Browse > Article

THE LEVEL OF RESIDUAL MONOMER IN INJECTION MOLDED DENTURE BASE MATERIALS  

Lee Hyeok-Jae (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim Chang-Whe (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim Yung-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.41, no.3, 2003 , pp. 360-368 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of Problem: The residual monomer of denture base materials causes hypersensitivity on oral mucosa and intereferes with the mechanical properties of the cured resin. The amount of residual monomer is influenced by materials, curing cycle, processing method, and etc. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the residual methyl methacrylate(MMA) content of injection molded denture base polymer, and to compare this with the self-cured resin and the conventional compression molded heat-cured resin. Materials and Methods: Disc shaped test specimens (50mm in diameter and 3mm thick) were prepared in a conventional flasking technique with gypsum molding. One autopolymerized denture base resins (Vertex Sc. Dentimex. Netherlands) and two heat-cured denture base resins (Vertex RS. Dentimex. Netherlands, Ivocap. Ivoclar Vivadent, USA) were used. The three types of specimens were processed according to the manufacturer's instruction. After polymerization, all specimens were stored in the dark at room temperature for 7 days. There were 10 specimens in each of the test groups. 3-mm twist drills were used to obtain the resin samples and 650mg of the drilled sample were collected for each estimation. Gas chromatography (Agillent 6890 Plus Gas Chromatograph, Agillent Co, USA) was used to determine the residual MMA content of 10 test specimens of each three types of polymer. Results: The residual monomer content of injection molded denture base resins was $1.057{\pm}0.141%$. The residual monomer content of injection molded denture base resins was higher than that of compression molded heat cured resin ($0.867{\pm}0.169%$). However, there was no statistical significant difference between two groups (p>0.01). The level of residual monomer in self cured resin($3.675{\pm}0.791$) was higher than those of injection molded and compression molded heat cured resins (p<0.01). Conclusion: With respect to ISO specification pass / fail test (2.2% mass fraction) of residual monomer, injection molding technique($1.057{\pm}0.141%$) is a clinically useful and safe technique in terms of residual monomer.
Keywords
Residual monomer; Injection molding; Denture base; Gas chromatography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Flory PJ. Statistical Mechanics of chain molecules. Interscience publishers 1969
2 McCabe, JF, Basker RM: Tissue sensitivity to acylic resin. Brit dent J 1976;140:347-350   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ureporn K, Nongluk C, Sittichai K. Release of methyl methacrylate from heat-cured and autopolymerized resins: cytotoxicity testing related to residual monomer. Australian Dental Journal 1999;44:25-30   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Sadamori S, Ganefiyanti T, Hamada T, Arima T: Influence of thickness and location on the residual monomer content of denture base cured by three processing methods. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:19-22   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Craig RG Restorative dental materials. 9th edn. CV Mosby, St. Louis 1993; 514-530
6 Ruyter IE, Oysead H. Conversion in denture base polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:741-754   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Woelfel JB, Paffenbarger GC; Sweeney WT. Dimensional changes occuring in denture during processing. J Am Dent Assoc 1960;61:413-30   DOI
8 Mahler DB. Inarticulation of complete dentures processed by the compression molding technique. J Prosthet Dent 1951;1:551-9   DOI
9 Bartoloni J A, Murchison D F, Wofford D T, Sarkar N K: Degree of conversion in denture base materials for varied polymerization techniques. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2000;27:488-493   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Hrrison A, Huggett R: Effect of the curing cycle on residual monomer levels of acrylic resin denture base polymers. J Dent. 1992;20:370-374   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Sadamori S, Higeto N, Hamada T, Okuda K: A method of determining residual monomer in acrylic resin using methyl ethyl ketone. Australian Dental Journal. 1990;35:509-13   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Arnold TG. Dimensional stability of injection and conventional processing of denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:394-8   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Memon MS, Yunus N, Razak AA. Some mechanical properties of a highly cross-linked, microwave-polymerized, injection-molded denture base polymer. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 May-Jun;14:214-8
14 Sadamori S. Hamada T: The usage period of dentures and their residual monomer contents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:374-376   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Austin AT, Basker RM. The level of residual monomer in acrylic denture base materials. B. Dent J 1980;18:281-7
16 Jackson AD, Grisius RJ, Fenster RK, Lang BR.m Dimensional accuracy of two denture base processing methods. Int J Prosthodont. 1989 Sep-Oct; 2:421-8
17 Nogueira SS, Ogle RE, Davis EL. Comparison of accuracy between compression- and injection-molded complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Sep;82:291-300
18 Strohaver RA. Comparison of changes in vertical dimension between compression and injection molded complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Dec;62:716-8
19 Kalipcilar B, Karaagaclioglu L, Hasanreisoglu. U. Evaluation of the level of residual monomer in acrylic denture base materials having different polymerization properties. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 1991;18:399-401
20 Cotert HS, Cura C, Kesercioglu A. Modified flasking technique for processing a maxillary resection obturator with continuous pressure injection. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Oct;86:438-40
21 Dogan A, Bek B,Cevik NN, Usanmaz A. The effect of preparation conditions of acrylic denture base materials on the level of residual monomer, mechanical properties and water absorption. J Denr 1995;23:313-318   DOI
22 Austin AT, Basker RM. Residual monomer levels in denture bases. Br Dent J. 1982; 153:424-426   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Paul JS, Sreenivas K, Nels OE, Carol AL, Marshall, TL. Cytotoxicity of denture base resins. Int J prosthodont;10:73-77
24 Douglas WH, Bates JF. The determination of residual monomer in polymethylmethacrylate denture-base resins J. Mater. Sci. 1978;13:2699-260
25 Vallitu PK: Effect of polymerization temperature and time on the residual monomer content of denture base polymers. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:588-593   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Horie K, Otagawa M, Muraoka M, Mita I: Calorimetric investigation of polymerization reaction V. Crosslinkined copolymerization of methyl methacrylate with ethylene dimethacrylate. J Polym Sci 1975;13:445-486
27 Vallitu PK: The effect of surface treatment of denture acrylic resin on the residual monomer content and its release into water. Acta Odonto. Scand. 1996;54:188-192
28 Arab J. Newton JP, Lloyd CH. The effect of an elevated level of residual monomer on the whitening of a denture base and its physical properties. J Dent 1989; 17: 189-194   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Vallitu PK, Miettinen V, Alakuijala P: Residual monomer content and its release into water from denture base materials. Dent Mater. 1995;11:338-34   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Anthony DH, Peyton FA. Dimensional accuracy of various denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 1962;12:67-81   DOI
31 Wesley RC. Henderson D, Franzier QZ, et al. Processing changes in complete dentures: posterior tooth contacts and pin opening. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:46-53   DOI   ScienceOn