Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.1.129

The Effect of Elementary Science Class with Name Card Method on Learning Motivation and Academic Achievement of Elementary Students  

Yang, Seung-Won (Namcheon Elementary School)
Bae, Jinho (Busan National University of Education)
So, Keum-Hyun (Busan National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education / v.33, no.1, 2014 , pp. 129-139 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to examine the effect of elementary science class using name card method on scientific learning motivation and academic achievement of elementary students. Two sixth grade classes were divided into experimental group and comparison group to treat the experimental group with elementary science class using name card method. General class according to teacher manual was implemented for the comparison group. Elementary science class applying name card method was conducted for 10 sessions throughout the experimental period of 8 weeks. The results of this study were as follows. First, elementary science class with name card method was effective in improving scientific learning motivation. Second, elementary science class with name card method had significant effect on improvement of scientific learning academic achievement. The study results showed that elementary science class with name card method was effective for scientific learning motivation and academic achievement of elementary students.
Keywords
name card method; science learning motivation; science academic achievement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sprod, T. (1998). "I can change your opinion on that": Socail constructivist whole class discussions and their effect on scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 463-480.   DOI
2 Stodolsky, S. l., Ferguson, T. & Wimpelberg, K. (1981). The recitation persists, but what does it look like? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, 121-130.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Theberge, C. L. (1994). Small-group ws. whole class discussion:Gaining the floor in science lessons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
4 Tobin, K. & Garnett, P. (1987). Gender related differences in science activities. Science Education, 71(1), 91-103.   DOI
5 Winebrenner, S. & Brulles, D. (2008). The cluster grouping handbook; How to challenge gifted students and improve achievement for all. Free Spirit publishing.
6 Chung, Y. & Son, D. (2000). Effects of cooperative learning strategy on achievement and science learning attitudes in middle school biology. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), 611-623.   과학기술학회마을
7 Alexopoulou, E. & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 1099-1114.   DOI
8 Basili, P. A. & Sanford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 293-304.   DOI
9 Bianchini, J. A. (1995). Groupwork in middle school science: A case study of scientific knowledge and social process construction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
10 Han, J. & Noh, T. (2002). Students' perceptions on small group activities in science classes and the relationship with personality. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 449-507.
11 Han, S. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Seoul National University.
12 Kang, S., Han, S. & Noh, T. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(1), 93-101.   과학기술학회마을
13 Jang, I. (2003). A study on application state of "discussion learning" as a science teaching method to secondary school. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Sookmyung Women's University.
14 Kang, S., Kim, Y. & Noh, T. (2004). The influence of small group discussion using the history of science upon students' understanding about the nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 996-1007.
15 Jeong, J. (2005). The effects of the scheduling of smallgroup discussion sessions on the children's science inquiry abilities and verbal interactions in elementary science labworks. A doctoral thesis from the Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education.
16 Kang, S. & Noh, T. (2000). Effect of concept learning strategy emphasizing social consensus during discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 250-261.   과학기술학회마을
17 Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong, Y. & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of verbal interaction patterns in small-group discussion by learning strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.   과학기술학회마을
18 Kang, S., Lim, J., Kong, Y., Nam, J. & Choi, B. (2004). The development of students argumentation in science context. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 48(1), 85-93.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (ED). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20 Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.   DOI
21 Kwon, M. (2009). The effect of small group-cooperation learning for middle school student in earth science. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education.
22 Lim, H. & Noh, T. (2001). Verbal interactions in heterogeneous small - group cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(4), 668-676.   과학기술학회마을
23 Lee, H., Nam, K., Moon, S., Kim, Y. & Lee, S. (2005). The effects of science instruction using argumentation on elementary school students' learning motivation and scientific attitude. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 183-191.
24 Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
25 Nam, J., Kim, S., Kang, S., Park, J. & Choi, B. (2002). A study on classroom interactions by student's cognitive level in the performance of controlling variable tasks. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 110-121.   과학기술학회마을
26 Meyer, K. & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173-192.   DOI
27 Oh, J. (2004). The effects of science instruction using ARCS model on learning motive and academic achieve ment. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Busan National University of Education.
28 Park, S. & Kim, Y. (2006). An inquiry on the relationships among learning-flow factors, flow level, achievement under on-line learning environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 93-115.
29 Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.   DOI
30 Ministry of Education Human Resources Development. (2007). Science Curriculum. Ministry of Education Human Resources Development notice 2007-79.