography; Resonance frequency analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:261-7   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Sunden S, Crondahl K, Brondahl HG. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Branemark dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:220-6   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, B JP, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. A clinical resonance-frequency analysis study with sandblasted-and-etched ITI impalnts. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:529-39   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B, Krol JJ. A his to morphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:24-30   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:213-9   DOI   ScienceOn
6 O' Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of fie designs of dental implants. A human cadaver study. Clin Oral Den Rel Res 2000;2(2):85-92   DOI   ScienceOn
7 O' Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:474-80   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:437-43   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Bragger U, Burgin W, Lang NP, Buse D. Digital sub-traction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:160-6
10 Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501   PUBMED
11 Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Removal torque for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac ImpI 1988;3:21-4
12 Huang HM, Lee SY, Yeh CY, Lin CT. Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:65-74   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measruements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:226-33   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lee SY. Factors influencing the resonance frequency of dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1184-8   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kwon JY, Kim YS, Kim CW. Assessing changes of peri-implant bone using digital subtraction radiography. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001;39(3):273-82
16 Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:202-6   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Friberg B, Sennerby N, Meredith N, LekhoIrn U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;28:297-303   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Bergkvist G, Sahlholm S, Nilner K, Lindh C. Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up of treatment with non-submerged ITI implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:351-9   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Webber RL, Williams RC, Ruttimann UE. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodont Res 1987;22:396-402   DOI   PUBMED
20 Meijer HJA, Steen WHA, Bosman F. Standardized radiographs of alveolar crest around implants in the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:318-21   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Crondahl K, Lekholm U. The predictive value of radiographic diagnosis of implant instability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:59-64
22 Cho IH. The Periotest methods as a measure of jaw bone quality. J Korean Dent Assoc 1994;32:520-9
23 Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:437-43   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Nkenke E, Hahn M, Weinzierl K, Radespiel-Tro?ger M, Neukam FW, Engelke K. Implant stability and histomorphometry: a correlation study in human cadavers using stepped cylinder implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:601-9   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Ree A, Lundgre A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CHF. Resonance frequency analysis of implant subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs failing implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:428-34   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Lehmann TM, Grondahl HG, Benn DK. Computer-based registration for digital subtraction in dental radiology. review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:323-46   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Grondahl K, Grondahl HG, Webber RL. Influence of variations in projection geometry on the detectability of periodontal bone lesions. J Clin PeriodontoI 1984;11:411-20   DOI   PUBMED
28 Huh YJ, Jeon IS, Huh MS, Lee SS, Choi SC, Park TW, Kim JD. A comparative study on the accuracy of digital subtraction radiography according to the aquisition methods of reconstructed images. Korean J Oral Maxillofac RadioI 2002;32:107-11
29 Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson RA. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
30 Han WJ. A comparison of subtracted images from dental subtraction programs. Korean J Oral Maxillofac RadioI 2002;32:147-51
31 White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: Principles and interpretation. St. Louis, CV Mosby, 2000
32 Mol A. Dunn SM. The performance of projective standardization for digital subtraction radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:373-82   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Sennerby L, Wennerberg A, Pasop F. A new microtomographic technique for non-invasive evaluation of the bone structure around implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:91-4   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Black J. Push-out tests. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:1243-5   DOI   PUBMED
35 Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compendium 1998;19(5):493-502
36 Grondahl K, Sunden, Grondahl HG. Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Branemark fixtures. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:243-50   DOI   ScienceOn