Browse > Article

A STUDY ON BlOCOMPATABILITY OF RESIN CEMENTS FOR ALL-CERAMIC CROWN  

Kim Kwang-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, Wonkwang University)
Kim Sung-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, Wonkwang University)
Jin Tai-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.41, no.2, 2003 , pp. 111-127 More about this Journal
Abstract
Statement of problem : Resin cements were used widely on all ceramic crowns, but the influence of resin cements on biocells was not understood clearly. Purpose : This study was investigated to evaluate the biocompatibility of resin cements for all-ceramic crowns. Material and Method : The resin cements used in this study were Panavia F (Kuraray Co., Ltd. Japan), Variolink II (Vivadent Ets., Schann / Liechtenstein), and Bistite II (Bistite dual cure resin cement-clear Tokuyama Soda Co. Japan). The viability of normal human oral keratocytes, gingival fibroblast, and gingival fibroblast immortalized by Human Papilloma virus 16 was measured in vitro for evaluation of cytotoxicity on resin cements, and the response of pulp tissue was analyzed and evaluated with light microscope after application of cements at cutting edge of incisors. Results : The normal human oral keratocytes was the most sensitive to toxicity of resin cement, and toxicity of cements was higher in Bistite II than in Variolink II. The cell viability of immortalized gingival fibroblast did not affected by type of cement and cultivation period, but there was a tendency that cytotoxicity in Bistite II was higher than in Variolink II. The cell viability of gingival fibroblast was similar to that of immortalized gingival fibroblast regardless of cement type, but Bistite II showed more toxic than others after 5 days cultivation. The responses of pulp tissue according to cement type were similar after 2 days cultivation, but revealed high toxicity in Bistite II after 10 days cultivation. Conclusion : Variolink II was more biocompatible than any other resin cements used in this study.
Keywords
Biocompatibility; Resin cement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Southan DE. Jorgensen KD. An explanation for the occurrence of internal faults in porcelain jacket crowns. Aust Dent J 1973:18:152-156
2 Lee DA. An experimental study on the effects of retained cements in the gingival sulcus around artificial crowns. J Korean Acad prosthodont 1976:14
3 Donovan T. Prince J. An analysis of margin configurations for metal-ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1985:53:153-157
4 Hanks CT, Fang D, Sun Z, Edwards CA, Bulter WT. Dentine-specific proteins in the MDPC-23 cell line. Eur J Oral Sci 1998: 106(suppl 1):S260-6
5 Acosta D, Wenzel DG. A permeability test for the study of mitochondrial injury in vitro cultured heart muscle and endothelioid cells. Histochem J 1975;7:45-48   DOI
6 Dentistry-preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry-test methods for dental materials. International Standards Organistation 1996:ISO 7405
7 Myers GE. Status report on zinc oxideeugenol and modifide cement. J AM Dent Assoc 1968:76:1053-1055
8 Horn HR. Histologic changes in teeth due to plastic filling materials. J AM Dent Assoc 1961:63:813-820
9 Gurley WB. Van Huysen G. Histologic changes in teeth due to plastic filling materials. J AM Dent Assoc & D Cos 1973:24:1806-1816
10 James V. Diefenbach G. Prevention of histopathologic changes in young dogs teeth by use of zinc oxide and eugenol. J AM Dent Assoc 1942:29:583-592
11 Max Kornfeld. Mouth rehabilitation 6th Ed. 1974 The C. V. Mosby Co.60
12 Ellison JA. Lugassy AA. Setcos JC. Moffa JP. Clinical trial of cast glass-ceramic crowns: Seven year findings(abstract). J Dent Res 1992:71:207
13 Rothermal RA, Kelly JR. Resin bonded pros-thesis, Microleakage and luting agent thickness of etched and cast mesh work retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1986:56:47-50
