Browse > Article

STRESS ANALYSIS OF SUPPORTING TISSUES AND IMPLANTS ACCORDING TO IMPLANT FIXTURE SHAPES AND IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTIONS  

Han Sang-Un (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Park Ha-Ok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Yang Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.42, no.2, 2004 , pp. 226-237 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Four finite element models were constructed in the mandible having a single implant fixture connected to the first premolar-shaped superstructure, in order to evaluate how the shape of the fixture and the implant-abutment connection would influence the stress level of the supporting tissues fixtures, and prosthethic components. Material and methods : The superstructures were constructed using UCLA type abutment, ADA type III gold alloy was used to fabricate a crown and then connected to the fixture with an abutment screw. The models BRA, END , FRI, ITI were constructed from the mandible implanted with Branemark, Endopore, Frialit-2, I.T.I. systems respectively. In each model, 150 N of vertical load was placed on the central pit of an occlusal plane and 150 N of $40^{\circ}$ oblique load was placed on the buccal cusp. The displacement and stress distribution in the supporting tissues and the other components were analysed using a 2-dimensional finite element analysis . The maximum stress in each reference area was compared. Results : 1. Under $40^{\circ}$ oblique loading, the maximum stress was larger in the implant, superstructure and supporting tissue, compared to the stress pattern under vertical loading. 2. In the implant, prosthesis and supporting tissue, the maximum stress was smaller with the internal connection type (FRI) and the morse taper type (ITI) when compared to that of the external connection type (BRA & END). 3. In the superstructure and implant/abutment interface, the maximum stress was smaller with the internal connection type (FRI) and the morse taper type (ITI) when compared to that of the external connection type (BRA & END). 4. In the implant fixture, the maximum stress was smaller with the internal connection type (FRI) and the morse taper type (ITI) when compared to that of the external connection type (BRA & END). 5 The stress was more evenly distributed in the bone/implant interface through the FRI of trapezoidal step design. Especially Under $40^{\circ}$ oblique loading, The maximum stress was smallest in the bone/implant interface. 6. In the implant and superstructure and supporting tissue, the maximum stress occured at the crown loading point through the ITI. Conclusion: The stress distribution of the supporting tissue was affected by shape of a fixture and implant-abutment connection. The magnitude of maximum stress was reduced with the internal connection type (FRI) and the morse taper type (ITI) in the implant, prosthesis and supporting tissue. Trapezoidal step design of FRI showed evenly distributed the stress at the bone/implant interface.
Keywords
Shape of the fixture; Implant-abutment connection; Bone/implant interface; 2-dimensional finite element analysis; Stress distribution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Papavasiliou G. Kamposiora P, Bayne SC. Felton DA. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent 1996: 76:633-40
2 Rieger MR. Mayberry M. Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six end osseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990:63:671-6
3 Kinni ME, Hokama SN, Caputo AA. Force transfer by osseointegration implant devices. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1987:2:11-4
4 Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaw : A 5year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1993:8:635-40
5 Matsushita M. Kitoh M. Mizuta K. Ikeda H. Suetsugu T. Two-dimensional FEA analysis of hydroxyapatite implants : Diameter effect on stress distribution. J Oral ImplantoI 1990:14:6-12
6 Dirtoft BI. Jansson JF. Abramson NH. Using holography for measurement of in vivo deformation in complete maxillary denture denture. J Prosthet Dent 1985:54:843-6
7 Hirayama M. Wang M. Bone morphology associated with biologic width among various dental implant designs. The Advanced J Clinical Implant Dentistry: Sensible. 2002:2: 17-20
8 Sutter F. Weber HP. Sorensen J. Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system : Design and engineering. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1993: 13 :409-31
9 Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996: 7: 143-52
10 Adell R. Lekholm U. Branemark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated edentulousjaw. J Oral Surg 1981:10:387
11 Craig GG. Peyton FA. Measurement of stresses in fixed bridge restortations using brittle coating technique. J Dent Res 1965 :44: 756-62
12 Buser D. Weber HP. Bragger U. The treatment of partially edentulous patients with ITI hollow-screw implants : Presurgical evaluation and surgical procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1990:5: 165-74
13 Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988: 3: 85-97
14 Jemt T, Linden B. Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants : From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1992:7:40-4
15 Carlsson GE. Haraldson T. Functional response in tissue-integrated prosthesis. 4th ed, Quintessence Publ. Co. 1986:74-8
16 Binon PP. Implants and Components: Entering the New Millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2000:15:76-94
17 Gibbs CH. Mahan PE. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981:46:443-9
18 Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication (I). J Dent Res 1956:35:664-70
19 Clelland NL. Ismail YH. Zail HS. Pipko D. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1991:6: 391-8
20 Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994:9:345-60
21 Major M Ash Jr. Wheeler's Dental anato-my. physiology and occlusion. : 7th ed W.B. Saunders Co. 1993:218-31.
22 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated implants : The Toronto study. Part III. Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990: 64: 185-90
23 Sones AD. Complication with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 62:581-5
24 Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Pros-that Dent 1983:50:399-410
25 Buser D. Weber HP. Bragger U. Balsinger C. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants : 3 year results of a longitudinal study with hollow-cylinder and hollow screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1991:6:405-12
26 Rieger MR. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990:63:457
27 Buser D. Weber HP. Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1year results of aprospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990:1:33-40
28 Siegele D. Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1989:4:333-40
29 Richter E. In vivo vertical forces on implant. J Oral Maxillofac ImplantoI 1995:10:99-108
30 Eckert SE, Wollan PC. Retrospective review of 1170 endosseous implants placed in partially edentulous jaw. J Prosthet Dent 1998:79:415-21
31 Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication (II). J Dent Res 1956:35:671-3
32 Yang HS. Thompson VP. A two dimensional stress analysis of fixed prosthesis with rigid or nonrigid connectors. J Dent Res 1991:70:192
33 Rieger MR. Adams WK, Kinzel GL, Brose MO. Alternative materials for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 61: 717-23
34 Choi JH, Seo KH, Choi JH, Han JS. Effects on bone engagement type and implant length on stress distribution : A three dimensional finite element analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999:37:687-97
35 Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 6th ed : C.V. Mosby Co. 1980:60-2