Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.08.060

Selective Interactivity and Reflexive Intermediality: Focusing on the Neflix Film  

Kim, Mookyu (부경대학교 신문방송학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.21, no.8, 2021 , pp. 60-68 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the formal characteristics of , which has been screened on Netflix since 2018. This film can be considered an interactive narrative because it gives viewers the opportunity to select their own narrative forks which lead to various endings. However, it also limits viewers' freedom of interactions in many ways, resulting in the pessimistic narrative world of series. In this contradictory situation, the conflict between the user's selectability and the narrator's authoriality emerges. And this collision gives rise to a complex form in which nonlinear interactive and linear narrative forms blend together. It can be understood as a form of self-reflection, such as forms of the metalepsis and breaking the fourth wall. In this paper, this particular form will be regarded as a sort of reflexive intermediality, i. e. the form for media reflexion.
Keywords
Bandersnatch; Narrative; Metalepsis; Interactivity; Intermediality;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김무규, 미디어의 공존과 변형: 상호미디어성의 의미와 유형, 영상과 상호미디어성, 한울, pp.11-38, 2013.
2 T. McSweeney and S. Joy, Change your Past, your Present, your Future?, Through the Black Mirror, Palgrave Macmillan, p.281, 2019.
3 H. Koenitz, G. Ferri, M. Haahr, D. Sezen, and T. I. Sezen, Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice, Routledge, 2015.
4 M. L. Ryan, "Transmedia Storytelling: Industry Buzzword or new Narrative Experience?," Storyworlds, Vol.7, No.2, pp.1-19, 2015.   DOI
5 K. Krichmann, Zwischen Selbstreflexivitat und Selbstreferentialitat, Im Spiegelkabinett der Illusionen: Filme uber sich selbst, Schuren, pp.67-86, 1996.
6 K. Daly, "Cinema 3.0: The interactive-image," Cinema Journal, Vol.50, No.1, pp.81-98, 2010.
7 W. Buckland, Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in contemporary Cinema, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
8 A. D'Aloia, "Against Interactivity," Series, Vol.4, No.2, pp.26-27, 2020.
9 T. McSweeney and S. Joy, Change your Past, your Present, your Future?, Through the Black Mirror, Palgrave Macmillan, p.277, 2019.
10 남명희, "<블랙미러: 밴더스내치>의 다중 경로 내러티브 전개법 분석," 영상문화콘텐츠연구, 제17권, p.164, 2019.
11 앤소니 기든스, 울리히 벡, 스콧 래쉬, 성찰적 근대화, 한울, 1998.
12 J. Herkman, T. Hujanen, and P. Oinonen, Intermediality and Media Change, Tempere University Press, pp.10-28, 2012.
13 윤혜영, "인터랙티브 드라마로서 <블랙미러: 밴더스내치>에 나타난 소외 효과," 만화애니메이션연구, 제3권, pp.269-293, 2020.
14 헨리 젠킨스, 컨버전스 컬쳐, 비즈앤비즈, 2008.
15 J. Paech, Intermedialitat als Methode und Verfahren, Jurgen Muller, Media Encounters and Media Theories, Modus, pp.57-75, 2008.