14 Begue-Kirn C, Smith AJ. Ruch JV, Wonzney JM, Purchio A, Hartmann D. Lesot H. Effect of dentine proteins. transforming growth factor b1(TGF-b1) and bone morphogenic protein2(BMP2) on the differentiation of odontoblasts in vitro. Int J Dev BioI 1992;36 491-503
15 Swerdlow H, Stanley HR. Reaction of the human dental pulp to capacity preparation : Results produced by eight different operative technics. J AM Dent Assoc 1959:58:49-59
16 Johnson HJ, Northup SJ, Seagraves PA. Gravin PJ, Wallin RF. Biocompatibility test procedures for materials evaluation in vitro I. Comparative test system sensitivity. J Biomed Mat Res 1983:17:571-586
17 Monsman T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immun Method 1983:65:55-63
18 Gerlier D. thomasset N. Use of MTT colorimetric assay to measure cell activation. J Immun Method 1986:94:57-63
19 Aldridge WN. The biochemical principles of toxicology. Exp Toxicol 1993:5:56-78
20 Stanley HR. Traumatic capacity of high speed and ultrasonic dental instrumentation. J AM Dent Assoc 1961:63:750-766
21 Leirskar J, Helgeland K. Cytotoxic effects of pH. fluoride and zinc. Int Endod J 1988;21:120-129   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
22 MacDougall M. Selden JK. Hydegger JR. Carnes DL. Immortalized mouse odontoblast cell line M06-G3 application for in vitro biocompatibility testing. Am J Dent 1998:11(suppl):S11-6
23 Berman MH. The complete-coverage restoration and the gingival sulcus. J Prosthet Dent 1973:29:301-309
24 Murray PE. Lumley PJ. Hamish F, Ross HF. Smith AJ. Tooth slice organ culture for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Biomaterials 2000:21:1711-1721
25 Gerlier A. Sollinger HW. Burlingham WJ. A raid assay for measuring both colony size and cytolytic activity of limiting dilution microcultures. J Immun Method 1988:107:111-7
26 Megloire H. Joffre A, Bleicher F. An in vitro model of human dental repair. J Dent Res 1996:75:1971-1978
27 Carbini RL, Fasch ACC, Itoliz ME. A quantitative microscopic study of the lead precipitation reaction for the histochemical demonstration of acid phosphatase. Histochem J 1975:7:419-451
28 Dubner R. Stanley H. Reaction of the human dental pulp to temporary filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med & Oral Path 1962:15:1009-1016
29 Wataha JC, Hanks CT, Sun Z. Effect of cell line on in vitro metal ion cytotoxicity. Dent Mater 1994;10:156-161   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Malament KA. Considerations in posterior glass-ceramic restoration. Int J Perio Dent 1988:4:33-49
31 Malament KA, Grossman DG. The cast glass-ceramic restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1987:57:674-683
32 Tyas MJ. The effect of silicate cement on the mitochondria and lysosomes of culture cells assessed by quantitative enzyme histochemistry. J Oral Rehab 1979:6:55-60
33 Ruyter IE. Release of formaldehyde from denture base polymers. Acta Odontol Scand 1980:38:17-27
34 Brannstrom M. Nyborg H. Pulp reaction to a temporary zinc oxide-eugenol cement. J Prosthet Dent 1976:35:185-191
35 Morris HF. Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies Project No. 147. Part II : A new assessment system for rating metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1986:56:546-551
36 Kaga M, Noda M, Ferracane JL, Nakamura W. Oguchi h, Sano H. The in vitro cytotoxicity of eluates from dentin bonding resins and their effect on tyrosine phosphorylation of L929 cells. Dental Materials 2001:17:333-339
37 Reed B, Wenzel DG. The lysosomal permeability test modified for toxicity testing with cultured heart endothelioid cells. Histochem J 1975:7:115-118
38 Schmalz G. The in vitro toxicity of silicone impression materials (Abs49). J Dent Res 1981;60:1210
39 Hamaguchi H. Cacciatore A. Tueller VM. Marginal distortion of the porcelain-bonded-to-metal distortion of the porcelain-bonded-to-metal complete crown : A SEM study. J Prosthet Dent 1982:47:146-153
