Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22671/JKADA.2021.9.1.38

Analysis of trends in the dental care quality improvement contests  

Hwang, Soo-Jeong (Doonsan Health Promotion Center)
Shin, Hosung (Department of Social and Humanity in Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Kim, Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Kim, Myoung-Hee (Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Health Science, Eulji University)
Ahn, Eunsuk (Division of Climate Change and Health Protection, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Academy of Dental Administration / v.9, no.1, 2021 , pp. 38-43 More about this Journal
Abstract
Based on data from the Korean Academy for Dental Administration, which has been conducting the Dental Quality Improvement (QI) Contest since 2010, we aimed to provide basic data for the development of dental quality improvement indicators by analyzing the trends of dental quality improvement activities. A total of 54 articles in the dental QI contest from 2015 to 2021 were used to search for frequently used words and to classify the quality of dental care. The criteria for the quality dimension of dental care were first classified into structure, process, and outcome, and secondary classification was performed into patient safety, timeliness, patient-centeredness, equity, efficiency, effectiveness, and accessibility. The frequently used key terms were satisfaction (five times), efficiency (four times), system (three times), and implant (three times). The activities for process evaluation were high at 62.26%, structural evaluation activities at 35.85%, and outcome evaluation activities at 1.89%. According to the components of dental care quality improvement, the activity performed under efficiency was the highest (33.96%), followed by patient-centeredness (18.87%), effectiveness (16.98%), patient safety (15.09%), accessibility (5.66%), timeliness (1.89%), and the equity (1.89%). QI activities in dental hospitals were mainly activities on improvement in structure and process, as well as activities on efficiency, patient-centeredness, effectiveness, and patient safety.
Keywords
Administration; Dentistry; Quality improvement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kang HC, Ha S, Lee SK, Kim SW, Kim NS, Lee KS, et al. Policy issues for measuring the quality of health care (II): developing Korean healthcare quality report. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2014.
2 Kang HC, Oh YS, Paik HY, Ha S, Kim SW, Seo EW, et al. Assessment of the innovation outcome in the Korea health care system: 2017 Korea healthcare quality report. Sejong: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2017.
3 Kim HN, Kim H, Kim HY. Conditions and performance of quality improvement activity in Korean dental hospitals. J Dent Hyg Sci 2013;13(4):359-368.
4 Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2004 Hospital Evaluation Programme: survey report. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute; 2005. pp.2-8.
5 Shin HS, Jeong MK. Evaluation of 2007 dental hospital accreditation demonstration project. J Korean Acad Dent Health 2008;32(3):350-62.
6 Shin HS. Oral healthcare quality and measurement of quality indicators. J Korean Acad Dent Adm 2020;8(1):8-14.   DOI
7 Vuori HV. Quality assurance of health services: concepts and methodology. Albany (NY): World Health Organization Centre USA; 1982.
8 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Design a Strategy for Quality Review and Assurance in Medicare. In: Lohr KN, editor. Medicare: a strategy for quality assurance. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press; 1990.
9 이상일. 의료의 질 관리: 기본 개념과 접근법. 가정의학회지 2006;27(11 Suppl):S170-4.
10 안형식. 의료의 질 평가와 향상: 개념, 전력 및 정책. 한국보건행정학회 2006년도 제2회 공동학술대회. 서울: 한국보건행정학회; 2006.
11 임지혜. 외국의 임상 질 지표 관리 및 질 측정 개념 틀. HIRA연구 2015;9(1):79-92.
12 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2005 National healthcare quality report. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.
13 Berwick DM, James B, Coye MJ. Connections between quality measurement and improvement. Med Care 2003;41(1 Suppl):I30-8.