Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7315/CDE.2016.281

A Study on the Evaluation Items of BIM Process Maturity Measurement Model  

Lee, Jae-sung (Dept. of New Energy Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
Ock, Jong-ho (Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Computational Design and Engineering / v.21, no.3, 2016 , pp. 281-295 More about this Journal
Abstract
Lately, the management of domestic BIM performance is quite lacking, as the evaluation and management data from successful cases of BIM implementation both on projects and in companies, and related effects (time, cost and other physical gains) are not well kept for future use in BIM development. In order to overcome the above obstacles, a systematic approach to evaluating BIM adoption with focus on particular elements like BIM implementation environment and processes, and the physical factors yielded by BIM, is necessary. In this study, objective and detailed assessment indicators and weights that are appropriate for the domestic situation were derived through research for purposes of developing a web-based BIM maturity measurement program that is tailor-made for the Korean construction atmosphere. Through a company's self-maturity measurement, excellent quality of BIM deliverables and output can be achieved and managed. Furthermore, the domestic BIM capacity can gradually increase since design firms' BIM capability can be judged during procurement basing on measurement indicators.
Keywords
Assessment; Building Information Modeling (BIM); Capability Evaluation; Design Organizations Maturity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, J.S., Kim, M.W. and Ock, J.H., 2015, A Study on the Development of BIM Process Maturity Measurement Model, Proceedings of the Society for Computational Design and Engineering Conference, 611-617.
2 Kang, T.W., 2013, A Study on the Development Direction of a BIM Performance Assessment Tool, Journal of Korea Spatial Information Society, 21(1), pp.55-56.
3 Lee, J.H., 2011, A Study on BIM Capability Evaluation for Design Organizations, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(6), pp.260.
4 Kang, H.M., 2013, A Study on Evaluation of the BIM Capability Maturity and Recognition Comparison Analysis for Construction Organization, Master Thesis, Ewha Womans University, pp.34-35.
5 Lee, S.K., 2014, BIM Acceptance Readiness Evaluation Model Considering Organizational Culture, KwangWoon University.
6 Yang, B.H., 2013. A Study on the BIM Maturity Measurement of Domestic Field Based BIM Capability Maturity Model, Sungkyunkwan University.
7 Shin, S.H., Ham, N.H. and Kim, J.J., 2010, Assessment of BIM-Based Government Funded Projects at the Design Phase, Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction.
8 Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute, 2003, The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Pearson Education Korea.
9 National Information Society Arency, 2007, 2007 Enterprise Informatization Level Evaluation Report.
10 Public Procurement Service Press, 2015.
11 BIM performance, www.buildingsmart.or.kr
12 bimSCORE, www.sbi.international