1 |
Ozcelik, A. T. & McDonald, S. P. (2013). Preservice science teachers’ uses of inscriptions in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(7), 1103-1132.
DOI
|
2 |
Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284.
DOI
|
3 |
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
DOI
|
4 |
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
|
5 |
Tippett, C. D. (2016) What recent research on diagrams suggests about learning with rather than learning from visual representations in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(5), 725-746.
DOI
|
6 |
Topsakal, U. U. & Oversby, J. (2013). What do scientist and non-scientist teachers notice about biology diagrams? Journal of Biological Education, 47(1), 21-28.
DOI
|
7 |
Yoon, H.-G., Jo, K. & Jho, H. (2017). Secondary teachers’ perception about and actual use of visual representations in the teaching of electromagnetism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 253-262.
DOI
|
8 |
Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V. & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 189-216.
DOI
|
9 |
Eilam, B. & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). The significance of visual representations in the teaching of science. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 3-28). Springer International Publishing.
|
10 |
Han, K. & Noh, S. (2003). An analysis on the utilization of teacher's guides for science in elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
|
11 |
Jo, K., Jho, H. & Yoon, H.-G. (2015) Analysis of visual representations related to electromagnetism in primary and secondary science textbooks. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 65(4), 343-357.
DOI
|
12 |
Kim, T.-S. & Kim, B.-K. (2002). The comparison of graphing abilities of pupils in grades 7 to 12 based on TOGS (The test of graphing in science). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 768-778.
|
13 |
Kozma, R. & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualizations in Science Education (pp. 121-146). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
|
14 |
Liu, Y., Won, M. & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Secondary biology teachers' use of different types of diagrams for different purposes. In Science teachers' use of visual representations (pp. 103-121). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer International Publishing.
|
15 |
Colin, P., Chauvet, F. & Viennot, L. (2002). Reading images in optics: Students’ difficulties and teachers’ views. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 313-332.
DOI
|
16 |
McKenzie, D. L. & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The construction and validation of the test of graphing in science (TOGS). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), 571-579.
DOI
|
17 |
Nitz, S., Ainsworth, S., Nerdel, C. & Prechtl, H. (2014). Do student perceptions of teaching predict the development of representational competence and biological knowledge? Learning & Instruction, 31, 13-22.
DOI
|
18 |
Bungum, B. (2008). Images of physics: An explorative study of the changing character of visual images in Norwegian physics textbooks. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4(2), 132-141.
|
19 |
Chittleborough, G. & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Correct interpretation of chemical diagrams requires transforming from one level of representation to another. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 463-482.
DOI
|
20 |
Coleman, M. & Smolkin L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ use of graphical representations in science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(7), 613-643.
DOI
|
21 |
Cook, M. (2011). Teachers’ use of visual representations in the science classroom. Science Education International, 22(3), 175-184.
|