Browse > Article

THE CHANGE OF BONE FORMATION ACCORDING TO MAGNETIC INTENSITY OF MAGNET PLACID INTO TITANIUM IMPLANT SPECIMENS  

Hwang Yun-Tae (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
Lee Sung-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
Choi Dae-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
Choi Boo-Byung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.43, no.2, 2005 , pp. 232-247 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose. The purposes of this investigation were to discover the possibility of clinical application in the areas of dental implants and bone grafts by investigating the bone formation histologically around specimen which was depending on the intensity of magnetic field of neodymium magnet inside of the specimens. Material and method. 1. Measurement of magnetic intensity - placed the magnet inside of the specimen, and measured the intensity of magnetic field around the 1st thread and 3rd thread of specimen 20 times by using a Gaussmeter(Kanetec Co., Japan). 2. Surgical Procedure - Male rabbit was anesthetised by constant amount of Ketamine (0.25ml/kg) and Rompun (0.25ml/kg). After incising the flat part of tibia, and planted the specimens of titanium implant, control group was stitched without magnet, while experimental groups were placed a magnedisc 500(Aichi Steel Co., Japan) or magnedisc 800(Aichi Steel Co., Japan) into it, fixed by pattern resin and stitched. 3. Management after the surgery - In order to prevent it from the infection of bacteria and for antiinflammation, Gentamycin and Ketopro were injected during 1 week from operation day, and dressed with potadine. 4. Preparation of histomorphometric analysis - At 2, 4 and 8 weeks after the surgery, the animals were sacrificed by excessed Ketamine, and then, specimens were obtained including the operated part and some parts of tibia, and fixed it to 10% of PBS buffer solution. After embedding specimens in Technovit 1200 and B.P solution, made a H-E stain. Samples width was 75$\mu$m . In histological findings through the optical microscope and using Kappa image base program(Olympus Co. Japan), the bone contact ratio and bone area ratio of each parts of specimens were measured and analyzed. 5. Statistical analysis - Statistical analysis was accomplished with Mann Whitney U-test. Results and conclusion. 1. In histomorphometric findings, increased new bone formation was shown in both control & experimental groups through the experiment performed for 2, 4 & 8 weeks. After 4 weeks, more osteoblasts and osteoclasts with significant bone remodeling were shown in experimental groups. 2. In histomorphometric analysis, the bone contact ratios were 38.5% for experimental group 1, 29.5% for experimental group 2 and 11.9% for control group. Experimental groups were higher than control group(p<0.05) (Fig. 6, Table IV). The bone area ratios were 60.9% for experimental group 2, 46.4% for experimental group 1 and 36.0% for control group. There was no significantly statistical difference between experimental groups and control group(p<0.05) (Fig. 8, Table VII) 3. In comparision of the bone contact ratios at each measurement sites according to magnetic intensity, experimental group 2(5.6mT) was higher than control group at the 1st thread (p<0.05) and experimental group 1 (1.8mT) was higher than control group at the 3rd thread(p<0.05) (Fig. 7, Table V, VI). 4. In comparision of the bone area ratios at each measurement sites according to magnetic intensity, experimental group 2(5.6mT) was higher than control group and experimental group 1 (4.0mT) at the 1st thread(p<0.1) and experimental group 2(4.4mT) was higher than experimental group 1 (1.8mT) at the 3rd thread(p<0.1) (Fig. 9, Table IX, X). Experiment group 2 was largest, followed by experiment group l and control group at the 3rd thread of implant. There was a significant difference at the 1st thread of control group & experiment group 2, and at 1st thread & 3rd thread of experiment group 1 & 2, and not at control group experiment group 1.(p<0.1)
Keywords
Neodymium magnet; Titanium implant; Histomorphometric analysis; New bone formation; Bone remodeling;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 EI Charkawi HG, EI Wakad MT, Naser ME. Modification of osseointegrated implants for distal-extention prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:469-72   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Lewis SG, Beumer III J, Perri GR, Homburg WP. Single tooth implant supported restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:25-30   PUBMED
3 Branernark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg 1981, 16:1-132
4 Branernark PI, Zerb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. 1985
5 Salman NN. Park JB. Kenner GH, Vonrecum AF. Effect of electrical stimulation on bone growth into porous PMMA and Co-Cr-Mo alloy. Trans 11th Int Biomater Symp 1979;3:33
