Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.2.273

The Differences in Eye Movement of Pre-service Teachers and Elementary School Students in SBF Question about a Visual Material of the Change on the Lunar Phases  

Ko, Minseok (Shinnamsung Elementary School)
Yang, Ilho (Korea National University of Education)
Kim, Obeom (Korea National University of Education)
Lim, Sungman (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.33, no.2, 2014 , pp. 273-285 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose of this study is to analyze eye movements of pre-service teachers and elementary students about a visual material of the change on the lunar phases. Eye-Tracker was used for analysis for eye-fixation time and eye movement at the structure, behavior, function question on the visual material. The Results were as follows. First, the pre-service teacher checked the visual materials from a holistic perspective depending on the function questions and fixed eye-fixation on the moon of the behavior question concerned. On the contrary, elementary school student only checked function of the moon located in the upper part and eye-fixation focus was spread here and there regardless of the questions. Second, the pre-service teacher gazed at the sun, earth and moon in a consecutive order depending on the questions to identify their spatial relations and checked location of the moon related to the question. On the contrary, the elementary school student did not view relations between earth, sun and moon from a spatial perspective. These findings indicate that the pre-service teacher conjures up the mechanism of the change on the lunar phases and confirms it in visual materials by visualizing change on the lunar phase model from earth's point of view while the elementary school student fails to take advantage of visual materials to visualize it from earth's point of view.
Keywords
the change on the lunar phases; visual material; eye-movement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Abell, S., Martini, M. & George, M. (2001). That's what scientists have to do: Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science during a moon investigation. International Journal of Science Education, 23(11), 1095-1109.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Barnea, N. & Dori, Y. J. (2000). Computerized molecular modeling the new technology for enhancing model perception among chemistry educators and learners. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1(1), 109-120.   DOI
3 Uttal, D. H. & O'Doherty, K. (2008). Comprehending and learning from 'visualizations': A developmental perspective. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner & M. Nakhlel (Ed.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 53-72). New York: Springer.
4 Zeilik, M. & Bisard, W. (2000). Conceptual change in introductory-level astronomy courses. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(4), 229-232.
5 Subramaniam, K. & Padalkar, S. (2009). Visualisation and reasoning in explaining the phases of the moon. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 395-417.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Rivet, A. E. & Kastens, A. K. (2012). Developing a construct-based assessment to examine students' analogical reasoning around physical models in earth science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 713-744.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Moulton, S. T. & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009). Imagining predictions: Mental imagery as mental emulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364(1521), 1273-1280.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Orion, N., BenChaim, D. & Kali, Y. (1997). Relationship between earth-science education and spatial visualization. Journal of Geoscience Education, 45(1), 129-132.   DOI
9 Ramadas, J. (2009). Visual and spatial modes in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 301-318.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Robert, H. T., John, F. L. & Frederick, J. B. (2006). An exploration of the use of eye-gaze tracking to study problem-solving on standardized science assessment. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(2), 185-208.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Rommelse, N. N. J., Stigchel, S. V. & Sergeant, J. A. (2008). A review on eye movement studies in childhood and adolescent psychiatry. Brain and Cognition, 68(3), 391-414.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Salvucci, D. D. & Goldberg, J. H. (2000). Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, 71-78.
13 Shin, W. S. & Shin, D. H. (2013). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.   과학기술학회마을
14 Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N. & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eye-tracking students' attention to powerpoint photographs in science education. Journal Science Education and Technology, 14(6), 509-520.   DOI
15 Kastens, K. A. & Rivet, A. (2008). Multiple modes of inquiry in earth science. Science Teacher, 75(1), 26-31.
16 Katz, R., Ragnarsson, R. & Bodenschatz, E. (2005). Tectonic microplates in a wax model of sea-floor spreading. New Journal of Physics, 7, (37), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/037   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Marathe, S. & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(3), 307-331.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Hmelo-Silver, C., Holton, D. & Kolodner, J. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 71-115.   DOI
20 Kosslyn, M. S. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of imagery debate. MIT Press.
21 Lightman, A. & Sadler, P. M. (1993). Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. The Physics Teacher, 31(3), 162.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Liu, L. & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 1023-1040.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Mason, L., Caterina, M. T. & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Journal of Computers & Education, 60, 95-109.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In Visualization in science education (pp. 9-27). Springer Netherlands.
25 Glenberg, A. M. (2009). Prediction and emotion in dialog. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1169-1172.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Byeon, J. H., Lee, I. S. & Kwon, Y. J. (2011). A study on consulting of teaching behavior patterns of gaze fixation by using eye tracker: The case study. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 11(4), 173-199.
27 Choi, H. D. & Shin, D. H. (2012). Eye-tracking on inservice elementary teachers' interpreting of science textbook tables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 358-371.   과학기술학회마을
28 Gabbard, C. (2012). The role of mental simulation in embodied cognition. Early Child Development and Care, 183(5), 643-650.
29 Glenstrup, A. J. & Engell-Nielsen, T. (1995). Eye controlled media: Present and future state. B. S. Dissertation, Copenhagen University.
30 Goel, A. K., Gomez de Silva Garza, A., Grue, N., Murdock, J. W., Recker, M. & Govinderaj, T. (1996). "Towards designing learning environments-I: Exploring how devices work," In Proc. Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Lecture notes in computer science 1086, Springer.
31 Hegarty, M. (2004). Diagrams in the mind and in the world: Relations between internal and external visualizations. In A. Blackwell et al. (Eds.) Diagrams 2004 Conference Proceedings. LNAI 2980 (pp. 1-13). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
32 Hegarty, M., Kriz, S. & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition & Instruction, 21(4), 325-360.
33 Hmelo-Silver, C. & Pfeffer, M. (2004) Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex systems from the perspectives of structures, behaviors and functions. Cognitive Science, 28(1), 127-138.   DOI
34 Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B. & Mintz, F. (2005). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial transformations of scientific visualizations. Foundations of Science, 10(1), 89-106.   DOI
35 McConkie, G. W., Underwood, N. R., Zola, D. & Wolverton, G. S. (1985) Some temporal characteristics of processing during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(2), 168-186.   DOI   ScienceOn