1 |
Sprod, T. (1998). "I can change your opinion on that": Socail constructivist whole class discussions and their effect on scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 463-480.
DOI
|
2 |
Stodolsky, S. l., Ferguson, T. & Wimpelberg, K. (1981). The recitation persists, but what does it look like? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 13, 121-130.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Theberge, C. L. (1994). Small-group ws. whole class discussion:Gaining the floor in science lessons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
|
4 |
Tobin, K. & Garnett, P. (1987). Gender related differences in science activities. Science Education, 71(1), 91-103.
DOI
|
5 |
Winebrenner, S. & Brulles, D. (2008). The cluster grouping handbook; How to challenge gifted students and improve achievement for all. Free Spirit publishing.
|
6 |
Chung, Y. & Son, D. (2000). Effects of cooperative learning strategy on achievement and science learning attitudes in middle school biology. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), 611-623.
과학기술학회마을
|
7 |
Alexopoulou, E. & Driver, R. (1996). Small-group discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 1099-1114.
DOI
|
8 |
Basili, P. A. & Sanford, J. P. (1991). Conceptual change strategies and cooperative group work in chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 293-304.
DOI
|
9 |
Bianchini, J. A. (1995). Groupwork in middle school science: A case study of scientific knowledge and social process construction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
|
10 |
Han, J. & Noh, T. (2002). Students' perceptions on small group activities in science classes and the relationship with personality. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 449-507.
|
11 |
Han, S. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Seoul National University.
|
12 |
Kang, S., Han, S. & Noh, T. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(1), 93-101.
과학기술학회마을
|
13 |
Jang, I. (2003). A study on application state of "discussion learning" as a science teaching method to secondary school. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Sookmyung Women's University.
|
14 |
Kang, S., Kim, Y. & Noh, T. (2004). The influence of small group discussion using the history of science upon students' understanding about the nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 996-1007.
|
15 |
Jeong, J. (2005). The effects of the scheduling of smallgroup discussion sessions on the children's science inquiry abilities and verbal interactions in elementary science labworks. A doctoral thesis from the Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education.
|
16 |
Kang, S. & Noh, T. (2000). Effect of concept learning strategy emphasizing social consensus during discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 250-261.
과학기술학회마을
|
17 |
Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong, Y. & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of verbal interaction patterns in small-group discussion by learning strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.
과학기술학회마을
|
18 |
Kang, S., Lim, J., Kong, Y., Nam, J. & Choi, B. (2004). The development of students argumentation in science context. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 48(1), 85-93.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (ED). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
20 |
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2-10.
DOI
|
21 |
Kwon, M. (2009). The effect of small group-cooperation learning for middle school student in earth science. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Korea National University of Education.
|
22 |
Lim, H. & Noh, T. (2001). Verbal interactions in heterogeneous small - group cooperative learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(4), 668-676.
과학기술학회마을
|
23 |
Lee, H., Nam, K., Moon, S., Kim, Y. & Lee, S. (2005). The effects of science instruction using argumentation on elementary school students' learning motivation and scientific attitude. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 183-191.
|
24 |
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
|
25 |
Nam, J., Kim, S., Kang, S., Park, J. & Choi, B. (2002). A study on classroom interactions by student's cognitive level in the performance of controlling variable tasks. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(1), 110-121.
과학기술학회마을
|
26 |
Meyer, K. & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173-192.
DOI
|
27 |
Oh, J. (2004). The effects of science instruction using ARCS model on learning motive and academic achieve ment. A master's thesis from the Graduate School of Education Busan National University of Education.
|
28 |
Park, S. & Kim, Y. (2006). An inquiry on the relationships among learning-flow factors, flow level, achievement under on-line learning environment. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 14(1), 93-115.
|
29 |
Richmond, G. & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.
DOI
|
30 |
Ministry of Education Human Resources Development. (2007). Science Curriculum. Ministry of Education Human Resources Development notice 2007-79.
|