6 Park JB, Young SO, Keener GH. Alveolar bone ingrowth into porous dental im-plants by electrical stimulation. In: Electrical properties of bone and cartilage, CT Brighton, J Black, S Pollack, Eds., New York: Grune and Stratton. pp.225-247
7 Matsumoto H, Ochi M, Abiko Y, Hirose Y, Kaku T, Sakaguchi K. Pulsed electro-magnetic fields promote bone formation around dental implants inserted into the femur of rabbits. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:354-60   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Brighton CT, Black J, Friedenberg ZB, et al. A multicenter study of the treatment of non-union with constant current. J Bone Joint Surg 1981;63:2-13
9 Basset CAL, Mitchell SN, Norton L, Pilla AA. A nonoperative salvage of surgically resistant pseudarthoses and nonunions by pulsing electromagnetic fields: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1977;1245:128-43
10 Scher ELC. The use of osseointegrated implants in long span fixed partial prosthesis: A case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:351-3   PUBMED
11 Jacobs JD, Norton LA. Electrical stimulation of osteogenesis in pathological osseous defects. J Periodontol 1976;47:311-19   DOI   PUBMED
12 Kawata T, Hirota K, Sumitani K, et al. A new orthodontic force system of magnetic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:241-8   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Fukada E, Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. J Physical Soc Jap 1957;12:1158-62   DOI
14 Hayashikawa T. Effects of electrical stim-ulation on periodontal tissue regeneration in dogs. J Kyushu Dent Soc 1990;44:172-94
15 Woo KY, Kwon KR, Choi BB. The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Osteoblast Surrounding Dental Implant. The Journal of Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2003;19:196-206
16 Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Cleveland TW. Amoss DC. Electrical stimulation of bone growth into porous $Al_2O_3$. Biomed Mater Res 1976;10:231-47   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Basset CAL, Pawluk RJ, Pilla AA. Augmentation of bone repair by inductively coupled electromagnetic fields. Science 1974;184:575-7   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Yasuda I, Nagayama H, Kato T, et al. Fundamental problems in the treatment of fracture. J Kyoto Med Soc 1953;4:395-406
19 Cho YW, Choi BB, Lee SB. The effect of Magnetism(Neodymium) on Activity of Osteoblast. The Journal of Korean Acamedy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2003;19:186-93
20 Mark WO, Kenneth JM, Clinton TR. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthopedics & related Res 1998;355:90-104   DOI   PUBMED
21 Suzuki H. An experimental study of the micro electric current on the bone formation in Macaca irus. J Kyushu Dent Soc 1976;29:399-416
22 Jacobs JD, Norton LA. Electrical stimulation of osteogenesis in pathological osseous defects. J Periodontal 1976;47:311-9   DOI
23 Darendeliler MA, Darendeliler A, Mandurino M. Clinical application of magnets in orthodontics and biological implications: a review. European J Orthod 1997;19:431-42   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Yasuda I. Piezoelectricity of living bone. J Kyoto Pref Univ Med 1953;53:325
25 Kubota K. Effect of electrical currents of alveolar bone defects. J Kyushu Dent Soc 1982;36:64-81
26 Branomark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Karaki R. Experimental study of internal remodeling and callus formation in mandible by electrical stimulation. J Kyushu Dent Soc 1979;32:590-608
28 Yan QC, Tomita N, Ikada Y. Effects of static magnetic fields on bone formation of rat femurs. Med Eng Phys 1998;20:397-402   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Lee SM, Lee SB, Choi BB. Effect of the magnetism(neodymium magnet) on growth factor receptors of osteoblast. The Journal of Korean Acamedy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion 2003;19:88-96
30 Brighton CT, Magnusson PB. Electrically induced osteogenesis. Its clinical use in treating nonunion. In: Fukuda E, et al. et al. eds. Bioelectrical Repair and Growth. Niigata: Nisimura: 1985;3-19
31 Bassett CAL. Biophysical principles affecting bone structure. In: Bourne. ed. The Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press 1971;1-76
32 Zengo AN, Pawluk RJ, Bassett CAL. Stress-induced bioelectric potentials in the dentoalveolar complex. Am J Orthop 1973;64:17-27   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Bjesson G. Clinical Supported by Osseointegrated Implants: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-73
34 Altay OT, Kutkam T, Koseoglu O, Tanyeri S. The biological effects of implanted magnetic fields on the .bone tissue of dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:345-9   PUBMED