COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF THE SPLINTED AND UNSPLINTED IMPRESSION METHODS FOR INTERNAL CONNECTION |
Choi, Jung-Han
(Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) Jang, Kyung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) Lim, Young-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) |
1 | Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 DOI PUBMED |
2 | Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:113-21 |
3 | Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:186-92 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Alhrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintenssence, 1985:11-12, 2537. |
5 | Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: A three-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:533-40 |
6 | Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-9 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Goldfogel M, Harvey W, Winter D. Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:284-6 DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Davis GB, Moser JB, Brinsden GI. The bonding properties of elastomer tray adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:278-85 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Fenton AH, Assif D, Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The accuracy of implant impression procedures. J Dent Res 1991;70(special issue): 399 (abstr no. 1065) |
10 | Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JI. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-7 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410 DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-7 DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75 DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RSA, Frasca LCF. Eng AC. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-8 |
15 | Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted technique: Effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-8 |
16 | Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:588-93 DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-61 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Tan KB, Rubenstein J, Nicholls J, Youdelis R. Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:346-63 PUBMED |
19 | Pagniano R, Scheid R, Clowson R, Dagefoerde R, Zardiackas L. Linear dimensional change of acrylic resins used in the fabrication of custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:279-83 DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Humphries RM, Yaman P. Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:331-6 |
21 | Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status. Implant Dent 2001;10:85-92 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
22 | Millington ND, Leung T. Inaccurate fit of implant superstructures. Part1: stresses generated on the superstructure relative to the size of fit discrepancy. Int J Prost hodont 1995;8:511-6 PUBMED |
23 | Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:468-75 |
24 | Assif D, Marshak B, Schmitt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:216-22 PUBMED |
25 | Carr AB. A comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-55 PUBMED |
26 | American Dental Association. Revised American Dental Association specification No:19 for non-aqueous, elastomeric dental impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:733-41 PUBMED |
27 | Nissan J, Gross M, Shifman A, Assif D. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequences, and different operators. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:20-3 DOI ScienceOn |
28 | Rudd KD, O'Leary TJ, Stumf AJ. Horizontal tooth mobility in carefully screened subjects. Periodontics 1964;2:65-8 |
29 | Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:684-8 DOI ScienceOn |
30 | Sekine H, Komiyama Y, Hotta H, Yoshida K. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixture-supporting systems. In: van Steenberghe H (ed). Tissue Integration in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction [Proceedings of an International Congress, May 1985, Brussels]. Amsterdam, The Netherland: Excerpta Media 1986:326-9. |
31 | Bartlett DW, Greenwood R, Howe L. The suitability of head-of-implant and conventional abutment impression techniques for implant-retained three unit bridges: An in vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2002;10:163-6 |
32 | Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:209-18 |
33 | Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61 DOI ScienceOn |