Browse > Article

SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF METAL SUBSTRATE ON THE COLOR OF CERAMIC  

Lee Su-Ok (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Woo Yi-Hyung (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Choi Dae-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Kwon Keung-Rok (Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Dentistry, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.41, no.2, 2003 , pp. 148-159 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem Metal-ceramic restorations have been used extensively by dental clinicians for nearly 40 years. Strength an functional ability of metal-ceramic restorations are proved to be satisfying, However esthetics and biocompatibility of metal alloy which is used in metal-ceramic restoration is not ideal. Using pure gold as an alternative, have advantage of esthetics, biocompatibility over conventional metal alloy. But there had been little article which studied on the color effect of pure gold on fual porcelain color. Purpose The purpose of this study was to spectrophotometrically evaluate the difference between color of metal alloy(Au-Pt, Ni-Cr) and pure gold, during color masking procedure with opaque porcelain and to analyze the differences, Material and Methods Three types of metal - base metal(Ni-Cr), high gold alloy(Au-Pt), pure gold(GES) - specimen were fabricated 1cm in diameter. Four steps were established - after finishing, after pre-coditioning, after application of first opaque porcelain(0.08mm in thickness), after application of second opaque porcelain(0.15mm in thickness)- and tested color with spectrophotometer every each steps and analyzed with $CIEL^*a^*b^*$ color order system. One-Way ANOVA test was used to and out if there were significant differences between groups tested and Shaffe multiple comparison was used to identify where the differences were. Results 1. After finishing and pre-conditioning, pure gold(GES) group showed most high values in $L^*,a^*,b^*$. 2. After application of first opaque porcelain(0.08mm in thickness), after application of second opaque porcelain(0.15mm in thickness), pure gold(GES) group showed the least difference in $L^*,a^*,b^*$ values and the lowest ${\Delta}E$ value(${\Delta}E$=0.63). 3. After application of first opaque porcelain and after application of second opaque porcelain differences that were significant (P<0.05) between groups were found only in $a^*$ values. 4. Base metal alloy group showed the lowest $a^*$ value in test after application of first opaque porcelain and the highest value in test after application of first opaque porcelain Conclusion Pure gold group and high gold group showed higher $a^*$ values than base metal group when tested after 0.08mm thickness of opaque porcelain was applied and pure gold group showed much similar $L^*,a^*,b^*$ values between 0.08mm thickness and 0.15mm thickness of opaque porcelain. This meant that pure gold was more easily masked by opaque porcelain than the other two groups.
Keywords
Electroforming; Galvanoforming; Spectrophotometer; Color; Porcelain;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Campbell, S.D. A comparative study of metal ceramic and all ceramic esthetic materials : Modulus of rupture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:476   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Karl F. Leinfelder. Porcelain esthetics for the 21st century. J American dental association 2000;131:47s-51s   DOI
3 Rogers O. W., and Armstrong B. W. Electroforming a Gold Matrix for Indirect Inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:959-966   DOI
4 Park HK and Chung CH. A study on the color of Korean natural teeth. J Korean Acad prosthodont 1988;26:185-195
5 Lloyd Miller. Organizing color in dentistry, J. American Dental Association 1987;Dec:26E-40E
6 Bangtson L.K. and Goodkind R.J. The conversion of chromascan designation to ClE tristimulus values. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:610-617
7 Jin TH, Cho HW and Jung lY. The influence of contamination on the porcelain color . WonKwang Dentistry 1991;2:161-170
8 Macentee M. and Lakowski R. Instrumental color measurement of vital and extracted human teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:203-208   DOI
9 Seghi R. R., Johnston W. M. and O'Brien W.J. Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56(1):35-40   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Seghi, R. R., Hewlett, E.R., and Kim, J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on transluscent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68(12):1760-1764
11 C.Gale Alderma and Helen scammon. A new approach to an old problem : metal ceramic shading. Dent Survey 1978;Jan:28-34
12 Crispin, B.J., Jo, Y.H., and Hobo. S. Esthetic ceramic restorative materials and techniques In Contemporary esthetic dentistry : practice fundamentals (Crispin,B.J. eds.). Quintessence Publishing Co,. Chicago 1994:155-188
13 Lecardonnel A. Sunrise Gold Foil Jacket Crown. Cashiers de Prosthese 1989;67:62-68
14 Peter. S. Lund., Steven. A. Aquilino., and Donna. L. Dixon. Evaluation of the color and appearance of a new textured opaque porcelain. Int J Prosthodontics 1991;4:548-554
15 Kim YH, Study on the color staility of veneer resin. J Korean Acad Conservative Dentistry 1991;16:1-5
16 Youn SS. Lee SH, Yang JH, Chung BY. A study on the color change of ceramic by PdAg alloy and mechanism. J Korean Acad prosthodont 1989;27:1
17 Vander Burgt. et al. Report of the committee on scientic investigation of the American academy of restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:84-122   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Seghi, R. R., Johnston W.M., and O'Brien, W.J. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989;68(12):1755-1759
19 S.H. Jacobs., C.J. Goodcre., B.K. Moore. and R.W. Dykema. Effect of porcelain thickness and type of metal-ceramic alloy on color. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:138-145   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Chae YA. A Study of Ni-rosistant bacteria isolated from gingival crevicular fluid on the patients wearing Ni-Cr alloy prosthesis (In terms od molecular biological aspects) : Article, Dept. of Dentistry, Kyung-Hee Univ. 1999
21 J.D Brewer., J.S.Glennon. and D.A.Garlapo. Spectrophotometic analysis of a nongreening, metal-fusing porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1991:65(5):634-641
22 O'Brien,W.J., Groh, C.L., and Boenke, K. M. A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shades. J Dent Res 1990:69(11):1762-1764
23 Goldstein, G.R., and Schmitt, G.W. Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 1993:69:616-619   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Crispin, B.J., Hewlett, E., and Seghi, R. Relative color stability of ceramic stains subjected to glazing temperatures. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:20-23   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Wozniak, W.T. Proposed guidelines for the acceptance program for dental shade guides. American dental association. Chicago. 1987:1-2
26 R. Duane Douglas and Malgorzata Przybylska. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999:82:143-149
27 Nasser Barghi and Rafael E. Lorenzana. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:429-431   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Seghi R. R. Effects of instrument-measuring geometry on colorimetric assessment of dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1990;69(5):1180-1183   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
29 Flemming Behrend. Gold Electroforming System : GES Restorations. J. Dent. Tech 1997;Mar:31-37