Browse > Article

A STUDY ON THE STABILITY OF 5 DIFFERENT SURFACE TREATMENT METHODS TO DENIAL IMPLANT USING RESONANCE FREQUENCY AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS  

Kim Sun-Jong (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Shin Sang-Wan (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Jung Sung-Min (Well Dental Clinic)
Ryu Jae-Jun (Major in Dentistry, Department of Medical Science, Graduate School, Korea University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.43, no.1, 2005 , pp. 78-94 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of various surface treatments by measuring resonance frequency and histomorphometric analyses. Material and methods. In 5 adult dogs, the mandibular premolar were extracted. Six months later, 30 screw titanium implants (Dentium Co., Seoul, Korea) 6mm in length and 3.4mm in diameter, were placed in the mandibles of 5 dogs. Implants were divided into five groups following to surface treatment methods ; Group 1 is machined controls, Group 2 is sandblasted with large grit and acid-etched (SLA), Group 3 is anodized (Autoelectric Co., Korea, 660Hz, Duty10), Group 4 is hydroxyapatite(HA) coated by ion beam assisted deposition(E-beam), Group 5 is hydroxyapatite(HA) coated with Sol-gel coating process. Resonance frequency was measured implant placement immediately, and 3, 6 weeks and 10 weeks of healing perods. With the animal subject's sacrifice 10 weeks after implantation, implants were removed on bloc and histologic and computer-based histomorphometric analyses were performed. Histomorphometric analysis involved quantification of the entire bone to metal contact around the implants. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS for Windows (ver. 9.0 SPSS Inc.) Statistical differences were considered significant at P<0.05. Results. The results were as follows : 1) In five groups, mean value of resonance frequency analysis(RFA) were highest in group 5 (Sol-gel implant) at implantation and those of group 4 (E-beam)was highest at 10 weeks . but there was no correlation between surface treatments and RFA. 2) In all surface treatment groups, the RFA values of implants decreased until 3 weeks and increased to 10 weeks. 3) The percentage of direct bone-to-implant contact (BIC) had statistical significance between five groups in cancellous bone, (P<0.05) the percentage of bone density inside the thread had no statistical significance between five groups. (P>0.05) 4) There was a significant difference between cortical bone and cancellous bone in BIC. (P<0.05) and bone density. (P<0.05) 5) There was a correlation between the RFA value of implants at 10 weeks and BIC in cancellous bone, and between the RFA value of implants at 10 weeks and bone density in cortical bone. (P<0.05). Conclusions. These results indicate that surface treatment does not affect the implant stability in case of good bone quality.
Keywords
Implant; Bone; Cortical bone; Cancellous bone; RFA;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Adell R, Lekholm U, RockIer B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Surg 1981;6:387
2 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B. Design and surface characteristics of 13 commercially available oral implant systems. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1993;8:622-633
3 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Lekholm U. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999a;28:297-303   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone 5-year analysis. J Periodont 1991;62:2-4   DOI
5 Guglielmotti MB, Renou S. A Histomorphometric Study of tissue Interface by laminar implant test in rats. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1999;14:565-570
6 Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. Direct bone anchorage of Oral Implants. Int J Prosthodontics 1993;3:30-41
7 Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorelli JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on Bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric syudy in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;28:889-902
8 Carlsson L, Rostlund T, Albrektsson T. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:21-24
9 Overgaard S, Soballe K, Josephsen K, Hansen ES, Bunger C. Role of different loading conditions on resorption of hydroxyapatite coating evaluated by histo-morphometric and stereological methods. J of Orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 1997;25:409
10 Cui FZ, Luo ZS, Feng QL. Highly adhesive. hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium alloy formed by ion beam assisted deposition. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:403-405   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Yoshinari M, Klinge B, Derand T. The bio-compatibility of hydroxy-apatite-coated implants created by ion beam dynamic mixing. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:96-100   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Pilliar RM, Deporter PA, Watson PA, The effect of partial coating with hydroxyapatite on bone remodeling in relation to porous-coated titanium-alloy dental implants in the dog. J Dent Res 1991;70:1338-1345   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Shulte W. The Periotest periodontal status.Zahnarztl Mitt 1986;76:1
14 Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: A 1-year follow up removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1987;2:69-75
15 Yoshinari M, Ozeki K, Sumii T. Properties of hydroxyapatite-coated Ti-6Al_4V alloy produced ion plating method. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1991;32:147-156   PUBMED
16 Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinstein. RL. A human histologic analysis of Osseotite${\circledR}$ and machined surfaces using implants with 2 opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1999;19:117-129   PUBMED
17 Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM. A histological assessment of the initial healing response adjacent to porous syrfaced Ti alloy dental implants in dogs. J dent Res 1986;65:1064-1070   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Ivanoff C-J, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of mono- and bicortical anchorage on the integration of titanium implants. A study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surgery 1996;25:229-235   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
