Browse > Article

THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT PROSTHESIS ACCORDING TO THE DIFFERENT FIXTURE LOCATIONS AND ANGULATIONS  

Park Won-Hee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Lee Young-Soo (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.43, no.1, 2005 , pp. 61-77 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem. The implant prosthesis has been utilized in various clinical cases thanks to its increase in scientific effective application. The relevant implant therapy should have the high success rate in osseointegration, and the implant prosthesis should last for a long period of time without failure. Resorption of the peri-implant alveolar bone is the most frequent and serious problem in implant prosthesis. Excessive concentration of stress from the occlusal force and biopressure around the implant has been known to be the main cause of the bone destruction. Therefore, to decide the location and angulation of the implant is one of the major considering factors for the stress around the implant fixture to be dispersed in the limit of bio-capacity of load support for the successful and long-lasting clinical result. Yet, the detailed mechanism of this phenomenon is not well understood. To some extent, this is related to the paucity of basic science research. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to perform the stress analysis of the implant prosthesis in the partially edentulous mandible according to the different nature locations and angulations using three dimensional finite element method. Material and methods, Three 3.75mm standard implants were placed in the area of first and second bicuspids, and first molar in the mandible Thereafter, implant prostheses were fabricated using UCLA abutments. Five experimental groups were designed as follows : 1) straight placement of three implants, 2) 5$^{\circ}$ buccal and lingual angulation of straightly aligned three implants, 3) 10$^{\circ}$ buccal and lingual angulation of straightly aligned three implants. 4) lingual offset placement of three implants, and 5) buccal offset placement of three implants. Average occlusal force with a variation of perpendicular and 30$^{\circ}$ angulation was applied on the buccal cusp of each implant prosthesis, followed by the measurement of alteration and amount of stress on each configurational implant part and peri-implant bio-structures. The results of this study are extracted from the comparison between the distribution of Von mises stress and the maximum Von mises stress using three dimensional finite element stress analysis for each experimental group. Conclusion. The conclusions were as follows : 1. Providing angulations of the fixture did not help in stress dispersion in the restoration of partially edentulous mandible. 2. It is beneficial to place the fixture in a straight vertical direction, since bio-pressure in the peri-implant bone increases when the fixture is implanted in an angle. 3. It is important to select an appropriate prosthodontic material that prevents fractures, since the bio-pressure is concentrated on the prosthodontic structures when the fixture is implanted in an angle. 4. Offset placement of the fixtures is effective in stress dispersion in the restoration of partially edentulous mandible.
Keywords
Three dimensional finite element stress analysis; Implant prosthesis; Alveolar bone; Yon mises stress; Offset placement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 David CH, William RG, Vijay KG. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intra mobile element - A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:450-458
2 Haldun I, Kivanc A. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30:41-46   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Abani KP, Jason MD, Karl S, et al. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent 1998;7:355-366   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Kim DW, Kim YS. A study on the osseointegrated prosthesis using three dimensional finite element method. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1991;29:167-213
5 Kivanc A, Haldun L. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implantsupported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism part II : 3-D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2001;10:238-244   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A three-dimensional, finite-element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Arch oral Biol 1993; 38:491-496   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:671-676   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraetion lesions: A finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:188-193   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Hanne F, Lars L, Dan L. Occlusal force pattern in dentitions with mandibular implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses occluded with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:55-62   PUBMED
10 Boggan RS, Strong MJ, Misch CE. Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82: 436-440   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Weinberg LA, Kruger B. An Evaluation of torque (moment) on implant/prosthesis with staggered buccal and lingual offset. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996;16:253-265
12 Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:51-55   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Robert G. Restorative dental materials, 9th ed: Mosby, 1993:54
14 Thomas B, Matty FA, Frank P. The experimental verification of the efficacy of finite element modeling to dental implant systems. J Oral Implantol 1996;22:104-110
15 Katona TR. Winkler MM. Stress analysis of bulk-filled C1V light-cured composite restoration. J Dent Res 1994;73:1470-1477   PUBMED
16 Ko HJ, Chung CH. Finite element analysis of stresses induced by osseointegrated prosthesis with or without connection between natural tooth and osseointegrated abutments. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1991;29:147-160
17 Cho HW, Kwon JH. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of single implant prosthesis using different fixture and abutment screw diameters. J Wonkwang Dent Res In 2001;10:1-24
18 Lee YS, Yoo KH. Three dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular stresses of complete denture occlusion. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1992;30:286-318
19 Robert AJ, Charles LB. The excessive loss of branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4   DOI   PUBMED
20 Atilla S. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:19-27   PUBMED
21 Atilla S, Sungur G. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:165-169   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the screw-vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:391-398   PUBMED
23 Lee JH, Kim CW, Kim YS. A comparison of load transfer in screw-and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture designs. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001;39:125-145
24 Thomas RM, Peter AP. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: A methodologic clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:20-27   PUBMED
25 Dan L, Lars L, Hanne F. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:197-203   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Philips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials, 8th ed: WB Saunders, 1982:55
27 Ferrario V, Sforza C. Biomechanical module of the human mandible - A hypothesis involving stabilizing activity of the superior belly of lateral pterygoid muscle. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:829-835   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM.: Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:360-370   PUBMED
29 Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983;62:25-29
30 David MD. The role of implants in the treatment of edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:42-49
31 Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:145-150   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Sato Y, Shindoi N, Hosokawa R, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:15-21   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Hertel RC, Kalk W.: Influence of the dimensions of implant superstructure on peri-implant bone loss. Int J Prosthodont. 1993;6:18-24   PUBMED
34 Kregzde M. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-demensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1993;8:662-673
35 Davis DM, Zarb GA, Chao YL. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses. Part 1. The effect of varying the number of supporting abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:197-201   PUBMED
36 George P, Phophi K, Stephen CB, David AF. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:633-640   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: a three-dimensional, finite-element study. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:757-763   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Hans VO, Joke D, Jos VS, The influence of bone mechanical properties and implant fixation upon bone loading around oral implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:407-418   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Lazzara RJ. Criteria for implant selection: Surgical and prosthetic considerations. The Implant Report 1994;6:55-62
40 Jaime LL, Matty FA, Frank AP. Comparative three-dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs. J Oral Implantol 1994;20:315-321   PUBMED
41 Cook SD, Weinstein AM, Klavitter JJ. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co-Cr-Mo alloy dental implant. J Dent Res 1994;61:25-29
42 Bergman B. Evaluation of results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:114-120   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
43 Kenneth J. Phillips' science of dental materials, 10th ed: WB Saunders, 1996:66
44 Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: A 1 year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36   PUBMED
45 Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:22-27   DOI   ScienceOn
46 Heo H, Kang DW. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the jaws at the simulated bilateral and unilateral clenchings. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999; 37:71-92
47 Andersson B, Boss A, Jorneus L. Mechanical testing of superstructures on the Ceraone abutment in the Branemark system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:665-672
48 Beat RM, Stephan H, Urs CB. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: An 8-Degree Taper Compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-526
49 Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:19-31
50 Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410   DOI   ScienceOn
51 Giulio M, Massimo L, Paolo P. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: Finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:369-376