Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.1.22

Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Science Education Research Trends using Augmented Reality - Focusing on Implications for Research in Elementary Science Education -  

Na, Jiyeon (Chuncheon National University of Education)
Yoon, Heojeong (Chuncheon National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.40, no.1, 2021 , pp. 22-35 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to investigate the trends in science education research using AR (Augmented Reality) and derive implications for elementary science education, we analyzed 71 research articles on AR application in science education published in both Korea and abroad from 2010 to August 2020. In quantitative aspects, the number of published articles has steadily increased. For domestic researches, the number of papers targeting for elementary school students was higher than that of middle & high school students. In the research method aspects, qualitative methods were most frequently used. In particular, papers regarding the development of AR program and verification of its effectiveness were most frequently published. The researches using mixed method in domestic field were smaller in number than that of the research in abroad. There were similar trends in research targeting elementary school students. In the aspects of the contents, more researches were performed on biology and earth science areas than others. In case of researches for elementary school students, the proportion of researches on biology and earth science was even higher. Domestically the proportion of studies on the convergence of science and non-science subjects was higher than that of foreign studies. The number of researches exploring the effectiveness on 'non-scientific attitude domain', 'cognitive domain', and 'program domain' were relatively higher than that on 'inquiry & practice domain' and 'science-related attitude domain'. For types of AR contents, 'observation manipulation type' was mostly studied, followed by 'experimental activity type', and 'learning guide type'. In case of studies on elementary school students, the ratio of 'observation manipulation type' contents was higher than that of others, whereas studies on 'field problem solving type' were relatively less reported than others. In addition, studies on 'simple interaction' were most frequently reported. Particularly, there were relatively few studies on 'linear and nonlinear interactions' in domestic field. As a result of analyzing key words, we found that the key words related to the characteristics and implementation of AR frequently occurred, and the key words related to elementary education and the merits of AR had many direct connections with other key words.
Keywords
augmented reality; research trend; elementary science education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Liu, P.-H. E. & Tsai, M.-K. (2013). Using augmented-reality-based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1-E4.   DOI
2 Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A. & Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 horizon report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
3 Ahn, H. S. & Choi, Y. M. (2014). Analysis of educational characteristics of augmented reality edutainment contents according to interaction type. The Korean Journal of Animation, 10(4), 152-169.
4 Altinpulluk, H. (2019). Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1089-1114.   DOI
5 An, K. & Seo, A. (2019). Exploring of priority the edu-tech content development in virtual and augmented reality: An application of AHP method. The e-Business Studies, 20(7), 233-260.   DOI
6 Akcayir, M. & Akcayir, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.   DOI
7 Arici, F., Yildirim, P., Caliklar, S. & Yilmaz, R. M. (2019). Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education, 142, 1-23.
8 Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.   DOI
9 Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R. & Graf, S. Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.
10 Bressler, D. M. & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517.   DOI
11 Carmigniani, J., Furht, B., Anisetti, M., Ceravolo, P., Damiani, E. & Ivkovie, M. (2011). Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 51(1), 341-377.   DOI
12 Chen, Y.-C., Chi, H.-L., Hung, W.-H. & Kang, S.-C. (2011). Use of tangible and augmented reality models in engineering graphics courses. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 137(4), 267-276.   DOI
13 Chang, R.-C., Chung, L.-Y. & Huang, Y.-M. (2016) Developing an interactive augmented reality system as a complement to plant education and comparing its effectiveness with video learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1245-1264.   DOI
14 Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. H. & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 78, 97-108.   DOI
15 Chung, B. J. & Kim, Y. T. (2020). Morphological awareness on derivational affixes in accordance with vocabulary knowledge in school-age children. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 29(3), 81-89.   DOI
16 Collela, V. (2000). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 471-500.   DOI
17 Estudante, A. & Dietrich, N. (2020). Using augmented reality to stimulate students and diffuse escape game activities to larger audiences. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), 1368-1374.   DOI
18 Jang, S.-H. & Kye, B.-K. (2007). Educational application of augmented reality contents. Journal of Korea Contents Association, 5(2), 79-85.