19 Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721-764   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Rompen E, DaSilva D, Lundgren AK. Stability measurements of a double-threaded titanium implant design with turned or oxidized surface. Applied Osseointegration Research 2000;2:18-20
21 Patrick J, Albert E, Tan S, Brent P. Removal torque comparison of Tiunite${\circledR}$ and turned implants in the greyhound dog mandible. Applied Osseointegration Research 2000;1:15- 17
22 Johansson CB, Han CH, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. A quantitative comparison of machined commercially pure titanium and titaniurn-aliminum-vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1998;13:315-321
23 Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902   DOI   PUBMED
24 Plattelii A, Manzon L, Scarano A, Paolantonio M. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium Implants: An Experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1998;13:805-810
25 Lekholm M, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation Tissue integrated Prostheses. 1985;3:199-209
26 O' Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implant. A human cadever study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Back T. On cutting torque measurements during implants during implant placement. A 3-year clinical prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999b;1:75-83   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Shulte W. A new field of application of the Periotest method The occlusal-Periodontal load can now be measured quantitatively. Zahnarztl Mitt 1988;78:474
29 Johansson P, Strid KG. Assessment of bone quality from cutting resistance during implant surgery. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1994;9:279-288
30 Yoshinari M, Ohtsuka Y, Derand T. Thin hydroxyapatite coating produced by the ion beam dynamic mixing method. Biomaterials 1994;15:529-535   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Wennerberg A, Albrrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 2000;15:331-344
32 Gottlander M, Albrektsson T. Histomorp-hometric studies of hydroxylapatite-coated and uncoated CP titanium threaded implants in bone. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1991;6:399-404
33 Han C-H, Johansson C. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Quantitative and qualitative investigations of surface enlarged titanium and titanium alloy implants. Clin Oral and Implants Research 1998;1:1-10
34 Larsson C, Thompsen P, Aronsson B-O. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants. Studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thickness. Biomaterials 1996;17:605-616   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Meredith N, Rasmussen L, Sennerby L, Alleyne D. Mapping implant stability by resonance frequency analysis. Med Sci Research 1996;24:191
36 Branemark PI. Introduction to osseointegration. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence Publishing Co., 1985;11-76
37 Cameron H, Pilliar RM, MacNab I. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1973;7:301-11   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Meredith N, Book K, Friberg, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;12:226
39 Glauser R, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P. Initial implant stability using different implant designs and surgical techniques. Applied Osseointegration Research 2001;2:6-8
40 Derhami K, Wolfaardt J, Dent M, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the Periotest device in base line mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1995;10:221
41 Meredith N. On the clinical measurement of implant stability and osseointegration. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Surgical Sciences, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden. 1997
42 Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:221
43 Spiekermann H, Jansen VK, Richter EJ . A 10 year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1995;10:231-243
44 Tufekci E, Brantley WA, Mitchell JC. Crystallographic characteristics of plasmasprayed calcium phosphate coatings on Ti-6AI-4V. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1999;14:661-672
45 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U. Branemark PI. Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1990;5:347-359
46 Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early bone tissue responses to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1992;7:62-71
47 Vercaigne S, Wolke JGC, Vaert I. Bone Healing capacity of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated oral implants. Clin Oral Imp Research 1998;9:261-271   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Enbom L, Engevall S, Engquist B, Eriksson AR. Osseoint-egrated implants a swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobel-pharma implants. J Periodontol 1988;59:287-296   DOI   PUBMED
49 Jung YC. Effects of the ion beam assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on osscointegration of the endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. PhD thesis,2000, Yonsei University, Korea
50 Albreksson T. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170   DOI   PUBMED
51 Roberts E, Garetto L, Brezniak N. Bone physiology and metabolism. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis: Mosby-year Book. 1994;327-368
52 Simpson J, Snetivy D. The ITI${\circledR}$ Straumann SLA surface. 1998 Straumann 1-4
53 Plattelii A, Manzon L, Scarano A, Paolantonio M. Histologic and Histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium Implants: An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1998;13:805-810
54 Larsson C, Thomsoen P, Aronsson B-O. Bone response to surface modified titanium implants. Studies on the tissue response after one year to machined and electropolished implants with different thickness. J of Mat Sci Materials in medicine 1997;8:721-729   DOI   ScienceOn
55 Misch CE. Bone density:effect on treatment planning, surgical approach and progressive loading. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1990;6:23-31
56 Van Steenberge D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I. The applicability of osseintegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism. A prospective multicenter study of 558 fixtures. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Impl 1990;5:271-281
57 Park CJ. A study on the change of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. PhD thesis, 2003, Seoul National University, Korea