Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.1.181

The Comparison of Eye Movement in Measuring Tasks between the Underachievers and the Overachievers  

Choi, Hyun-Dong (Seoul Kaemyong Elementary School)
Shin, Won Sub (Seoul National University of Education)
Shin, Dong-Hoon (Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.33, no.1, 2014 , pp. 181-194 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference between eye movements according to science achievement of elementary school students on measuring tasks. Science achievement was graded by the results of Korea national achievement test conducted in 2012. As an assessment tool to check measuring task, two measuring measure problems from TSPS(Test of Science Process Skill; developed in 1994) which were suitable for eye tracking system were adopted. The subjects of this study were 3 underachievers and 3 overachievers from 6th grade who agreed to participate in the research. SMI was used to collect EMD (eye movement data). Experiment 3.2 and BeGaze 3.2 programs were used to plan experiment and analyze EMD. As a result, eye movements of participants in measuring task did not show the path to the common gaze by groups. To solve the problem of using specific measuring strategies related to the correct answer. Underachiever who failed in measuring tasks don't have enough measurement capabilities and lack eye movement through the area of interest for cognitive thinking. These results show that elementary school science curriculum dealing with measuring have to reflect a lot of step-by-step learning requires.
Keywords
measuring; length measuring; area measuring; eye movement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 7  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Choi, H. D. & Shin, D. H. (2012). Eye-tracking on in-service elementary teachers' interpreting of science textbook tables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 358-371.   과학기술학회마을
2 Choi, H. D., Shin, W. & Shin, D. H. (2012). Differences in eye movement pattern during the classification between the gifted and general students in elementary schools. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 501-512.   과학기술학회마을
3 Coelho, S. & Sere, M-G. (1998). Pupil's reasoning and practice during hands-on activities in the measurement phase. Research in Science & Technological Education, 16(1), 79-96.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hackling, M. W. & Garnett, P. J. (1995). The development of expertise in science investigation skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(4), 80-86.
5 Holmes & Neal, J. (1991). Teach measurement in elementary school science. Washington, DC: NSTA.
6 Hong, M. (2002). An analysis of Korean middle school students' achievement of scientific inquiry and the nature of science in TIMSS-R. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(2), 336-344.   과학기술학회마을
7 Jones, N. A. & Fox, N. A. (1992). Electroencephalogram asymmetry during emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity. Brain Cognition, 20(2), 280-299.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Jung, G. & Kim, B. (1997). Performance assessment of elementary school children's measuring skills. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(2), 127-137.   과학기술학회마을
9 Kim, H. (2005). Assessment of measuring ability and analysis of confidence about measuring result in elementary school high graders. Korea National University of Education Master degree thesis.
10 Kim, K., Choi, K. & Park, G. (2011). Effective research of game user interface through eye movement. Journal of the Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 12(5), 57-63.
11 Kim, S. (2000). The effect of observation․classification․ measurement training elementary school students' science process skills and attitude. Korea National University of Education Master degree thesis.
12 Lee, S., Lee, H. & Shin, M. (2011). Exploring the virtual advertising effects using eye tracking. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 22(5), 99-125.
13 Kim, Y. J. & Lee, J. (2011). An analysis of brain functional differences between the gifted and non-gifted. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(1), 111-130.
14 Kwon, J. & Kim, B.(1994). The development of an instrument for the measurement of science process skills of the Korean elementary and middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(3), 251-264.   과학기술학회마을
15 Lee, M. (2009). Selective attention concentration artificial vision system [선택적 주의집중 인공시각 시스템]. Magazine of the IEEK, 36(11), 52-65.
16 Liu, C. J. & Shen, M. H. (2011). The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 621-629.   DOI
17 Lubben, F. & Millar, R. (1996). Children's ideas about the reliability of experimental data. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 791-806.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Elementary guidebook for teacher Science Textbook 6-1, Seoul: Kumsung publishing company.
19 Muller, H. J. & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14(4/5/6/7/8), 389-410.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 PSSC (1996). Physical science study committee physics, USA[PSSC 물리, 탐구당]. pp. 189-198.
21 Shin, D. H. & Choi, H. (2012) Differences in eye movement between elementary school teachers and students during understanding textbook illustrations. Biology Education, 41(2), 198-210.
22 Yang, I. H. & Kim, H. (2004). Analysis of elementary students' confidence about measuring results. Science Education Research Institute Korea National University of Education [과학교육논문집], 14(1), 149-169.
23 Shin, W. & Shin, D. H. (2012). Eye movement analysis on elementary teachers' understanding process of science textbook graphs. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 386-397.   과학기술학회마을
24 Shin, W. & Shin, D. H. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.   과학기술학회마을
25 Shin, W. & Shin, D. H. (2013b). Development of the heuristic attention model based on analysis of eye movement of elementary school students on discrimination task. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Yang, I., Song, J., Lim, S. & Lim, J. (2008). An analysis on elementary students' measuring abilities by using a microgenetic method. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(4), 341-355.   과학기술학회마을
27 Yang, S. & Cho, I. (2001). A study of correlations among measurement abilities, mathematical concept and problem-solving abilities on young children. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education, 5(3), 103-122.
28 Yoon, H. (2000). An analysis on the measurement sense of the elementary students. Korea National University of Education Master degree thesis.
29 Holmqvist, K., NystrOm, M., Anderson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H. & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford University Press. pp. 9-144.