40 Lee HY, Choi DG, Choi BB, Park NS. An experimental study on pulpal response to the phosphoric ester cement in dogs. J Korean Acad prosthodont 1986:24
41 Hensten-Petersen A. Comparison of the methods of available for assessing cytotoxicity. Int Endod J 1988:21:89-99
42 Wennberg A, Major A, Hensten-Pettersen A. Biological evaluation of dental restorative materials a comparison of different test methods. J Biomed Mat Res 1977;17:23-36
43 Sloan AJ, Shelton RM, Hann AC, Moxham BJ, Smith AJ. An in vitro approach for the study of dentinogenesis by organ culture of the dentine-pulp complex from rat incisor teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1998:43:421-430
44 Kueng W. silber E. Eppenberger U. Quantification of cells cultured on 96well plates. Anal Biochem 1989:182:16-9
45 Borenfreund E. Puerner JA. A simple quantitative procedure using monolaye cultures for cytotoxicity assays. J Tissue Culture Method 1983:9:7-9
46 Stanley HR. Swerdlow H. An approach to biologic variation in human pulpal studies. J Prosthet Den 1964:14:365-371
47 Berman MH. Preservation of pulp health during complete coverage procedures. J AM Dent Assoc 1965:70:83-89
48 Mitchell DF. The irritational qualities of dental materials. J AM Dent Assoc 1959:59:954-966
49 Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns - Literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982:48:396-400
50 Meryon SD. The importance of surface area in the cytotoxicity of zinc phosphate and silicate cements in vitro. J Biomat 1983:4:39-43
51 Doering J. Jensen ME. Sheth J. Tolliver D. Chan D. Etched porcelain resin bonded full veneer crowns. In vitro fracture resistance. Compend Cont Educ Dent 1989:10:336-446
52 Hensten-Pettersen A, Hegeland K. Sensitivity of different human cell lines in the biologic evaluation of dental resin based restorative materials. Scan J Dent Res 1981:89:102-107
53 Walton JN, Gardiner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures : Length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986:56:416-421
54 Seltzer S. Bender IB. Modification of operative procedures to avoid postoperative pulp inflammation. J AM Dent Assoc 1963:66:503-512
55 Wennber A. Cell culture in the biological evaluation of dental materials: a review. ATLA 1986;13:194-202
56 Biological evaluation of dental devices. International Standards Organisation 1992;ISO 1993
57 Cook JA, Mitchell JB. Viability measurements in mammalian cell systems. Anal Biochem 1989:179:1-7
58 Hunter AJ. Hunter AR. Gingival margins for crowns : A review and discussion. Part II : Discrepanices and configurations. J Prosthet Dent 1990:64:636-642
59 Zaimoglu A, Karaagaclioglu L. Microleakage in porcelain laminate veneers. J Dent 1991:19:369-372
60 Yoon DJ. Pulp reactions to tempoary cements. J Korean Acad prosthodont 1977:15
61 Bello JA. Bond strength and microleakage of porcelain repair materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985:54:788-91
62 Southan DE. Jorgensen KD. Faulty porcelain Jacket crowns. Aust Dent J 1972:17:436-440
63 Waerhaug J. Presence or absence of plaque on subgingival restorations. Scand J Dent Res 1975:83:193-201
64 Schmalz G. Agar overlay method. Int Endod J 1988:21:59-66
65 Van Huysen G. Gurley WB. Histologic changes in the teeth of dogs following preparation of cavities of various depths and their exposure to oral fluids. J AM Dent Assoc 1939:26:87-100
66 Zander HA. Pulp response to restorative material. J AM Dent Assoc 1959:59:911-915
67 Arenholt-Binslev D, Horsted-Bindslev P. A simple model for evaluating relative toxicity of root filling materials in cultures of human oral fibroblasts. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989:5:219-226
68 Leirskar J. Helgeland K. Toxicity of some dental cements in a cell culture system. Scand J Dent Res 1977:85:471-479