Browse > Article

TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF FOUR PORCELAIN REPAIR SYSTEMS  

Jeon Young-A (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Yang Byung-Duk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Lee Ho-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Park Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Song Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.43, no.2, 2005 , pp. 149-157 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem. Dental ceramics exhibit excellent esthetic property, compressive strength, chemical durability biocompatibility and translucency. However, it suffers from inherent brittle fractures. Various techniques and materials for intraoral porcelain repair has been suggested. Purpose. This study is to compare the tensile bond strength of four commonly used porcelain repair systems (Vivadent, Bisco, Ulttadent, Voco) and to insure the best system for the clinical application to the fractured porcelain. Materials and methods. A total of fifty specimens were fabricated. Specimens were stored in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 7 days and thermocycling was performed(1000 cycles), and subjected to a tensile force parallel to the repair resin and porcelain interface by use of an Universal Testing Machine. Result. 1. Voco showed the highest tensile bond strength. In decreasing order, the tensile bond strength of the other materials was as follows : Ultradent, Bisco, Vivadent. 2. There was a statistically significant difference between the porcelain repair systems(Voco, Ultradent > Bisco, Yivadent) (p<0.05). 3. SEM examination of prepared porcelain surfaces revealed that the surface treated with Voco showed brittle fracture. However, Ultradent, Bisco and Vivadent showed ductile fracture. 4. All specimens treated with four porcelain repair systems showed adhesive failure between porcelain and composite resin.
Keywords
Tensile bond strength; Porcelain repair system; Fracture;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jochen DG, Caputo AA. Composite resin repair of porcelain denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:673-9
2 Philips RW. Science of dental materials. 8th ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders, 1982;244-245
3 Plueddeman EP. Silane coupling agents. New York: Plenum Press, 1982:17
4 Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-1465   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Senda A, Suziki M, Jordan RE. The effect of fluorides and hydrofluoric acids on porcelain swfaces. J Dent Res 1989;68:236
6 Jones DW, Wilson HJ. Some properties of dental ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2:379-96   DOI
7 Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:127-131   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Haselton DR. Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:526-531   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Pratt RC, Burgess JO, Schwartz RS, Smith JH. Evaluation of bond strength of six porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:11-13   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Newberg R, Pameijer CH. Composite resin bonded to porcelain with a silane solution. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:288-91   PUBMED
11 Della Bona A, Van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-1596   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Tylka DF, Stewart GP. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain-composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:121
13 Dent RJ. Repair of porcelain-fused-to metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:661
14 Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for compositeto-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:119-124   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Suliman AB, Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-120   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Calamia JR, Etched porcelain veneers. The current state of the art. Quint Int. 1985;16:5-12
17 Cohen B, Weiner S. Restoration of fixed partial dentures with fractured porcelain veneers using an overcasting. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:390-2   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Pameijer CH, Louw NP. Repairing fractured porcelain: how surface preparation affects shear force resistance. JADA 1996;127:203-209
19 Culler SR et al. Investigations of silane priming solutions to repair fractured porcelain crowns. J Dent Res 1986;65:191
20 Semmelman JO, Kulp PR. Silane bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic. J Am Dent Assoc 1968;76:69-73   PUBMED
21 Lai JH, Johnson AE. Mesuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 1993;9:139-143   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Bailey JH. Porcelain-to-composite bond strengths using four organosilane materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:174-177   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
23 Diaz-Arnold AM et al. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:291-294   PUBMED
24 Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-rein-forced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;66:57-64   PUBMED
25 Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-291   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength & durability of porcelain bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163-168   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Bertolotti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair. lnt J Prosthodont 1989;2:483-9
28 Chadwick RG, Mason AG, Sharp W. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems- what are we really testing? J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:610-5   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Nelson E, Barghi H. Effect of APF etching time on resin bonded porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:271
30 Gregory WA, Moss SM. Effects of heterogenous layers of composite and time on composite repair of porcelain. Oper Dent 1990;15:18-22   PUBMED
31 Sindel J, Gehrlicher S, Petschelt A. Study of adhesion of composite to porcelainfused-to-metal ceramics. DZZ 1996;11:51
32 Nowlin TP, Barghi N, Norling BK. Evaluation of the bonding of three porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:516-518   DOI   ScienceOn