1 |
Zohar, A. & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
DOI
|
2 |
http://learningdesigngroup.org Learning design group, lawrence hall of science, University of California, Berkeley.
|
3 |
Asterhan, C. S. C. & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626-639.
DOI
|
4 |
Berland, L. K. & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191-216.
DOI
|
5 |
Bell, P. & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
DOI
|
6 |
Berland, L. K. & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
DOI
|
7 |
Berland, L. K. & Lee, V. R. (2012). In Pursuit of Consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during smallgroup argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857-1882.
DOI
|
8 |
Berland, L. K. & Russ, R. S. (2018). conceptual change through argumentation: A process of dynamic refinement. In Amin, T. G. & Levrini, O. (eds.), Converging perspectives on conceptual change: Mapping an emerging paradigm in the learning science (pp. 180-189). New York: Routledge.
|
9 |
Chinn, C. & Clark, D. B. (2013). Learning through collaborative argumentation. In Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Chinn, C. A., Chan, C. K. K. & O'Donnell, A. M. (eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 314-332). New York: Routledge.
|
10 |
Chin, C. & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908.
DOI
|
11 |
Cho, B., Ko, Y., Kim, H., Pail, S., Park, J., Park, J. & Im, M. (2002). A study of kindergarten, elementary, and middle school students' conception types and trend of grade related to evaporation and conditions of evaporation activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(2), 286-298.
|
12 |
Choe, H. S., Kim, E. K., Lee, K., Chung, W. H. & Paik, S. (2001). Investigating elementary students' alternative conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 123-138.
|
13 |
Clark, D. B., D'Angelo, C. M. & Menekse, M. (2009). Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students' own explanations as seed comments versus an augmentedpreset approach to seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 321-333.
DOI
|
14 |
Dogan, O. K., Cakir, M. & Yager, R. E. (2017). Delineating the roles of scientific inquiry and argumentation in conceptual chang process. In Shelley, M., Pehlivan, M. (eds.), Education research highlights in mathematics, science and technology 2017 (pp. 113-121). ISRES.
|
15 |
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
16 |
Enderle, P. J., Bickel, R., Gleim, L., Granger, E., Grooms, J., Hester, M., Murphy, A., Sampson, V. & Southerland, S. A. (2015). Argument-driven inquiry in life science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
|
17 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In Erduran, S. & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-28). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
18 |
Evagorou, M. & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237.
DOI
|
19 |
Grooms, J., Sampson, V. & Enderle, P. (2018). How concept familiarity and experience with scientific argumentation are related to the way groups participate in an episode of argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(9), 1264-1286.
DOI
|
20 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodriguez, A. & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
21 |
Kang, N. & Lee, E. K. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A review of literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(6), 1119-1138.
DOI
|
22 |
Kang, S., Han, S. & Noh, T. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 93-101.
|
23 |
Kim, Y. & Kim, H. (2015). A path analysis of learner's variables affecting on sciencetific argument level of elementary school students. Cheongram Science Education Research, 21(2), 1-11.
|
24 |
Kwak, K. & Nam, J. (2009). Enhancing the quality of students' argumentation and characteristics of students' argumentation in different contexts. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(4), 400-413.
|
25 |
Nussbaum, E. M. & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384-395.
DOI
|
26 |
Lee, M. (2019). An analysis of interaction and scientific conceptual change of elementary school students in collaborative scientific argumentation. Master dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
|
27 |
Lee, K. H., Yun, S. & Kim, H. (2012). Understanding of middle school students' small group argumentation of plant and animal classification: Focusing on the effects of leader. Biology Education, 40(1), 71-86.
DOI
|
28 |
Lee, S. (2006). The patterns and the characteristics of students' interactive argumentation in the small-group discussions. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 50(1), 79-88.
DOI
|
29 |
Lee, S. & Chun, J. (2017). Analysis of argumentation on socio-scientific issue in middle school students' small group structure based on intimacy and leadership. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(24), 343-368.
|
30 |
Lee, S. & Kim, H. (2017). Exploring secondary students' dialogic argumentation regarding excretion via collaborative modeling. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(6), 1037-1049.
DOI
|
31 |
Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M. & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977-1999.
DOI
|
32 |
Paik, S., Kim, H., Che, W., Kwon, K. & Noh, T. (1999). Effects of concept change teaching model considering students' learning motivations. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 19(2), 305-314.
|
33 |
Venville, G. J. & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952-977.
DOI
|
34 |
Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.
DOI
|
35 |
Ryu, S. & Sandoval, W. A. (2015). The influence of group dynamics on collaborative scientific argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 335-351.
DOI
|
36 |
Sampson, V. & Clark, D. B. (2011). A comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 63-97.
DOI
|
37 |
Simon, S. & Maloney, J. (2007). Activities for promoting small-group discussion and argumentation. School Science Review, 88(324), 49-57.
|
38 |
Song, J. (2017). A review of conceptual change research (1984-2016): Current trends and implications for future research. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17(3), 1-27.
DOI
|
39 |
Vosniadou, S. (2008). Bridging culture with cognition: A commentary on culturing conceptions: From first principles. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 277-282.
DOI
|
40 |
Zhou, G. (2010). Conceptual Change in Science: A Process of Argumentation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 6(2), 101-110.
DOI
|