Browse > Article

THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRESS ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT SYSTEMS IN THE MANDIBULAR BONE WITH VARIOUS ABUTMENT TYPES AND LOADING CONDITIONS  

Shin Ha-Shik (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei Graduate School)
Chun Heoung-Jae (School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
Han Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Lee Soo-Hong (School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.41, no.5, 2003 , pp. 617-625 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem : There are many studies focused on the effect of shape of futures on stress distribution in the mandibular bone. However, there are no studies focused on the effect of the abutment types on stress distribution in mandibular bone. Purpose : The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of three different abutment types on the stress distributions in the mandibular bone due to various loads by performing finite element analysis. Material and method : Three different implant systems produced by Warantec (Seoul, Korea), were modeled to study the effect of abutment types on the stress distribution in the mandibular bone. The three implant systems are classified into oneplant (Oneplant, OP-TH-S11.5). internal implant (Inplant, IO-S11.5) and external implant (Hexplant, EH-S11.5). All abutments were made of titanium grade ELI. and all fixtures were made of titanium grade IV. The mandibular bone used in this study is constituted of compact and spongeous bone assumed to be homogeneous, isotropic and linearly elastic. A comparative study of stress distributions in the mandibular bone with three different types of abutment was conducted. Results : It was found that the types of abutments have significant influence on the stress distribution in the mandibular bone. It was due to difference in the load transfer mechanism and the size of contact area between abutment and fixture. Also the maximum effective stress in the mandibular bone was increased with the increase of inclination angle of load. Conclusion : It was concluded that the maximum effective stress in the bone by the internal implant was the lowest among the maximum effective stresses by other two types.
Keywords
Oneplant; Internal Implant; External Implant; Finite Element Analysis; Stress Distribution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 N.L. Clelland. Y.H. Ismail. H.S. Zaki, D. Pipko, 'Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis in and around the Screw-Vent Implant'. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Vol. 6, pp. 391-398. 1991
2 Eric P. Holmgren. Robert J. Seckinger. Leslie M. Kilgren. 'Evaluating Parameters of Osseointergated Dental Implant Using Finite Element Analysis a Two-dimensional Comparative Study Examining the Effects of Implant Diameter, Implant Shape. and Load Direction'. Journal of Oral Implantology, Vol. 24, 1998
3 Chun HJ. Cheong SY, Han JH. Heo SJ. Chung JP. Rhyu IC, Choi YC. Paik HK, Ku Y, Kim MH. Evaluation of Design Parameters of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Using Finite Element Analysis', Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. Vol. 29. pp. 565-574. 2002
4 Ziennkiewics OC. 'The finite element method in engineering science', ed 4. New York. Mc-GrawHill. 1989
5 D. Siegele, 'Numerical Investigations of the Influence of Implant Shape on Stress Distributon in the Jaw Bone', Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Vol. 4. pp. 333-340. 1989
6 David C. Holmes, William R. Grigsby, Vijay K. Geol, John C. Keller. 'Comparison of Stress Transmission in the IMZ Implant System with Polyoxymethylene or Titanium Intranmobile Element : A Finite Element Stress Analysis'. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Vol. 7. pp. 450-458. 1992
7 Laurent Pierrisnard, Guy Hure, Michel Barquins, Daniel Chappard. 'Two Dental Implants Designed for Immediate Loading: A Finite Element Analysis'. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. Vol. 17. pp. 353 - 362. 2002
8 Beat R. Merz, Stephan Hunenbart, 'Mechanics of the Implant-Abutment Connection : An 8-Degree Taper Compared to a Butt Joint Connection', Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, Vol. 15. pp. 519-526, 2000
9 M.R. Rieger, W.K. Adams, G.L. Kinzel. 'A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants'. J Prosth Dent. Vol. 63. pp. 457-465, 1990   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Tanne K. Burstone CJ, Sakuda M. 'Biomech- anical responses of tooth associated with diff-erent root lenghs and alveolar bone height: Changes of stress distributions in the PDL'. J Osaka Univ DentSchool 29: 17-24, 1989
11 Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, Heo SJ. Chung JP, Choi YC. Rhyu IC. Kim MH. 'Influence of Implant Shapes on Stress Distribution in the Jaw Bone by Finite Element Analysis'. J Biomed Eng Research, vol. 21, No.6, pp. 599-606, 2000
12 M.R. Rieger. W.K. Adams. G.L. Kinzel. and M.D Brose. 'Alternative materials for three endosseous implants'. J Prosth Dent. pp. 317, 1989