Browse > Article

EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENTS ON THE BOND STRENGTH OF DENTURE BASE RESINS TO DENTAL ALLOY  

Lee Joo-Hee (Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Catholic University)
Jung Eun-Min (Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Catholic University)
Jang Bok-Sook (Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Catholic University)
Chung Dong-June (Department of High Polymer Engineering, Seongkyunkwan University)
Heo Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Han Dong-Hoo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Shim June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics / v.40, no.4, 2002 , pp. 344-351 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare tensile bond strength between Cr-Co alloy and three denture base resins after surface treatment. Following the manufacturer's instructions, 180 bonded specimens were made from three denture base resins (Lucitone 199. Paladent 20. POSS resin) and three surface treatment methods (sandblasting. metal primer. silicoating) 20 samples were made in each group and a half was ther-mocycled 1000 times between $5^{\circ}C$ and $55^{\circ}C$. The tensile bond strength was measured using an Instron with 5mm/min crosshead speed. Data was analyzed with one-way ANOVA, T-test and Duncan test. The results were as follows : 1. Samples with metal primer coating had significantly high tensile bond strength than the other surface treated groups (p<.05). Significantly low tensile bond strength was shown in sand blasted groups (p<.05). 2. No significant difference was observed in metal primer coating groups before and after ther-mocycling (p>.05) 3. Tensile bond strength was decreased in silicoated samples after thermocycling (p<.05). 4. Of the surface treated groups with metal primer, Lucitone 199 had the greatest bond strength and POSS resin and Paladent 20 were followed (p<.05). 5. Of the surface treated groups with silicoating, POSS resin and Lucitone 199 had greater bond strength than Paladent 20 (p<.05).
Keywords
Metal primer; Silicoating; Thermocycling; POSS resin; Tensile bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bahannan SA, Connelly ME, Mueninghoff LA, Application of silica coating technique for removable prosthodontics. A clinical report J Prosthet Dent 1991;65: 1
2 Laufer BZ, Nicholls JI, Townsend JD, Siox-C coating. : A composite-to-metal bonding mechanism. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:320
3 Barzilay I, Mayers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN, Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131
4 EI-Sherif MH, EL-Messery AM, Halhoul MN, The effects of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:782
5 Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H et al, Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhesion-fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:456
6 Yamaguchi J, Omura I, Harada I, Adhesive and mechanical properties of a new dental adhesives. J Dent Res 1984;63:314
7 Chang MW, Shim JS, Han DH, et al, Bond strength of the reinforced hybrid denture base resin with Vinyloligosilsesquinoxane (POSS) to porcelain teeth. Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001 poster presentation
8 Kolodney H, Puckett Ad, Brown K, Shear strength of laboratory-processed composite resins bonded to a silane-coated nickel- chromium-beryllium alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1984;67:419
9 Matsumura H, tanaka T, Taira Y, et a1, Bonding of a cobalt-chromium alloy with acidic primers and tri-n-butylborane-initiated luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:194-199, 336-354
10 Twesme DA, Lacefield WR, Oneal SJ, Effects of thermocycling, silicoating, and etching on composite bonding to Cu, Au and Ni base alloys. J Dent Res 1987;66:206[Abstract]#799.
11 Yang HJ, Jang BS, Chung DJ, et al, The effects of denture cleansers and disinfectants on the color, surface hardness, surface roughness of denture base resins. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2001;39:105-113
12 Hansson O, Strength of bond with Comspan Opaque to three silicoated alloys and titanium, Scand J Dent 1990;98:248
13 Peutzfelt A, Asmussen E, Silicoating : Evaluation of a new method of bonding composite resin to metal. Scand J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:568
14 Eom TW, Chang IT, The effects of metal surface treatments on the bond strength of polymethyl methacrylate bonded removable prostheses. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:
15 Musil R, Tiller HJ, Die molekulare Kopplung der Kunststoff-verblednung an die legierungsoberfl che. Dentallager XXXII, Heft 1984;1155
16 Watanabe I, Matsumura H, Atsuta H, et al, Effect of two metal primers on adhesive bonding with thpe 4 gold alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:299-303
17 Chang JC, Powers JM, Hurt D, Bond strength of composite to alloy treated with bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993;4:8
18 Brady T, Doukoudakis AM, Rasmussen ST, Experimental comparison between perforated and etched-metal resin-bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1985;5:361
19 Kim SK, Chang IT, Heo SJ, Cytotoxicity of denture base resins, J Korean Acad Prosthodont
20 Yamashita A, Yamami T, Procedures for applying adhesive resin (MMA-TBB) to crown and bridge restorations. Part I : The influence of dental non-precious alloys and the treatment of inner surface of metal to adhesion. J Jpn Prosthet Dent 1982;26:584