1 |
Baek, J. Y., Lim, C. S. & Kim, J. Y. (2014). Analyses on elementary students' cognitive domain in free science inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary approach. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 579-587.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Byun, S. M. & Kim, H. J. (2011). Recognition of free inquiry activity and its effects on the science inquiry ability of middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 210-224.
|
3 |
Champagne, A. B., Klopfer, L. E. & Anderson, J. H. (1980). Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 48, 1074-1079.
DOI
|
4 |
Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Germann, P. J., Haskins, S. & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting science inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475-499.
DOI
|
6 |
Gunstone, R. F. & White, R. T. (1981). Understanding of gravity. Science Education, 65(3), 291-299.
DOI
|
7 |
Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Reconstructing theory from practical experience. In, B. E. Woolnough(ed.). Practical science: The role and reality of practical work in school science. Open University Press. pp. 67-77.
|
8 |
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory. In J. J Wellington(Ed.). Practical work in school science: Which way now? NY: Routledge. pp. 93-108.
|
9 |
Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
10 |
Hwang, S. W., Kim, H. K., Yoo, J. H. & Pak, S. J. (2001). Ninth graders' self-assessment of scientific process skills in open investigation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(3), 506-515.
|
11 |
Jang, S. (2006). Prospective elementary school teachers' perception of inquiry-oriented teaching practice, with an emphasis on students' scientific explanation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(1), 96-108.
|
12 |
Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690.
DOI
|
13 |
Kim, C. J., Chae, D. H. & Lim, C. S. (1999). Introduction to science education. Seoul: BooksHill.
|
14 |
Kim, J. Y., Lim, C. S. & Baek, J. Y. (2014). Analyses on elementary students' behavioral domain in free science inquiry activities applying a brain-based evolutionary approach. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), 579-587.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Kim, K., Kim, S., Kim, N., Park, S., Kim, J., Park, H. & Jung, S. (2008). Characteristics of achievement trend in Korea's middle and high school students from international achievement assessment (TIMSS/PISA)., Research Report RRE 2008-3-1.
|
16 |
Kim, M. K. (2009). The effect of practicing the authentic open inquiry on compositions of laboratory reports. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(8), 848-860.
|
17 |
Koo, S. K. & Park, I. W. (2010). Development of science writing teaching strategy and its application to elementary science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(4), 427-440.
|
18 |
Lim, C. S. & Oh, Y. H. (2004). Relationships between the emotional states perceived by elementary school children and their memory on science learning experiences. The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 32(2), 173-180.
|
19 |
Lim, C. S. (2009). Development of a model of brainbased evolutionary scientific teaching for the learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(8), 990-1010.
|
20 |
Lim, C. S. (2012). Development of an instructional model for brain-based evolutionary approach to creative problem solving in science. Biology Education (Korea), 40(4), 429-452.
DOI
|
21 |
Lim, C. S., Kim, J. Y. & Baek, J. Y. (2012). Analyses on elementary students' science attitude and topics of interest in free inquiry activities according to a brainbased evolutionary science teaching and learning model. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 541-557.
|
22 |
Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34-37.
|
23 |
Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2007). Science curriculum. Ministry of Education and Science Technology Announcement 2007-79 (Supplement 9).
|
24 |
Park, Y. S. (2006). Theoretical study on opportunity of scientific argumentation for implementing authentic scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 401-415.
|
25 |
Peters, E. (2005). Reforming cookbook labs. Science Scope, 29(3), 16-21.
|
26 |
Shim, K. C., Park, J. S., Park, S. W. & Shin, M. K. (2007). An analysis of science inquiries as presented in elementary science textbooks. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 24-31.
|
27 |
Shin, H. H. & Kim, H. N. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers' and students' views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
|
28 |
White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 761-774.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Yoon, H. G. & Pak, S. J. (2000). The change of middle school students' motivation for investigation through the extended science investigations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 137-154.
|
30 |
Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is, and what it means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|