Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.3.375

Role of Scientific Reasoning in Elementary School Students' Construction of Food Pyramid Prediction Models  

Han, Moonhyun (Bucheon Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.38, no.3, 2019 , pp. 375-386 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study explores how elementary school students construct food pyramid prediction models using scientific reasoning. Thirty small groups of sixth-grade students in the Kyoungki province (n=138) participated in this study; each small group constructed a food pyramid prediction model based on scientific reasoning, utilizing prior knowledge on topics such as biotic and abiotic factors, food chains, food webs, and food pyramid concepts. To understand the scientific reasoning applied by the students during the modeling process, three forms of qualitative data were collected and analyzed: each small group's discourse, their representation, and the researcher's field notes. Based on this data, the researcher categorized the students' model patterns into three categories and identified how the students used scientific reasoning in their model patterns. The study found that the model patterns consisted of the population number variation model, the biological and abiotic factors change model, and the equilibrium model. In the population number variation model, students used phenomenon-based reasoning and relation-based reasoning to predict variations in the number of producers and consumers. In the biotic and abiotic factors change model, students used relation-based reasoning to predict the effects on producers and consumers as well as on decomposers and abiotic factors. In the equilibrium model, students predicted that "the food pyramid would reach equilibrium," using relation-based reasoning and model-based reasoning. This study demonstrates that elementary school students can systematically elaborate on complicated ecology concepts using scientific reasoning and modeling processes.
Keywords
ecology concept; food pyramid; food web; model; scientific reasoning;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Boersma, K., Waarlo, A. J. & Klaassen, K. (2011). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology education. Journal of Biology Education, 45(4), 190-197.   DOI
2 Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In Giere, R. (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
3 Draper, F. (1993). A proposed sequence for developing system thinking in a grade 4-12 curriculum. System Dynamic Review, 9, 207-214.   DOI
4 Forbes, C. T., Zangori, L. & Schwarz, C. V. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students’ modeldriven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895-921.   DOI
5 Green, D. W. (1997). Explaining and envisaging an ecological phenomenon. British Journal of Psychology, 88(2), 199-217.   DOI
6 Griffiths, A. K. & Grant, B. A. (1985). High school students’ understanding of food webs: Identification of a learning hierarchy and misconceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(5), 421-436.   DOI
7 Grotzer, T. A., & Basca, B. B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying causal structures of ecosystems impact students' understanding? Journal of Biology Education, 38(1), 16-29.   DOI
8 Han, M. H. & Kim, H. B. (2012). Elementary students’ reasoning patterns represented in constructing models of “Food web and food pyramid”. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(1), 71-83.   DOI
9 Han, M. H. & Kim, H. B. (2013). The role of teacher's question prompt in elementary students' "Food web" modeling. Biology Education, 41(2), 296-309.   DOI
10 Chen, Y. C., Benus, M. J. & Yarker, M. B. (2016). Using models to support argumentation in the science classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 78(7), 549-559.   DOI
11 Jordan, R. C., Brooks, W. R., Hmelo-Silver, C., Eberbach, C. & Sinha, S. (2014). Balancing broad ideas with context: An evaluation of student accuracy in describing ecosystem processes after a system-level intervention. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 57-62.   DOI
12 Han, M. H. & Kim, H. B. (2019). Elementary students’ modeling using analogy models to reveal the hidden mechanism of the human respiratory system. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(5), 923-942.   DOI
13 Hmelo-Silver, C. E. & Azevedo, R. A. (2006). Understanding complex systems: some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53-61.   DOI
14 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S. & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307-331.   DOI
15 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S. & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 6-35.   DOI
16 Hogan, K. (2000). Assessing students’ systems reasoning in ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 3(1), 163-168.
17 Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L. R. & Yeary, S. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students’ developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1299-1324.   DOI
18 Kim, A. S. & Yoo, B. S. (1996). A study on the conceptions about ecosystem of the elementary school children. Biology Education, 24(2), 127-138.
19 Lee, K., Han, M. & Kim, H. B. (2016). Development of high school students’ system thinking through the construction of external representations of an ecosystem. Biology Education, 44(3), 447-462.   DOI
20 Lee, M. S., Kim, H. N. & Yang, I. H. (2019). Elementary school students’ interaction and conceptual change in collaborative scientific argumentation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(2), 216-233.   DOI
21 Mercer, N., Wegerif, R. & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111.   DOI
22 NGSS Lead States (2013). The next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington: National Academies Press.
23 Park, J. Y., Min, J. S. & Kim, H. B. (2003). High school students’ patterns of ecological conceptions. Biology Education, 31(3), 203-213.
24 Passmore, C., Stewart, J. & Cartier, J. (2009). Model-based inquiry and school science: Creating connections. School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), 394-402.   DOI
25 Peel, A., Zangori, L., Friedrichsen, P., Hayes, E. & Sadler, T. (2019). Students’ model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resistance through socioscientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 510-532.   DOI
26 Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Acher, A., Kenyon, L. & Fortus, D. (2012). MoDeLS: Challenges in defining a learning progression for scientific modeling. In Alonzo, A. & Gotwals, A. (Eds.), Learning progressions in science (LeaPS) (pp. 101-137). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
27 Westra, R. H. V. (2008). Learning and teaching ecosystem behavior in secondary education. Doctoral dissertation, University of van Utrecht. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/27708726_Learning_and_teaching_ecosystem_behaviour_in_secondary_education_Systems_thinking_and_modelling_in_authentic_practices
28 Yeo, C. & Lee, H. (2016). Developing and assessing a learning progression for the ecosystem. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 29-43.   DOI
29 Windschitl, M., Thompson, J. & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new pardigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967.   DOI