19 Goktas, Y., Kucuk, S., Aydemir, M., Telli, E., Arpacik, O. & Yildirim, G. (2012). Educational technology research trends in Turkey: A content analysis of the 2000-2009 decade. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 177-199.
20 Ibanez, M-B. & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computer & Education, 123, 109-123.   DOI
21 OECD (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. DeSeCo Project. OECD Publishing.
22 World Economic Forum (WEF) (2015). Deep shift: Technology tipping points and societal impact. Retrieved from November 12, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf
23 Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y. & Liang, J.-C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.   DOI
24 Martin-Gutierrez, J., Mora, C. E., Anore-Diaz, B. & Gonzalez-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 469-486.
25 Ministry of Education (MOE) (2020). The implementation plan of the distance education competency reinforcement project of teacher training university [교원양성대학 원격교육 역량강화사업 시행계획]. Retrieved from November 12, https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=0204&opType=N&boardSeq=81530
26 Nielsen, B. L., Brandt, H. & Swensen, H. (2016). Augmented reality in science education: Affordances for student learning. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 12(2), 157-174.   DOI
27 Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21) (2009). A framework for 21st century learning. Tucson: AZ: P21. Available at: www.21stcenturyskills.org
28 Pathomaree, N. & Charoenseang, S. (2005). Augmented reality for skill transfer in assembly task. IEEE International Workshop on Robots and Human Interactive Communication, 500-504.
29 Park, S. & Lee, J. (2020). Domestic research trends on augmented reality in education from 2015 to 2019. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(11), 1-23.
30 Park, S. B. (2017). Analysis of major theme in fourth industrial revolution-focusing on related industries. Second-half research report. Statistics Research Institute, Statistics Korea.
31 Park, H. & Sohn, E. (2020). Korean research trends on the educational effects of media ased on virtual reality and augmented reality technology. Journal of Learners-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(5), 725-741.   DOI
32 Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533-1543.   DOI
33 Ryu, J. H., Jo, I, H., Huh, H. O., Kim, J. H., Kye, B. K. & Ko, B. S. (2006). The next generation of learning model for augmented reality enhanced in tangible interface. CR 2006-18. Seoul: Korea Education and Research Information Service.
34 Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution, NY: Crown Publishing.
35 Shelton, B. E. (2003). How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships. Doctorial dissertation, University of Washington.
36 Sortiriou, S. & Bogner, F. X. (2008). Visualizing the invisible: Augmented reality as an innovative science education scheme. Advanced Science Letters, 1(1), 114-129.   DOI
37 Squire, K. & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371-413.   DOI
38 Telecommunications Technology Association (TTA) (2020). Information and communication dictionary. Retrieved November 12, from https://terms.tta.or.kr/dictionary/dictionaryView.do?word_seq=100949-17
39 Kim J.-S. (2018b). A study on the effects of science education STEAM program on augment reality for intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 20(3), 151-175.   DOI
40 Kim, H. (2018a). Augmented reality trends in educational research: Through a systematic review of Korean literature. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 22(3), 397-407.   DOI
41 Kyza, E. A. & Georgiou, Y. (2019). Scaffolding augmented reality inquiry learning: The design and investigation of the TraceReaders location-based, augmented reality platform. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 211-225.   DOI
42 Laine, T. H. (2018). Mobile educational augmented reality games: A systematic literature review and two case studies. Computers, 7(1), 19-47.   DOI
43 Lee, C. Y., Park, C. & Hong, H. G. (2019). An exploratory study on educational use and improvement of augmented reality in secondary school science. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(2), 265-292.
44 Lee, H., Kwon, Y., Kim, S., Son, S., Han, W. S., Hong, S. K., Park, B. Y. & Jeon, J. (2014). An analysis of the trends of domestic research related to integrated education in science. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 18(2), 295-319.   DOI
45 Lee, T. & Lee, D. W. (2015). The effects of augment reality based intervention and conceptual meaning mapping strategy on science learning abilities and interests of students with mental retardation. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 15(4), 421-441.
46 Lim, C. (2019). Redirecting the research and practice of educational technology for future society and education. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 253-287.   DOI