Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.06.228

A Study of Authors' Moral Rights Infringements Regarding Cinematographic Works and Other Visual Works  

Kang, Sang-Gu (광운대학교 대학원 신문방송학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.21, no.6, 2021 , pp. 228-236 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research investigates the causes of infringements related to authors' moral rights which has most conflict among moral rights of authorship, through analysis of judicial precedents and compare whether there subsists any differences in viewpoints between judicial precedent trend and those on behind the scene of broadcast production. Copyright is divided into intellectual property and moral rights of authorship. Right to the integrity of the work is part of moral rights of authorship and produce one content and used in various media. When the edit is needed to fit the organization and advertisement time, advanced consultation from the rightful owner or written consent is needed. However, under the time pressure or ignorance of copyright, the arbitrary edits are made and content is used. This infringes the right of the integrity of the work. When we produce and use cinematographic works and other audiovisual works, there are considerable variablilies stemming from authorship, production cost and program staff. Therefore, prior conscent is needed to acquire and use the copyright in a proper manner. However, due to production-oriented environment and low understanding of the copyright protection, we usually depend on the users' work practices rhather than insufficiency of copyright laws in dealing with the infringement of right to the industry. In conclusion, we need to provide meticulous work manual and to focus on systematic eduction of professional copyright manpower.
Keywords
Copyright; Moral Rights of Authorship; Right to the Integrity of the Work; Cinematographic Works and Other Visual Works;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 서울중앙지방법원 선고 2013가합85566 판결 (2015. 1.16.)
2 대법원 선고 96도2856 판결(1997. 6.10)
3 이광성, "저작인격권의 내용과 제한에 대한 교육적 함의," 법교육연구, 제12권, 제2호, pp.129-149, 2017.
4 서울지방법원 선고 88가합2442 판결 (1989.12.8)
5 서울지방법원 선고 2001카합1837 판결(2001.11. 1)
6 서울민사지방법원 선고 90카합98799 판결 (1991. 4.26)
7 서울고등법원 선고 92나35846 판결 (1994. 9.27).
8 서울고등법원 선고 1995나18736 판결(1995.10.19.)
9 서울중앙지법 선고 2006가합104292 판결(2007. 5.17)
10 서울고등법원 선고 2002나986 판결 (2002.10.15.)
11 서울중앙지법 선고 2008가합97091 판결 (2009. 7.16.)
12 서울중앙지법 선고 2010가합14594 판결(2010.11.30.)
13 서울중앙지방법원 선고 2012가합106749 판결(2014. 2.20.)
14 대법원 선고 2012다204587 판결(2015. 8.27.)
15 서울중앙지법 2018나45581 판결(2019. 1.11.)
16 이재진, 이영희, "음악.영상저작물의 동일성유지권 침해판단에 관한 연구," 미디어경제와 문화, 제11권, 제3호, pp.121-173, 2013.
17 대법원 선고 92다31309 판결(1992.12.24)
18 정상조, 저작권법 주해, 서울: 박영사, p.343, 2007.
19 서울지방법원 선고 89가합62247 판결 (1990. 9.20)
20 이재진, 언론의 자유와 인격권, 도서출판 한나래, p.17, p.116, 2006.
21 서울고등법원 선고 2003나6530 판결(2003.12.16.)
22 서울민사지법 선고 94가합28760 판결(1994.9. 2)
23 서울고등법원 선고 2000나36738 판결(2001.10.11.)
24 서울고법 선고 2007나70720 판결(2008. 9.23.)
25 서울중앙지법 선고 2018가합516867 판결(2019. 2.18.)
26 임원선, 실무자를 위한 저작권법, 진주: 한국저작권위원회, p.464, 2014.